FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3136906341> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3136906341 abstract "Abstract Background: Identifying the level of radiology students and staffs's awareness of their knowledge of radiation risks and radiation protection and their understanding of radiation dose levels in medical imaging procedures will help global and national lawmakers adjust laws according to the recognized need in studies. The significance of this study is further enhanced when it is considered a lack of radiation awareness may increase the risk of radiation damage to themselves and patients. Method: This Crossectional study is done on 180 participants, including 62 participants were students (radiology residents and technologists), and 118 participants were radiology staff (radiologists and radiographers). For measuring the awareness of participants, a prepared questionnaire which had a total of 22 questions. The poll was divided into three sections of which: Demographics data, Radiation protection awareness, and knowledge of radiologists about dose assessment. The questionnaire reliability was assessed in terms of internal consistency utilizing the Cronbach’s alpha (0.85_). A P-value of less than 0.05 was set a threshold for statistical sig-nuisance. Statistical analysis was carried out using software SPSS version 22. Result: Most students believed that 1-year-old girls had the most sensitivity to radiation, while most staff found that radiation risk was unrelated to age and sex. Both staff and students found that crews working in nuclear medicine departments were more exposed to radiation (the majority). Most students and faculty also chose breast tissue as the most sensitive organ against radiation. It should be noted that among the staff responses, a significant number of bones were also selected. In general, students and staff did not have sufficient information about radiation-related illnesses. Approximately 82 percent of students chose a dose of Lumbar X-ray exams between 1 and 50 times the PA chest, and only 9 percent answered the question correctly (100-50 times). However, 27% of employees chose the correct answer. Students on the average dose of mammography had more choice (1-10 times) of a PA chest test, while staff preferred 100-500. (Both groups did not perform well in this question). The crew performed better on the dose resulting from a PET-CT test as well as the dose estimate from a nuclear medicine heart scan, and selected 36% correct response (more than 500 times the PA chest), while students had a lower rating (1-10 times) than others. Conclusion: In self-reported; most students and staffs believed that they had a suitable or sufficient level of awareness of ionizing radiation. Overall, 45% of students and staff rarely had any training or retraining (37%). Radiology students had a better level of knowledge about radiation protection than team, while team had better estimates in discussing dose assessment. In general, students and staff did not have sufficient information about radiation-related illnesses. Students and staff had accurate estimates of the dose received in a PA chest and the average dose of background radiation. Both groups had little information on mammography, but had good knowledge of ultrasound, MRI, and CT scans. In general, staff and students had a good understanding of nuclear medicine dose assessment." @default.
• W3136906341 created "2021-03-29" @default.
• W3136906341 creator A5015488720 @default.
• W3136906341 creator A5016148532 @default.
• W3136906341 creator A5042623563 @default.
• W3136906341 creator A5044843735 @default.
• W3136906341 creator A5049721238 @default.
• W3136906341 creator A5049934032 @default.
• W3136906341 creator A5051030586 @default.
• W3136906341 creator A5085090784 @default.
• W3136906341 creator A5087340651 @default.
• W3136906341 date "2020-07-27" @default.
• W3136906341 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3136906341 title "Awareness assessment of radiation protection, dose levels and complications of radiation exposure in imaging procedures among radiology residents, undergraduate radiology students, radiologists and technicians." @default.
• W3136906341 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-18369/v2" @default.
• W3136906341 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3136906341 type Work @default.
• W3136906341 sameAs 3136906341 @default.
• W3136906341 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3136906341 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3136906341 hasAuthorship W3136906341A5015488720 @default.
• W3136906341 hasAuthorship W3136906341A5016148532 @default.
• W3136906341 hasAuthorship W3136906341A5042623563 @default.
• W3136906341 hasAuthorship W3136906341A5044843735 @default.
• W3136906341 hasAuthorship W3136906341A5049721238 @default.
• W3136906341 hasAuthorship W3136906341A5049934032 @default.
• W3136906341 hasAuthorship W3136906341A5051030586 @default.
• W3136906341 hasAuthorship W3136906341A5085090784 @default.
• W3136906341 hasAuthorship W3136906341A5087340651 @default.
• W3136906341 hasBestOaLocation W31369063411 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C2777620619 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C2779925993 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C2987700449 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C2994136483 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C106906290 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C126838900 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C144024400 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C149923435 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C171606756 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C19527891 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C2777620619 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C2779925993 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C2780084366 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C2987700449 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C2989005 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C2994136483 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C512399662 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C70410870 @default.
• W3136906341 hasConceptScore W3136906341C71924100 @default.
• W3136906341 hasLocation W31369063411 @default.
• W3136906341 hasOpenAccess W3136906341 @default.
• W3136906341 hasPrimaryLocation W31369063411 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2005683696 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2076270380 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2100584354 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2106266770 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2110810403 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2188352056 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2309306525 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2315679470 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2417613798 @default.
• W3136906341 hasRelatedWork W2548635877 @default.
• W3136906341 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3136906341 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3136906341 magId "3136906341" @default.
• W3136906341 workType "article" @default.