FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3136233646> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3136233646 endingPage "1352" @default.
• W3136233646 startingPage "1343" @default.
• W3136233646 abstract "The rise in chronic diseases urges for an identification of interventions that improve adherence. However, no golden standard exists for evaluating adherence in polymedicated patients. The objectives were to investigate the impact of a pharmacist-led medication use review (MUR) service on adherence implementation rates for chronic medication, and to evaluate the appropriateness of two adherence calculation approaches in this regard.Before-after study (SIMENON study) including ambulatory, aged, polymedicated patients. Refill data were used to calculate the proportion of days covered (PDC) per medication before and after the MUR. Adherence was assessed for chronic, solid, oral medication using a prescription-based and interval-based approach, and the performance of both approaches was compared.Adherence was evaluated for 1483 medications from 316 patients. The median baseline PDC per medication was 0.95 (prescription-based method) and 0.91 (interval-based approach). Pearson correlation between both approaches was 0.616 (P < .0001). The prescription-based approach found less medication below the adherence threshold of 0.80 (319 medications; 21.5% vs 481 medications; 32.4%). Using the prescription-based approach, the proportion of non-adherent patients at baseline was 61.7% (195/316 patients), of which 54.9% (107/195 patients) was only non-adherent for one medication. Median PDC scores increased significantly from 0.95 to 0.99 and 0.91 to 0.99 with the prescription-based and interval-based approach respectively (both P < .0001). Only considering the 319 medications with baseline PDC scores <0.8 using the prescription-based approach, the median PDC scores significantly increased from 0.67 to 0.84 (P < .0001), with a median score improvement of 18.3%.Although baseline adherence was high in this population of polymedicated aged patients, both calculation methods showed the MUR significantly improved adherence. The prescription-based approach was considered the most appropriate method. Based on these findings and literature evidence, it is recommended to implement the MUR service in Belgium and target non-adherent patients for maximal effect." @default.
• W3136233646 created "2021-03-29" @default.
• W3136233646 creator A5023914295 @default.
• W3136233646 creator A5059464449 @default.
• W3136233646 creator A5072360601 @default.
• W3136233646 creator A5076959956 @default.
• W3136233646 creator A5087940733 @default.
• W3136233646 date "2021-03-24" @default.
• W3136233646 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3136233646 title "Does a pharmacist‐led medication use review improve medication adherence in polymedicated aged patients? Methodological choices matter!" @default.
• W3136233646 cites W1741567663 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W1757158931 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W1845225129 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2011801082 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2017975952 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2071573356 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2090151661 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2155441883 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2285902090 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2324452947 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2338651455 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2604581019 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2743439262 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2804732925 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2809492364 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2810576375 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2811496043 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2885136905 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2885516122 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2888527385 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2890229003 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2891269899 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2898344102 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2901418399 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2903057497 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2916722889 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2940699110 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W2989638096 @default.
• W3136233646 cites W3005130845 @default.
• W3136233646 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13567" @default.
• W3136233646 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33760376" @default.
• W3136233646 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3136233646 type Work @default.
• W3136233646 sameAs 3136233646 @default.
• W3136233646 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3136233646 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3136233646 hasAuthorship W3136233646A5023914295 @default.
• W3136233646 hasAuthorship W3136233646A5059464449 @default.
• W3136233646 hasAuthorship W3136233646A5072360601 @default.
• W3136233646 hasAuthorship W3136233646A5076959956 @default.
• W3136233646 hasAuthorship W3136233646A5087940733 @default.
• W3136233646 hasBestOaLocation W31362336462 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C2426938 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C2779457091 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C3018553135 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C35785553 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C36434225 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C104863432 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C126322002 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C159110408 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C1862650 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C2426938 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C27415008 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C2779457091 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C3018553135 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C35785553 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C36434225 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C44249647 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C512399662 @default.
• W3136233646 hasConceptScore W3136233646C71924100 @default.
• W3136233646 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3136233646 hasLocation W31362336461 @default.
• W3136233646 hasLocation W31362336462 @default.
• W3136233646 hasLocation W31362336463 @default.
• W3136233646 hasOpenAccess W3136233646 @default.
• W3136233646 hasPrimaryLocation W31362336461 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W1592136564 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W1784093982 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W1984922927 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W2030909231 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W2041884123 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W2552583352 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W3137819944 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W3188803873 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W4225285109 @default.
• W3136233646 hasRelatedWork W4386065444 @default.
• W3136233646 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W3136233646 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3136233646 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3136233646 magId "3136233646" @default.

• next