FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3136313654> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3136313654 endingPage "1078" @default.
• W3136313654 startingPage "1058" @default.
• W3136313654 abstract "Abstract The right to contest automated decisions as provided by Article 22 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a due process provision with concrete transparency implications. Based on this, the paper in hand aims, first , to provide an interpretation of Art 22 and the right to contest (as the key provision in determining the contours of transparency in relation to automated decisions under the GDPR); second , to provide a systematic account of possible administrative, procedural, and technical mechanisms (transparency measures) that could be deployed for the purpose contesting automated decisions; and third , to examine the compatibility of these mechanisms with the GDPR. Following the introduction, Part II starts with an analysis of the newly enacted right to contest solely automated decisions as provided under Article 22 of the GDPR. This part identifies the right to contest in Article 22 as the core remedy, with inherent transparency requirements which are foundational for due process. Setting the right to contest as the backbone of protection against the adverse effects of solely automated decisions, Part III focuses on certain key points and provisions under the GDPR, which are described as the 1st layer (human‐intelligible) transparency. This part explores to what extent “information and access” rights (Articles 13, 14, and 15) could satisfy the transparency requirements for the purposes of contestation as explained in Part II. Next, Part IV briefly identifies the limits of 1st layer transparency – explaining how technical complexity together with competition and integrity‐related concerns render human‐level transparency either infeasible or legally impossible. In what follows, Part V conceptualizes a 2nd layer of transparency which consists of further administrative, procedural, and technical measures (i.e., design choices facilitating interpretability , institutional oversight , and algorithmic scrutiny) . Finally, Part VI identifies four regulatory options, combining 1st and 2nd layer transparency measures to implement Article 22. The primary aim of the paper is to provide a systematic interpretation of Article 22 and examine how “the right to contest solely automated decisions” could help give meaning to the overall transparency provisions of the GDPR. With a view to transcend the current debates about the existence of a so‐called right to an explanation, the paper develops an interdisciplinary approach, focusing on the specific transparency implications of the “right to contest” as a remedy of procedural nature." @default.
• W3136313654 created "2021-03-29" @default.
• W3136313654 creator A5061316823 @default.
• W3136313654 date "2021-03-14" @default.
• W3136313654 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3136313654 title "The right to contest automated decisions under the <scp>General Data Protection Regulation</scp>: Beyond the so‐called “right to explanation”" @default.
• W3136313654 cites W162565672 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W1973682096 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W1978129870 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2122331263 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2150129850 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2157655352 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2214599151 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2282821441 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2498041801 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2553650922 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2610694719 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2619503097 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2619904157 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2756900437 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2765927687 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2770363731 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2772974342 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2796133875 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2888358891 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2896245505 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2896769903 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2897439270 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2898645128 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2901812949 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2904441802 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2949041899 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2954197146 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2960518403 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2963306599 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2963473400 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2975641834 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2990556942 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W2990968402 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W3002694357 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W3095766918 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W3122548859 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W3124443940 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W3159249221 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W3167266398 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W4235105928 @default.
• W3136313654 cites W4245317088 @default.
• W3136313654 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12391" @default.
• W3136313654 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3136313654 type Work @default.
• W3136313654 sameAs 3136313654 @default.
• W3136313654 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W3136313654 countsByYear W31363136542020 @default.
• W3136313654 countsByYear W31363136542021 @default.
• W3136313654 countsByYear W31363136542022 @default.
• W3136313654 countsByYear W31363136542023 @default.
• W3136313654 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3136313654 hasAuthorship W3136313654A5061316823 @default.
• W3136313654 hasBestOaLocation W31363136542 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C2775833480 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C2777582232 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C3090818 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConcept C69360830 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C112930515 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C144133560 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C162324750 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C17744445 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C190253527 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C199539241 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C2775833480 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C2777582232 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C2780233690 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C3090818 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C38652104 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C41008148 @default.
• W3136313654 hasConceptScore W3136313654C69360830 @default.
• W3136313654 hasFunder F4320312335 @default.
• W3136313654 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3136313654 hasLocation W31363136541 @default.
• W3136313654 hasLocation W31363136542 @default.
• W3136313654 hasOpenAccess W3136313654 @default.
• W3136313654 hasPrimaryLocation W31363136541 @default.
• W3136313654 hasRelatedWork W2774250650 @default.
• W3136313654 hasRelatedWork W2792231445 @default.
• W3136313654 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3136313654 hasRelatedWork W2995349716 @default.
• W3136313654 hasRelatedWork W3136313654 @default.
• W3136313654 hasRelatedWork W3167623206 @default.
• W3136313654 hasRelatedWork W4229541272 @default.

• next