FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3142267260> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3142267260 abstract "ABSTRACT On 1 January 1995, the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (Dispute Settlement Understanding; DSU) entered into force. Since 1998, negotiations to review and reform the DSU have taken place (DSU review), however without yielding any result so far. The DSU review exercise has only attracted limited academic interest to date. This lack of interest in Members’ proposals and negotiations is rather astonishing, particularly if judged in the light of the general explosion of literature on the World Trade Organization (WTO), including on its dispute settlement system. Whereas even single adjudicating decisions such as the rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle or the Bananas cases have each become the subject of countless contributions, the efforts of the entire WTO community to make the DSU evolve further have long been neglected. Only recently, a certain academic interest in these negotiations and in the submitted proposals can be noticed. The over-emphasis of the DSU literature on rulings and recommendations, and the parallel lack of interest in the political discussions on the DSU, is questionable from both an analytical and a practical perspective. From the analytical point of view, it creates a general perception in which the role of the adjudicating bodies tends to be chronically overstated and where the intergovernmental, memberdriven character of the WTO is largely overlooked. Practically, such a distorted assessment may lead to policy recommendations or actions which are out of tune with political realities and which may undermine the sustainability of the system. The DSU review negotiations, albeit unsuccessful so far, have brought forth a variety of proposals in the last seven years. These submissions are supposed to contribute to improvements and clarifications of the mechanism. Not only is the DSU review of interest in its own right, but it also offers a reflection of the experience that WTO Members have gathered in 10 years of dispute settlement practice. In doing so, the discussions are revealing with regard to the general degree of satisfaction of Members with the system. They can also serve as an indicator for problems or tensions in the mechanism and for changes in the position of certain Members in and towards the system. Finally, the DSU review discussions assist us in establishing some hypotheses on the future evolution of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. This chapter seeks to contribute to the DSU literature by retracing the negotiating process in its context and by analyzing the main reasons why the negotiations have failed so far. Part 1 analyzes the negotiations that have taken place between 1997 and 2004. In Part 2, the reasons for the failure to bring the negotiations to a successful conclusion so far will be discussed, based on a brief presentation of major proposals. Part 3 presents some elements of a “DSU Review in practice”, ie practical steps that Members and adjudicating bodies have undertaken to adapt DSU practice to changing circumstances and requirements without modifying the text of the DSU. Part 5 concludes with the following. The last chapter offers some conclusions from the preceding analysis." @default.
• W3142267260 created "2021-04-13" @default.
• W3142267260 creator A5061605447 @default.
• W3142267260 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W3142267260 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3142267260 title "The DSU Review (1998-2004): Negotiations, Problems and Perspectives" @default.
• W3142267260 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W3142267260 type Work @default.
• W3142267260 sameAs 3142267260 @default.
• W3142267260 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3142267260 countsByYear W31422672602012 @default.
• W3142267260 countsByYear W31422672602013 @default.
• W3142267260 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3142267260 hasAuthorship W3142267260A5061605447 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C2777063073 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C10138342 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C144133560 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C145097563 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C161191863 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C162324750 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C17744445 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C190253527 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C199539241 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C199776023 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C2777063073 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C2777855551 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C41008148 @default.
• W3142267260 hasConceptScore W3142267260C94625758 @default.
• W3142267260 hasLocation W31422672601 @default.
• W3142267260 hasOpenAccess W3142267260 @default.
• W3142267260 hasPrimaryLocation W31422672601 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W161772381 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W188862652 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W1911020709 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2003906728 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2022698352 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2099663558 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2181496049 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2271355852 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2347484683 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2389444288 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2492034241 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2530070683 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2560381304 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W2771991031 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W3122964024 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W3123973793 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W3125873204 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W346796491 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W632793091 @default.
• W3142267260 hasRelatedWork W643535645 @default.
• W3142267260 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3142267260 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3142267260 magId "3142267260" @default.
• W3142267260 workType "article" @default.