FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3137619741> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3137619741 abstract "Abstract Background Implementation strategies have flourished in an effort to increase integration of research evidence into clinical practice. Most strategies are complex, socially mediated processes. Many are complicated, expensive, and ultimately impractical to deliver in real-world settings. The field lacks methods to assess the extent to which strategies are usable and aligned with the needs and constraints of the individuals and contexts who will deliver or receive them. Drawn from the field of human-centered design, cognitive walkthroughs are an efficient assessment method with potential to identify aspects of strategies that may inhibit their usability and, ultimately, effectiveness. This article presents a novel walkthrough methodology for evaluating strategy usability as well as an example application to a post-training consultation strategy to support school mental health clinicians to adopt measurement-based care. Method The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS) is a pragmatic, mixed-methods approach for evaluating complex, socially mediated implementation strategies. CWIS includes six steps: (1) determine preconditions; (2) hierarchical task analysis; (3) task prioritization; (4) convert tasks to scenarios; (5) pragmatic group testing; and (6) usability issue identification, classification, and prioritization. A facilitator conducted two group testing sessions with clinician users ( N = 10), guiding participants through 6 scenarios and 11 associated subtasks. Clinicians reported their anticipated likelihood of completing each subtask and provided qualitative justifications during group discussion. Following the walkthrough sessions, users completed an adapted quantitative assessment of strategy usability. Results Average anticipated success ratings indicated substantial variability across participants and subtasks. Usability ratings (scale 0–100) of the consultation protocol averaged 71.3 ( SD = 10.6). Twenty-one usability problems were identified via qualitative content analysis with consensus coding, and classified by severity and problem type. High-severity problems included potential misalignment between consultation and clinical service timelines as well as digressions during consultation processes. Conclusions CWIS quantitative usability ratings indicated that the consultation protocol was at the low end of the “acceptable” range (based on norms from the unadapted scale). Collectively, the 21 resulting usability issues explained the quantitative usability data and provided specific direction for usability enhancements. The current study provides preliminary evidence for the utility of CWIS to assess strategy usability and generate a blueprint for redesign." @default.
• W3137619741 created "2021-03-29" @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5023526660 @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5023701288 @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5039237396 @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5041250601 @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5041547107 @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5051882618 @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5058927674 @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5062906149 @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5068504623 @default.
• W3137619741 creator A5077352873 @default.
• W3137619741 date "2021-07-17" @default.
• W3137619741 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3137619741 title "The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability" @default.
• W3137619741 cites W139332684 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W1603430091 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W160573773 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W184072314 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W1877093828 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W19399978 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W1983374495 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W1990135477 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W1990580455 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W1999705655 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2003161643 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2010049072 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2012490185 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2028915923 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2030202010 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2043555414 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2048956741 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2052429590 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2074878819 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2075479340 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2087692971 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2100564574 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2102770197 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2105896748 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2125675643 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2126340581 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2127848723 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2128928578 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2130780981 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2137041566 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2140663693 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2142225512 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2165502748 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2170454054 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2280856219 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2443106973 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2508555717 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2612922341 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2801893528 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2900659870 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2901927177 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2904026243 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2905288370 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2912968992 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W2980059451 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W3087611735 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W3088139539 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W3110183584 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W3111128780 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W4229715839 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W4232706648 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W4245682088 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W43120215 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W4471378 @default.
• W3137619741 cites W3017338176 @default.
• W3137619741 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00183-0" @default.
• W3137619741 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8285864" @default.
• W3137619741 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34274027" @default.
• W3137619741 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3137619741 type Work @default.
• W3137619741 sameAs 3137619741 @default.
• W3137619741 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W3137619741 countsByYear W31376197412021 @default.
• W3137619741 countsByYear W31376197412022 @default.
• W3137619741 countsByYear W31376197412023 @default.
• W3137619741 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5023526660 @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5023701288 @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5039237396 @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5041250601 @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5041547107 @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5051882618 @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5058927674 @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5062906149 @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5068504623 @default.
• W3137619741 hasAuthorship W3137619741A5077352873 @default.
• W3137619741 hasBestOaLocation W31376197411 @default.
• W3137619741 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W3137619741 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3137619741 hasConcept C149091818 @default.
• W3137619741 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3137619741 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W3137619741 hasConcept C186846655 @default.
• W3137619741 hasConcept C188688815 @default.
• W3137619741 hasConcept C195094911 @default.

• next