Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W313645734> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W313645734 endingPage "34" @default.
- W313645734 startingPage "23" @default.
- W313645734 abstract "INTRODUCTION In times of dwindling resources and increasing workloads, research administrators need to direct their time and energy toward academic units and faculty members who can benefit most from their assistance. It is not frequently appreciated outside (and sometimes inside) academe that, on the average, most universities make financial investments when they accept grants and other sponsored projects awards, even if all allowed facilities and administrative costs are fully recovered. This is mainly because the relevant regulations governing the determination of allowable sponsored project costs, such as the OMB A-21, do not allow for full recovery of all costs related to the performance of sponsored projects (Yale Science Policy Committee, 1996). Moreover, many funding agencies do not pay for the full direct costs of projects they support. In other cases, the institution may be committed to carrying out a mission-driven project with, or without, external support. When such projects are supported through a grant, the institution considers the grant a cost-saving contribution that reduces the institution's investment. Investments through budget allocation for such uncompensated elements of sponsored project costs are legitimate components of the resource allocation process at universities. The allocation of faculty capacity for research and sponsored project (RSP) activities, for example, can be a form of resource investment in an institutional research development program. Such a program, if properly directed toward those units and faculty who can best benefit from it, should produce a distribution in the utility of faculty RSP capacity with outcomes that are consistent with institutional goals and missions. The outcomes or products of a research development program are the results of the utility of faculty capacity devoted to research and sponsored project activities. Thus, outcomes will change as that utility changes. Relating faculty capacity to the products of research and sponsored projects may evoke images of a corporate production model. Such a view of faculty productivity is not regarded with favor by some in the academic community, although Verry and Davies (1976), among others, have developed useful models of university production that parallel those used within corporations. Research development, like most other processes at a university, requires the input of resources to produce outputs consistent with the research goals and missions of the institution. In developing effective strategies for the use of university resources to achieve these goals, it is appropriate to relate input capacities to output measures that do not depend on the model assumed for university production. Besides such productivity measures as the number of proposals submitted and the number and dollar value of awards received by a unit, there is a need for understanding the underlying factors that affect the research and sponsored project performance of units in research institutions (Monahan & Fortune, 1995). As part of an effort to gain such understanding, we will consider the distribution of faculty capacity (fraction of FTE effort) utilized for sponsored project activities as a critical factor in the performance of sponsored projects. Then, we will develop a model-independent RSP activity measure that can be readily used in creating generic strategies for research and sponsored project development. DEVELOPMENT OF SPONSORED PROJECTS The services that a research administrator provides to an academic unit should be designed to meet the needs of individual elements (faculty, research group, center, etc.) of the unit. This requires knowledge of the sponsored project history and current activities of all elements of the unit. based on such knowledge and in collaboration with relevant personnel in the unit, a research administrator can design a structured set of activities for the development of sponsored projects that meet the goals of the unit. …" @default.
- W313645734 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W313645734 creator A5027160269 @default.
- W313645734 date "1999-01-01" @default.
- W313645734 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W313645734 title "Relating Capacity to a Faculty Funding Persistence Profile." @default.
- W313645734 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
- W313645734 type Work @default.
- W313645734 sameAs 313645734 @default.
- W313645734 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W313645734 countsByYear W3136457342015 @default.
- W313645734 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W313645734 hasAuthorship W313645734A5027160269 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C206345919 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C27548731 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C2780510313 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C29202148 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W313645734 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C10138342 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C111919701 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C144133560 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C162324750 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C17744445 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C187736073 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C199539241 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C206345919 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C27548731 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C2780510313 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C29202148 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C31258907 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C41008148 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C94625758 @default.
- W313645734 hasConceptScore W313645734C98045186 @default.
- W313645734 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W313645734 hasLocation W3136457341 @default.
- W313645734 hasOpenAccess W313645734 @default.
- W313645734 hasPrimaryLocation W3136457341 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W1008446012 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W1413512778 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W158394137 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W2011586284 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W2126477729 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W2133660425 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W2240618055 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W2315617819 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W2323608732 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W26161977 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W2622915756 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W275201786 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W2786527999 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W2915915861 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W3081287934 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W311807783 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W3125151816 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W55719728 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W610073733 @default.
- W313645734 hasRelatedWork W263924873 @default.
- W313645734 hasVolume "31" @default.
- W313645734 isParatext "false" @default.
- W313645734 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W313645734 magId "313645734" @default.
- W313645734 workType "article" @default.