Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3148069605> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W3148069605 abstract "This article compares the economic assessments conducted by judicial practice on single branding/exclusive dealing cases between the EU and the U.S. in order to gain insights on how to improve the effects-based approach to competition law. Generally speaking, the U.S. judicial practice presented a more integrated approach to examine the practical effects caused by exclusive dealing arrangements than its EU as well as Taiwanese counterpart. The U.S. cases Tampa and Standard Stations laid down the requirement to weigh the anti-competitive effect with all relevant factors taken into account. More recent cases exemplified the incorporation of the theory of Raising Rivals’ Cost (RRC) into assessment of contested conducts, which enriched the analysis of the practical effects on barriers to entry.In contrast, the EU case law has still been taking a more formalistic approach. Though it is widely acknowledged that analysis of effects on restriction of competition is required as to single branding agreements under Art. 101 TFEU, Delimitis as the leading case failed to clarify the economic logic behind and the economic relationship between the factors required to be examined. The application of Art. 102 TFEU before Intel is close to a per se standard. However, the turn of Van den Bergh and Intel to more consideration of the effect on cost of existing or potential competitors deserves more observation as to future developments. It is argued that the U.S. practice can shed light on EU competition law in two perspectives. Firstly, the test of Delimitis needs to be restructured to examine and weigh the effect of the contested agreements. Secondly, the approach for Art. 102 TFEU could be developed through adoption of similar tests with those conducted in application of Art. 101 TFEU, where assessment of barriers to entry is crucial." @default.
- W3148069605 created "2021-04-13" @default.
- W3148069605 creator A5007940996 @default.
- W3148069605 date "2020-12-21" @default.
- W3148069605 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3148069605 title "Towards the Effects-based Approach in EU Competition Law: the Assessment of Single Branding Agreements" @default.
- W3148069605 doi "https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/zgv4d" @default.
- W3148069605 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3148069605 type Work @default.
- W3148069605 sameAs 3148069605 @default.
- W3148069605 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3148069605 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W3148069605 hasAuthorship W3148069605A5007940996 @default.
- W3148069605 hasBestOaLocation W31480696052 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C127576917 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C18547055 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C2776736423 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C2780589192 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C2781127519 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C40700 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConcept C91306197 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C10138342 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C127413603 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C127576917 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C144133560 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C162324750 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C162853370 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C170706310 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C17744445 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C182306322 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C18547055 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C18903297 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C190253527 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C199539241 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C2776736423 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C2780589192 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C2781127519 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C34447519 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C40700 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C78519656 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C86803240 @default.
- W3148069605 hasConceptScore W3148069605C91306197 @default.
- W3148069605 hasLocation W31480696051 @default.
- W3148069605 hasLocation W31480696052 @default.
- W3148069605 hasLocation W31480696053 @default.
- W3148069605 hasLocation W31480696054 @default.
- W3148069605 hasLocation W31480696055 @default.
- W3148069605 hasOpenAccess W3148069605 @default.
- W3148069605 hasPrimaryLocation W31480696051 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W1532829210 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W3020975262 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W3120439107 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W3124671891 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W3124840156 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W3148069605 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W3152225782 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W3185599302 @default.
- W3148069605 hasRelatedWork W3212990620 @default.
- W3148069605 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3148069605 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3148069605 magId "3148069605" @default.
- W3148069605 workType "article" @default.