FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3140850532> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3140850532 abstract "Increased activity in vocational (VET) and higher education institutions to negotiate credit arrangements between their courses is designed to provide a seamless pathway for students into their next level of learning. This study explores the credit negotiation process between a Technical and Further Education (TAFE) and a University to identify the factors that influence the construction, realisation and containment of credit which influence the potential transition of students between VET courses and Bachelor degrees. The research draws on literature that reviews the distinguishing features of the two education institutions with particular attention totheir distinct knowledge traditions. It reviews literature around the recognition of knowledge within academic institutions and identifies the features that have been found to influence credit negotiation between education institutions and sectors. Underpinned by a qualitative approach employing a case study methodology, two cases examining the credit negotiation process between a TAFE Institute and a University in Australia are described. The cases draw on observation of twoworkshops and interviews with the 10 educators who took part in the negotiation process and who were positioned across TAFE and Higher Education. Four key themes emerge which influence the construction, realisation and containment of credit. They are i) the values ascribed to academic and vocational knowledge; ii) the binding rules of credit within Higher Education which determinedthe amount of credit given; iii) the educators acting as agents of their institution; and iv) the educational values and orientation of the educators involved in the negotiation process. The study suggests that establishing the equivalence of the courses is impeded by the contrasting beliefs of the TAFE and University educators around the value of academic knowledge within University courses and the vocational knowledge within TAFE courses. The University, and its traditions, set the conditi,ons for, and parameters of, the credit exercise and emerged as authoritative in the negotiation process. By implication, the study highlights that the concept of seamless transition between education institutions, through credit transfer, is by no means smooth. It is subject to barriers that influence the construction of credit transfer arrangements which, in turn, affects its ultimate realisation for potential transitioning students. Awards: Vice-Chancellor’s Commendation for Masters Thesis Excellence in 2013." @default.
• W3140850532 created "2021-04-13" @default.
• W3140850532 creator A5050567017 @default.
• W3140850532 date "2017-02-27" @default.
• W3140850532 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3140850532 title "Negotiating credit transfer: an examination of institutional practices" @default.
• W3140850532 doi "https://doi.org/10.4225/03/58b4a4e00e15c" @default.
• W3140850532 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W3140850532 type Work @default.
• W3140850532 sameAs 3140850532 @default.
• W3140850532 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3140850532 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W3140850532 hasAuthorship W3140850532A5050567017 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C2777626052 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C2780510313 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConcept C668760 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C120912362 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C144024400 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C17744445 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C19417346 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C199539241 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C199776023 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C2777626052 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C2780510313 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C36289849 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C39549134 @default.
• W3140850532 hasConceptScore W3140850532C668760 @default.
• W3140850532 hasLocation W31408505321 @default.
• W3140850532 hasOpenAccess W3140850532 @default.
• W3140850532 hasPrimaryLocation W31408505321 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W1530292773 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W1536561050 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W182674961 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W1971822769 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2004802157 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2007113591 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2037972967 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2088832334 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2117285862 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2132090062 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2148301689 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2757107407 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2765345279 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2903632885 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W293348248 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2978403572 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2982590712 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W327552229 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2154888916 @default.
• W3140850532 hasRelatedWork W2596706099 @default.
• W3140850532 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3140850532 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3140850532 magId "3140850532" @default.
• W3140850532 workType "dissertation" @default.