FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3136882046> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3136882046 endingPage "100688" @default.
• W3136882046 startingPage "100688" @default.
• W3136882046 abstract "Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a global effect on the training of residents of medicine because of what has been required in the pandemic. The field of oncology has not been spared, as prepandemic training schedules have not been available for residents. We conducted an online survey to understand the effect of the pandemic and the effect of online teaching schedules as a measure to help residents of oncology in their training.An online survey consisting of 31 questions was sent through various social media platforms based on the training pattern before the onset of COVID-19, effect of the pandemic on educational activities, and the effect of online academic activities on residency training and learning. The survey addressed the need for online academics as an alternate mode of teaching. The survey was left open for a period of 4 weeks with participation requests from the various branches of oncology, including radiation, surgical and medical oncology, onco-anesthesia, palliative oncology, neuro-oncology, and so forth. The frequencies obtained in the survey were analyzed using descriptive statistical analyses.After a 4-week period, there were 255 responses received from students of oncology from various specialties. Around 69.8.1% of respondents (n = 178) were junior residents, followed by senior residents (n = 72; 28.2%). The majority of the respondents were radiation oncologists (n = 204; 80%). Around 70.9% had an ongoing structured teaching program related to oncology training, with the majority (40.3%) of them having more than 3 hours every week of oncology-based training. Another 31.3% reported having 1 to 2 hours of such training every week, and 60.8% of participants agreed their training was affected by pandemic and related safety regulations. Most students (90.9%) found the online teaching sessions helped maintain training qualities as they were in the pre-COVID times. About 69.1% of the students felt that the quality of these online sessions was better compared with the institute-based onsite classroom teaching. However, as is expected, 77.6% of them agreed that their hands-on training was affected in the pandemic. When asked if online teaching can replace every aspect of classroom teaching, 66.7% of respondents did not agree. The majority (83.9%) felt that students should be given the opportunity to present a given topic under the supervision of a senior faculty member experienced and expert in that topic. The students pointed out the lack of practical exposure as the most common deficiency, followed by the lack of direct interaction with the teaching faculty.The pandemic has limited the access to essential training in the branches of oncology, and though online sessions cannot replace the hands-on training and clinical exposure needed for the students, online academics and webinars have proven to be an effective tool to minimize that effect and can lead to a positive outcome, as shown by the survey. A combination of online and onsite training modules may be the future of teaching and training in our country." @default.
• W3136882046 created "2021-03-29" @default.
• W3136882046 creator A5006953324 @default.
• W3136882046 creator A5021882786 @default.
• W3136882046 creator A5023439021 @default.
• W3136882046 creator A5079130774 @default.
• W3136882046 date "2021-07-01" @default.
• W3136882046 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3136882046 title "Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Oncology Residency Training in India and a Novel Online Academic Solution: Results of an Online Survey" @default.
• W3136882046 cites W2409253120 @default.
• W3136882046 cites W2896298022 @default.
• W3136882046 cites W2961372127 @default.
• W3136882046 cites W2971817589 @default.
• W3136882046 cites W3014513422 @default.
• W3136882046 cites W3019795600 @default.
• W3136882046 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100688" @default.
• W3136882046 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8281456" @default.
• W3136882046 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34296046" @default.
• W3136882046 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3136882046 type Work @default.
• W3136882046 sameAs 3136882046 @default.
• W3136882046 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3136882046 countsByYear W31368820462022 @default.
• W3136882046 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3136882046 hasAuthorship W3136882046A5006953324 @default.
• W3136882046 hasAuthorship W3136882046A5021882786 @default.
• W3136882046 hasAuthorship W3136882046A5023439021 @default.
• W3136882046 hasAuthorship W3136882046A5079130774 @default.
• W3136882046 hasBestOaLocation W31368820461 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C2780435969 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C2992520072 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConcept C89623803 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C126322002 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C143998085 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C15744967 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C19417346 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C2779134260 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C2780435969 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C2992520072 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C3008058167 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C47177190 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C509550671 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C509974204 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C512399662 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C524204448 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C71924100 @default.
• W3136882046 hasConceptScore W3136882046C89623803 @default.
• W3136882046 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3136882046 hasLocation W31368820461 @default.
• W3136882046 hasLocation W31368820462 @default.
• W3136882046 hasLocation W31368820463 @default.
• W3136882046 hasLocation W31368820464 @default.
• W3136882046 hasOpenAccess W3136882046 @default.
• W3136882046 hasPrimaryLocation W31368820461 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W3019646496 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W3024128669 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W3034773963 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W3039711063 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W3180686050 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W3195776524 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W4205415952 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W4296820108 @default.
• W3136882046 hasRelatedWork W4296890577 @default.
• W3136882046 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W3136882046 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3136882046 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3136882046 magId "3136882046" @default.
• W3136882046 workType "article" @default.