FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3145653226> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3145653226 endingPage "731" @default.
• W3145653226 startingPage "731" @default.
• W3145653226 abstract "Hanna and Pantanowitz have presented a very well-written and informative summary to answer the above question.1 I have several comments. It is a given that image acquisition from cytopathology glass slides represents a greater challenge because of the distribution of material on multiple focal planes between the glass slide and coverslip. It may be difficult to focus into cell collections on resulting whole-slide imaging (WSI). z-stacking is an option, but can never perfectly match the infinite vertical focus provided by a traditional microscope and glass slide. In addition, the more z-stacks on WSI, the greater the file size and often the more cumbersome the viewing. However, there usually are thousands of cells on a cytology slide; it is unusual to make a diagnosis from just 1 or 2 small foci on the slide. So it may be that we need to reexamine digital cytopathology with a fresh pair of “lenses.” A different approach may be required, such as acquiring 2 separate WSI files scanned at different focal depths from the one original glass slide. Alternatively, one may crop and extract adequately scanned areas prior to diagnosis; after all, even with traditional cytopathology, there always is cellular material left behind in the preservative fluid or on the sampling utensil, which the pathologist never actually views. Others have found that digitizing less than the entire glass specimen did not compromise accuracy.2 Using 2-dimensional WSI to facilitate learning or the diagnosis of cytopathology cases has been found to be comparable to traditional microscopy.2-4 Cytopathology WSI with multiple focal planes may even be superior to the equivalent glass slides for diagnostic accuracy.5 The issue is more our perception. It is almost universally perceived that diagnostic accuracy using WSI does not match the accuracy achieved with a glass slide and a traditional microscope. It takes longer to report WSI compared with a glass slide.2, 5, 6 However, there also is a definite learning curve when using WSI: increased diagnostic accuracy3, 4 and increased time efficacy6 come with increased WSI use and familiarity. Ergonomics for screening cytopathology slides also can be readily addressed. Becoming accustomed to an altered approach may simply be the answer. We need to try it, familiarize ourselves with it, and then validate it (case-by-case to start with). Then, if the technique is not inferior in accuracy and safety for our patients compared with traditional techniques, perhaps we should go with it. No specific funding was disclosed. The author made no disclosures. Simone L. Van Es, MBBS, PhD, FRCPA, Grad Dip Med, Cert FPA Department of Pathology School of Medical Sciences The University of New South Wales Sydney, New South Wales, Australia" @default.
• W3145653226 created "2021-04-13" @default.
• W3145653226 creator A5067702114 @default.
• W3145653226 date "2017-06-28" @default.
• W3145653226 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3145653226 title "Why is digital pathology in cytopathology lagging behind surgical pathology?" @default.
• W3145653226 cites W1790241540 @default.
• W3145653226 cites W2072947916 @default.
• W3145653226 cites W2094813843 @default.
• W3145653226 cites W2142789013 @default.
• W3145653226 cites W2222756974 @default.
• W3145653226 cites W2611326398 @default.
• W3145653226 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21889" @default.
• W3145653226 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28657657" @default.
• W3145653226 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W3145653226 type Work @default.
• W3145653226 sameAs 3145653226 @default.
• W3145653226 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3145653226 countsByYear W31456532262018 @default.
• W3145653226 countsByYear W31456532262019 @default.
• W3145653226 countsByYear W31456532262022 @default.
• W3145653226 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3145653226 hasAuthorship W3145653226A5067702114 @default.
• W3145653226 hasBestOaLocation W31456532261 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C18823058 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C192209626 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C194495517 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C2777522853 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C2778654104 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C120665830 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C121332964 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C142724271 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C18823058 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C192209626 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C194495517 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C19527891 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C2777522853 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C2778654104 @default.
• W3145653226 hasConceptScore W3145653226C71924100 @default.
• W3145653226 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W3145653226 hasLocation W31456532261 @default.
• W3145653226 hasLocation W31456532262 @default.
• W3145653226 hasOpenAccess W3145653226 @default.
• W3145653226 hasPrimaryLocation W31456532261 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W2050414093 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W2053874891 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W2164582755 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W2473079761 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W2611326398 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W2903390938 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W3089020072 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W3145653226 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W4214948555 @default.
• W3145653226 hasRelatedWork W632563310 @default.
• W3145653226 hasVolume "125" @default.
• W3145653226 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3145653226 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3145653226 magId "3145653226" @default.
• W3145653226 workType "article" @default.