FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3136016926> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3136016926 endingPage "1793" @default.
• W3136016926 startingPage "1784" @default.
• W3136016926 abstract "Abstract Davids, CJ, Raastad, T, James, L, Gajanand, T, Smith, E, Connick, M, McGorm, H, Keating, S, Coombes, JS, Peake, JM, and Roberts, LA. Similar morphological and functional training adaptations occur between continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction. J Strength Cond Res 35(7): 1784–1793, 2021—The aim of the study was to compare skeletal muscle morphological and functional outcomes after low-load resistance training using 2 differing blood flow restriction (BFR) protocols. Recreationally active men and women ( n = 42 [f = 21], 24.4 ± 4.4 years) completed 21 sessions over 7 weeks of load-matched and volume-matched low-load resistance training (30% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]) with either (a) no BFR (CON), (b) continuous BFR (BFR-C, 60% arterial occlusion pressure [AOP]), or (c) intermittent BFR (BFR-I, 60% AOP). Muscle mass was assessed using peripheral quantitative computed tomography before and after training. Muscular strength, endurance, and power were determined before and after training by assessing isokinetic dynamometry, 1RM, and jump performance. Ratings of pain and effort were taken in the first and final training session. An alpha level of p < 0.05 was used to determine significance. There were no between-group differences for any of the morphological or functional variables. The muscle cross sectional area (CSA) increased pre-post training ( p = 0.009; CON: 1.6%, BFR-C: 1.1%, BFR-I: 2.2%). Maximal isometric strength increased pre-post training ( p < 0.001; CON: 9.6%, BFR-C: 14.3%, BFR-I: 19.3%). Total work performed during an isokinetic endurance task increased pre-post training ( p < 0.001, CON: 3.6%, BFR-C: 9.6%, BFR-I: 11.3%). Perceptions of pain ( p = 0.026) and effort ( p = 0.033) during exercise were higher with BFR-C; however, these reduced with training ( p = 0.005–0.034). Overall, these data suggest that when 30% 1RM loads are used with a frequency of 3 times per week, the addition of BFR does not confer superior morphological or functional adaptations in recreationally active individuals. Furthermore, the additional metabolic stress that is proposed to occur with a continuous BFR protocol does not seem to translate into proportionally greater training adaptations. The current findings promote the use of both intermittent BFR and low-load resistance training without BFR as suitable alternative training methods to continuous BFR. These approaches may be practically applicable for those less tolerable to pain and discomfort associated with ischemia during exercise." @default.
• W3136016926 created "2021-03-29" @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5009616382 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5013611451 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5019322918 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5024849047 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5026683213 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5049391173 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5050975198 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5080540504 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5082794509 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5083087105 @default.
• W3136016926 creator A5089618128 @default.
• W3136016926 date "2021-05-20" @default.
• W3136016926 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3136016926 title "Similar Morphological and Functional Training Adaptations Occur Between Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction" @default.
• W3136016926 cites W1240635074 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W1269027927 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W1524049951 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W1531595830 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W1541458845 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W1569497618 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W1787402265 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W1982924639 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2000489675 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2000505477 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2005748282 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2037881090 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2048443632 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2055576449 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2059027461 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2061598665 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2062178725 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2063808936 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2077949032 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2081874449 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2087307311 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2101758602 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2113123617 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2113908967 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2154869434 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2159965539 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2549424713 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2580363442 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2750223881 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2766158028 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2796355540 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2890106358 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2903026900 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2903735571 @default.
• W3136016926 cites W2944877286 @default.
• W3136016926 doi "https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000004034" @default.
• W3136016926 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34027913" @default.
• W3136016926 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3136016926 type Work @default.
• W3136016926 sameAs 3136016926 @default.
• W3136016926 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3136016926 countsByYear W31360169262022 @default.
• W3136016926 countsByYear W31360169262023 @default.
• W3136016926 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5009616382 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5013611451 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5019322918 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5024849047 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5026683213 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5049391173 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5050975198 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5080540504 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5082794509 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5083087105 @default.
• W3136016926 hasAuthorship W3136016926A5089618128 @default.
• W3136016926 hasBestOaLocation W31360169262 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C103486182 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C119343949 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C2777112482 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C2777861855 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C3019424981 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C3020250263 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C103486182 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C119343949 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C126322002 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C164705383 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C1862650 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C2777112482 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C2777861855 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C3019424981 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C3020250263 @default.
• W3136016926 hasConceptScore W3136016926C71924100 @default.
• W3136016926 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3136016926 hasLocation W31360169261 @default.
• W3136016926 hasLocation W31360169262 @default.
• W3136016926 hasLocation W31360169263 @default.
• W3136016926 hasOpenAccess W3136016926 @default.
• W3136016926 hasPrimaryLocation W31360169261 @default.

• next