FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3138568325> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3138568325 endingPage "126" @default.
• W3138568325 startingPage "119" @default.
• W3138568325 abstract "Henry the Lion’s Artlenburg Charter (1161)The Artlenburg Charter of 1161, only transmitted in later copies, is unquestionably the most hotly disputed document of the twelfth Century. While one side views the charter as the founding document of the German Hanse, the other side focusses on the clauses inserted into the charter at a later date, which leads them to a completely different understanding of its significance. Among those in the latter group, Thomas Riis put forward the hypothesis that the Lübeck copy of the charter constitutes nothing less than an augmented version of the document with ,improving' additions to the text which was produced around 1225 by the Lübeck canon Marold, which Lübeck presented to Emperor Fredrich II in 1226 - together with a number of other Charters which Marold had ,improved‘ - in order to obtain the document known to scholars as the ,charter of imperial freedom’ (1226). The critical examination of Riis’s arguments demonstrates, however, that Lübeck never employed its copy of the Artlenburg charter to argue a point with an external authority, be it in 1226 or at any other subsequent time. This raises the question of why. and for whom, the copy was made. The town seal appended to the charter proves indubitably that it was executed on a mandate from the Lübeck town council. It was this body which ordered the Artlenburg charter (together with Henry the Lion’s mandate to the advocate charged with governing the German merchants on Gotland) to be copied into Lübecks Codex of Privileges, which was reserved for confidential use by councillors and merchants. The copy of the charter served to inform them of the conditions under which a permanent, peaceful settlement of the conflicts between Germans and Gotlanders had been reached under the tutelage of Henry the Lion, a settlement which opened trade in the Baltic for merchants sailing from Lübeck. The purpose of the copy was to keep Lübeck’s merchants precisely informed of each and every right they enjoyed (since these constituted the foundation of their trade), in order to be able to maintain those rights if conflicts arose in the future. Any change to the original text would have been suicidal. Therefore, we can be confident that the text which the copy transmits corresponds to the (lost) original in each and every particular." @default.
• W3138568325 created "2021-03-29" @default.
• W3138568325 creator A5042506468 @default.
• W3138568325 date "2020-07-14" @default.
• W3138568325 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3138568325 title "Wie verlässlich ist das Artlenburg-Privileg überliefert?" @default.
• W3138568325 doi "https://doi.org/10.21248/hgbll.2014.105" @default.
• W3138568325 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3138568325 type Work @default.
• W3138568325 sameAs 3138568325 @default.
• W3138568325 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3138568325 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3138568325 hasAuthorship W3138568325A5042506468 @default.
• W3138568325 hasBestOaLocation W31385683251 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C136815107 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C2775884135 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C2776501734 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C2777596936 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C111472728 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C136815107 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C138885662 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C142362112 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C154775046 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C166957645 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C17744445 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C195244886 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C199539241 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C2775884135 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C2776501734 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C2777596936 @default.
• W3138568325 hasConceptScore W3138568325C95457728 @default.
• W3138568325 hasLocation W31385683251 @default.
• W3138568325 hasOpenAccess W3138568325 @default.
• W3138568325 hasPrimaryLocation W31385683251 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W1007450593 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W2321289821 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W2321917864 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W2350907412 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W4233605780 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W4246487768 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W4360936500 @default.
• W3138568325 hasRelatedWork W644374803 @default.
• W3138568325 hasVolume "132" @default.
• W3138568325 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3138568325 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3138568325 magId "3138568325" @default.
• W3138568325 workType "article" @default.