FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3139088509> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3139088509 endingPage "109645" @default.
• W3139088509 startingPage "109645" @default.
• W3139088509 abstract "PurposeCone beam CT (CBCT) imaging assessment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in the angiosuite may improve stroke workflow and decrease time to recanalization. In order for this workflow to gain widespread acceptance, current CBCT imaging needs further development to improve image quality. Our study aimed to compare the image quality of a new CBCT protocol performed directly in the angiosuite with imaging from multidetector CT as a gold standard.MethodsAIS patients with an LVO who were candidates for endovascular treatment were prospectively included in this study. Following conventional multidetector CT (MDCT), patients underwent unenhanced cone beam CT (XperCT, Philips) imaging in the angiosuite, using two different protocols: a standard 20.8 s XperCT and/or an improved 10.4 s XperCT protocol. Images were evaluated using both qualitative and quantitative methods.ResultsWe included 65 patients in the study. Patients received CBCT imaging prior to endovascular treatment; 18 patients were assessed with a standard 20.8 s protocol scans and 47 with a newer 10.4 s scan. The quantitative analysis showed that the mean contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was significantly higher for the newer 10.4 s protocol compared with the 20.8 s protocol (2.08 +/- 0.64 vs. 1.15 +/- 0.27, p < 0.004) and the mean image noise was significantly lower for the 10.4 s XperCTs when compared with the 20.8 s XperCTs (6.30 +/- 1.34 vs. 7.82 +/- 2.03, p=<0.003). Qualitative analysis, including 6 measures of image quality, demonstrated that 74.1 % of the 10.4 s XperCT scans were ranked as ‘Acceptable’ for assessing parenchymal imaging in AIS patients(scoring 3–5 points on a 5-point Likert-scale), compared with 32.4 % of the standard 20.8 s XperCT and 100 % of the MDCT scans. Compared to the MDCT studies, 83 % of the 10.4 s XperCT scans were deemed sufficient image quality for a direct-to-angiosuite selection, compared to only 11 % for the standard 20.8 s scans. The largest image quality improvements included grey/white matter differentiation (59 % improvement), and reduction of image noise and artefacts (63 % & 50 % improvement, respectively).ConclusionsContinued advances in cone-beam CT allow marked improvements in image quality for the assessment of brain parenchyma, which supports a direct-to-angiosuite approach for AIS patients eligible for thrombectomy treatment." @default.
• W3139088509 created "2021-03-29" @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5004433893 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5010284754 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5019478767 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5027268673 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5037128586 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5039984681 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5041590267 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5045125526 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5054093917 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5071298858 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5080923738 @default.
• W3139088509 creator A5083818499 @default.
• W3139088509 date "2021-05-01" @default.
• W3139088509 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W3139088509 title "Novel flat-panel cone-beam CT compared to multi-detector CT for assessment of acute ischemic stroke: A prospective study" @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2000441297 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2009849279 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2037399775 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2068068894 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2080924368 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2087099103 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2140442139 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2147053638 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2157812230 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2166089786 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2277258071 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2339784325 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2340716980 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2537954399 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2617106270 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2793216778 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2892069703 @default.
• W3139088509 cites W2953484553 @default.
• W3139088509 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109645" @default.
• W3139088509 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33725654" @default.
• W3139088509 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3139088509 type Work @default.
• W3139088509 sameAs 3139088509 @default.
• W3139088509 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W3139088509 countsByYear W31390885092021 @default.
• W3139088509 countsByYear W31390885092022 @default.
• W3139088509 countsByYear W31390885092023 @default.
• W3139088509 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5004433893 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5010284754 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5019478767 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5027268673 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5037128586 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5039984681 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5041590267 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5045125526 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5054093917 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5071298858 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5080923738 @default.
• W3139088509 hasAuthorship W3139088509A5083818499 @default.
• W3139088509 hasBestOaLocation W31390885091 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C2779813781 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C3018399558 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C35772409 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C94898600 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConcept C94915269 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C115961682 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C119599485 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C126838900 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C127413603 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C141071460 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C154945302 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C188816634 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C2779813781 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C2780645631 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C2989005 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C3018399558 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C35772409 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C40993552 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C41008148 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C544519230 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C55020928 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C71924100 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C78519656 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C94898600 @default.
• W3139088509 hasConceptScore W3139088509C94915269 @default.

• next