Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3138124583> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3138124583 endingPage "e23866" @default.
- W3138124583 startingPage "e23866" @default.
- W3138124583 abstract "Background The decision to use patient portals can be influenced by multiple factors, including individuals’ perceptions of the tool, which are based on both their personal skills and experiences. Prior experience with one type of portal may make individuals more comfortable with using newer portal technologies. Experienced outpatient portal users in particular may have confidence in their ability to use inpatient portals that have similar functionality. In practice, the use of both outpatient and inpatient portal technologies can provide patients with continuity of access to their health information across care settings, but the influence of one type of portal use on the use of other portals has not been studied. Objective This study aims to understand how patients’ use of an inpatient portal is influenced by outpatient portal use. Methods This study included patients from an academic medical center who were provided access to an inpatient portal during their hospital stays between 2016 and 2018 (N=1571). We analyzed inpatient portal log files to investigate how inpatient portal use varied by using 3 categories of outpatient portal users: prior users, new users, and nonusers. Results Compared with prior users (695/1571, 44.24%) of an outpatient portal, new users (214/1571, 13.62%) had higher use of a select set of inpatient portal functions (messaging function: incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.67; function that provides access to the outpatient portal through the inpatient portal: IRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13-1.58). Nonusers (662/1571, 42.14%), compared with prior users, had lower overall inpatient portal use (all active functions: IRR 0.68, 95% CI 0.60-0.78) and lower use of specific functions, which included the function to review vitals and laboratory results (IRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.73) and the function to access the outpatient portal (IRR 0.53, 95% CI 0.45-0.62). In comparison with prior users, nonusers also had lower odds of being comprehensive users (defined as using 8 or more unique portal functions; odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.73) or composite users (defined as comprehensive users who initiated a 75th or greater percentile of portal sessions) of the inpatient portal (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29-0.60). Conclusions Patients’ use of an inpatient portal during their hospital stay appeared to be influenced by a combination of factors, including prior outpatient portal use. For new users, hospitalization itself, a major event that can motivate behavioral changes, may have influenced portal use. In contrast, nonusers might have lower self-efficacy in their ability to use technology to manage their health, contributing to their lower portal use. Understanding the relationship between the use of outpatient and inpatient portals can help direct targeted implementation strategies that encourage individuals to use these tools to better manage their health across care settings." @default.
- W3138124583 created "2021-03-29" @default.
- W3138124583 creator A5003451876 @default.
- W3138124583 creator A5030375028 @default.
- W3138124583 creator A5030751687 @default.
- W3138124583 creator A5040298384 @default.
- W3138124583 creator A5042147082 @default.
- W3138124583 creator A5065317618 @default.
- W3138124583 creator A5069988270 @default.
- W3138124583 date "2021-04-30" @default.
- W3138124583 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3138124583 title "Differential Effects of Outpatient Portal User Status on Inpatient Portal Use: Observational Study" @default.
- W3138124583 cites W1503436739 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W1975167942 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2004643894 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2042657352 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2048219065 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2062311620 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2064491641 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2076699559 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2088924539 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2132866589 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2139497806 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2145225199 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2150353123 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2168569455 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2170456782 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2431053090 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2558290742 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2601556514 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2742400819 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2777544428 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2809302982 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2900655321 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2905320534 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2907554434 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2911329340 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2913785884 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2929608793 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W2998545074 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W3004929482 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W3007380927 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W3035126535 @default.
- W3138124583 cites W3125976894 @default.
- W3138124583 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/23866" @default.
- W3138124583 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8122294" @default.
- W3138124583 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33929328" @default.
- W3138124583 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3138124583 type Work @default.
- W3138124583 sameAs 3138124583 @default.
- W3138124583 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W3138124583 countsByYear W31381245832022 @default.
- W3138124583 countsByYear W31381245832023 @default.
- W3138124583 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3138124583 hasAuthorship W3138124583A5003451876 @default.
- W3138124583 hasAuthorship W3138124583A5030375028 @default.
- W3138124583 hasAuthorship W3138124583A5030751687 @default.
- W3138124583 hasAuthorship W3138124583A5040298384 @default.
- W3138124583 hasAuthorship W3138124583A5042147082 @default.
- W3138124583 hasAuthorship W3138124583A5065317618 @default.
- W3138124583 hasAuthorship W3138124583A5069988270 @default.
- W3138124583 hasBestOaLocation W31381245831 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConcept C2775909303 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConcept C2776153502 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConceptScore W3138124583C126322002 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConceptScore W3138124583C160735492 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConceptScore W3138124583C162324750 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConceptScore W3138124583C194828623 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConceptScore W3138124583C23131810 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConceptScore W3138124583C2775909303 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConceptScore W3138124583C2776153502 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConceptScore W3138124583C50522688 @default.
- W3138124583 hasConceptScore W3138124583C71924100 @default.
- W3138124583 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W3138124583 hasLocation W31381245831 @default.
- W3138124583 hasLocation W31381245832 @default.
- W3138124583 hasOpenAccess W3138124583 @default.
- W3138124583 hasPrimaryLocation W31381245831 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W2025193597 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W2083479052 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W2765980456 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W2777544428 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W2905417968 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W2911329340 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W2912599248 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W2976382042 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W3036884098 @default.
- W3138124583 hasRelatedWork W4313294565 @default.
- W3138124583 hasVolume "23" @default.
- W3138124583 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3138124583 isRetracted "false" @default.