FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3147050211> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3147050211 endingPage "81" @default.
• W3147050211 startingPage "51" @default.
• W3147050211 abstract "This paper examines whether the scale advantage of auditing firms can be used as an alternative indicator of audit quality when the evaluation of audit quality is costly. The adoption of asset impairment recognition in China has brought about a considerable impact on financial reporting of Chinese listing companies in recent years. This new accounting practice provided a special environment, which was subjected to less endogeneity problems than usual, to test the relationship between the scale of auditing business and audit quality. Prior research reported empirical evidence that both market value and firm characteristics are empirically related to write-downs, reflected in the four dimensions return relevance, price relevance, persistence and determinant. Using these four dimensions, we investigated whether audit business scale advantage(ABSA) affect audit quality of asset write-downs. We contribute to the literature with the following findings. First, auditors’ business scale is positively related to return relevance of write-downs. Second, auditors with ABSA not only enhance the relevance between impairments and economic variables but also weaken the relation between impairments and managerial variables; however, the results appear in only a few of the firm-specific variables. Third, results are mixed when we test the ABSA effect on price-relevance and persistence dimensions. Fourth, the ABSA effect is stronger when the complexity of asset write-downs requires some inside information to comprehend the nature of action. Adding to the main finding, we also found the ABSA effect became weaker when we proxy ABSA with raw data of companies’ business scale instead of the top five auditors in business scale. Taken together, our results show that the ABSA effect does exist in auditing of assets write-downs, although with weak evidence. Our results also indicated rational auditor choice based on quality of service in China’s audit market. We identified some unique factors from stakeholders’ cooperative structur" @default.
• W3147050211 created "2021-04-13" @default.
• W3147050211 creator A5001978013 @default.
• W3147050211 creator A5032483419 @default.
• W3147050211 creator A5041573611 @default.
• W3147050211 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W3147050211 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3147050211 title "The Association between Audit Business Scale Advantage and Audit Quality of Asset Write-downs" @default.
• W3147050211 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W3147050211 type Work @default.
• W3147050211 sameAs 3147050211 @default.
• W3147050211 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3147050211 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3147050211 hasAuthorship W3147050211A5001978013 @default.
• W3147050211 hasAuthorship W3147050211A5032483419 @default.
• W3147050211 hasAuthorship W3147050211A5041573611 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C140181557 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C610760 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConcept C76178495 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C121955636 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C140181557 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C144133560 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C149782125 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C162118730 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C162324750 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C199521495 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C38652104 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C41008148 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C610760 @default.
• W3147050211 hasConceptScore W3147050211C76178495 @default.
• W3147050211 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3147050211 hasLocation W31470502111 @default.
• W3147050211 hasOpenAccess W3147050211 @default.
• W3147050211 hasPrimaryLocation W31470502111 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W1498070873 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W1556642356 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2009733045 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2043086836 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2053434966 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2122095216 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2126322400 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2611068815 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2736255472 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2736645518 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W292735174 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2971807402 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2972129039 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2977882473 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W3126020707 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W3133511529 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W3213680814 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W58746682 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W1540749389 @default.
• W3147050211 hasRelatedWork W2047679355 @default.
• W3147050211 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3147050211 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3147050211 magId "3147050211" @default.
• W3147050211 workType "article" @default.