FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3138177639> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3138177639 endingPage "1008" @default.
• W3138177639 startingPage "1001" @default.
• W3138177639 abstract "The accuracy of digital scanning for complete dental arch and implant-supported complete-arch restorations has been reported. However, research addressing the accuracy of digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation is lacking.The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of intraoral scanning, impression scanning, and cast scanning for complete-arch preparation.Maxillary and mandibular jaw typodonts with 28 teeth prepared for complete crowns were used as reference casts and digitized as reference data sets with a desktop scanner. Three digital scanning methods were applied. First, the reference casts were each scanned 10 times with an intraoral scanner to generate the intraoral scanning group data sets. Second, the reference casts were each captured 10 times by using polyvinyl siloxane impression material, and the impressions were scanned with a desktop scanner to generate the impression scanning group data sets. Third, the impressions obtained in the impression scanning group were used to make gypsum casts which were then digitized with a desktop scanner to generate the cast scanning group data sets. Accuracy was determined by trueness and precision. Three-dimensional deviations of the prepared arches and anterior and posterior segments were measured from root mean square values and depicted on color-difference maps. Differences among test groups were analyzed by using a 1-way ANOVA and the post hoc Bonferroni test for normally distributed data or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for non-normally distributed data (α=.05).The trueness of the maxillary arch was significantly higher in the impression scanning group than in the cast scanning and intraoral scanning groups (P<.05), but no significant differences were found among the 3 groups of the mandibular arch (P>.05). The precision of both arches was significantly higher in the impression scanning and intraoral scanning groups than in the cast scanning group (P<.05). Color maps showed horizontal symmetrical displacement in the intraoral scanning group relative to the reference data sets and within-group unilateral distal-end distortion. Irregular arch deformations were noted in the impression scanning group, and buccal and occlusal expansion occurred in the anterior-posterior direction in the cast scanning group. Pooled data for anterior teeth indicated that the trueness was lowest in the intraoral scanning group; however, that for the maxillary anterior teeth did not differ, while that for the mandibular anterior teeth differed significantly among groups (P<.05). For the posterior teeth, deviation was the lowest in the impression scanning group, and significant differences were noted in both arches among the 3 groups (P<.05).Of the methods tested, impression scanning was the most accurate for the creation of a digital cast of a complete prepared arch." @default.
• W3138177639 created "2021-03-29" @default.
• W3138177639 creator A5034209191 @default.
• W3138177639 creator A5044625097 @default.
• W3138177639 creator A5053423673 @default.
• W3138177639 creator A5078071457 @default.
• W3138177639 creator A5081602567 @default.
• W3138177639 date "2022-11-01" @default.
• W3138177639 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W3138177639 title "Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison" @default.
• W3138177639 cites W1597483481 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W1966165297 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2029346012 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2045116074 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2046224987 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2049232578 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2063430532 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2129911095 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2147800395 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2179774036 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2300127018 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2341814833 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2587861424 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2784467233 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2794504581 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2801048413 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2905267490 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2908408733 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2938281142 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2947069387 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2947499337 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2950269094 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W2989648742 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W3003669441 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W3008972834 @default.
• W3138177639 cites W3014393737 @default.
• W3138177639 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.029" @default.
• W3138177639 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33736864" @default.
• W3138177639 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W3138177639 type Work @default.
• W3138177639 sameAs 3138177639 @default.
• W3138177639 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W3138177639 countsByYear W31381776392021 @default.
• W3138177639 countsByYear W31381776392022 @default.
• W3138177639 countsByYear W31381776392023 @default.
• W3138177639 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3138177639 hasAuthorship W3138177639A5034209191 @default.
• W3138177639 hasAuthorship W3138177639A5044625097 @default.
• W3138177639 hasAuthorship W3138177639A5053423673 @default.
• W3138177639 hasAuthorship W3138177639A5078071457 @default.
• W3138177639 hasAuthorship W3138177639A5081602567 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C11312509 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C2776684213 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C2777982226 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C2779751349 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C2992886853 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C11312509 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C127413603 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C136764020 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C147176958 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C154945302 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C199343813 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C2776684213 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C2777982226 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C2779751349 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C29694066 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C2992886853 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C33923547 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C41008148 @default.
• W3138177639 hasConceptScore W3138177639C71924100 @default.
• W3138177639 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3138177639 hasLocation W31381776391 @default.
• W3138177639 hasLocation W31381776392 @default.
• W3138177639 hasOpenAccess W3138177639 @default.
• W3138177639 hasPrimaryLocation W31381776391 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W2268838311 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W2889910358 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W2908408733 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W2947702470 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W2980769133 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W2995158875 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W3096193666 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W3131813981 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W3173418877 @default.
• W3138177639 hasRelatedWork W4286633547 @default.
• W3138177639 hasVolume "128" @default.
• W3138177639 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3138177639 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3138177639 magId "3138177639" @default.

• next