Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W314877816> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 62 of
62
with 100 items per page.
- W314877816 startingPage "1" @default.
- W314877816 abstract "ABSTRACT Scale items used in previous studies of student perceptions of faculty ethical behavior were administered to a sample of undergraduate business students in order to assess the dimensionality of these perceptions. Results suggest five distinct dimensions of student perceptions of faculty ethical behavior. These empirically derived dimensions were then related to three outcome variables, satisfaction with the university, intent to remain in the current degree program, and intent to transfer to another university. Results of this analysis suggest that one dimension of faculty ethical behavior is related to student satisfaction with the university, and that satisfaction, in turn, was related to student intent to transfer to a different university. INTRODUCTION Recent developments in business (e.g., Enron, Adelphia, Tyco, WorldCom, and Andersen Consulting) and politics (e.g., the expulsion of James Traficant from the House of Representatives, and the recent Letter of Admonition from the U.S. Senate Ethics Committee to Senator Robert G. Torricelli) has brought ethics to the forefront of public debate and media attention. However, while several scholars have suggested that teaching is rife with ethical dilemmas (Svinicki, 1994), relatively little empirical research has been conducted on ethics in academia (Tabachnick, Keith-Spiegel & Pope, 1991; Keith-Spiegel, Tabachnick, and Allen, 1993). The little research on faculty ethical behavior which has been conducted has typically focused on such topics as sexual harassment and has largely ignored the many daily ethical dilemmas which occur in faculty-student interactions (Tabachnick, Keith-Spiegel & Pope, 1991). Surprisingly, there is very little research on student perceptions of faculty ethical behavior, and the outcomes of those perceptions (Morgan & Korschgen, 2001). The few studies which have addressed student perceptions of faculty ethical behavior have ignored significant methodological issues, such as the dimensionality of the rating instrument used to assess student perceptions, and the validity and reliability of the measurement. The primary purpose of this study is to improve the measurement of student perceptions of faculty ethical behavior. Items from previous questionnaires related to a narrow range of faculty behaviors dealing with the professor-student interaction as well as additional items to more fully capture this domain will be examined for content validity, dimensionality, and reliability. Identifying dimensions of student perceived faculty ethical behavior will enable researchers to create a valid and reliable scale which can then be used to examine outcomes of student perceptions, such as student retention. Relationships between these empirically-derived dimensions of student perceived faculty ethical behavior and selected outcome variables (student course satisfaction and intent to remain in their current degree program or retention) will then be examined. ETHICAL BEHAVIOR Ethical behavior is rather difficult to define precisely given its origin in personal, organizational and societal values (Ball, 2001). Not that long ago, ethics was defined largely in terms of complying with the law. While, expectations have risen in recent years, it is difficult to draw a precise line between what is generally considered ethical behavior, and what is not. In a general sense, what is considered ethical behavior is what most people would consider right and wrong. Clearly, different groups may define ethical behavior differently. Therefore, one determinant of ethical behavior is the context within which it occurs. Ethical behavior in one industry or occupation may be quite different from another. Ultimately, an individual's ethics are his or her beliefs about what is right or wrong, good or bad (Garrett & Klonoski, 1992). Thus, an individual's actual ethical behavior is influenced by his or her personal beliefs and values, the climate of the organization, as well as society's values. …" @default.
- W314877816 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W314877816 creator A5016037659 @default.
- W314877816 creator A5021200025 @default.
- W314877816 creator A5038683785 @default.
- W314877816 date "2004-05-01" @default.
- W314877816 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W314877816 title "Dimensions of Student Perceptions of Faculty Ethical Behavior: Refining a Measure and Relationships with Selected Outcome Variables" @default.
- W314877816 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W314877816 type Work @default.
- W314877816 sameAs 314877816 @default.
- W314877816 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W314877816 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W314877816 hasAuthorship W314877816A5016037659 @default.
- W314877816 hasAuthorship W314877816A5021200025 @default.
- W314877816 hasAuthorship W314877816A5038683785 @default.
- W314877816 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W314877816 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W314877816 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W314877816 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W314877816 hasConcept C2778976716 @default.
- W314877816 hasConcept C2991670904 @default.
- W314877816 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
- W314877816 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W314877816 hasConceptScore W314877816C15744967 @default.
- W314877816 hasConceptScore W314877816C169760540 @default.
- W314877816 hasConceptScore W314877816C17744445 @default.
- W314877816 hasConceptScore W314877816C26760741 @default.
- W314877816 hasConceptScore W314877816C2778976716 @default.
- W314877816 hasConceptScore W314877816C2991670904 @default.
- W314877816 hasConceptScore W314877816C3116431 @default.
- W314877816 hasConceptScore W314877816C77805123 @default.
- W314877816 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W314877816 hasLocation W3148778161 @default.
- W314877816 hasOpenAccess W314877816 @default.
- W314877816 hasPrimaryLocation W3148778161 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W101982461 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W106834670 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W133086351 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W1526443105 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W1526619346 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W1535683092 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W1546191879 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W183130214 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W2033794092 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W2053632449 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W2129268689 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W2133745832 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W271182729 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W2924127689 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W3123020503 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W3123286440 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W3158262237 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W345350571 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W44468016 @default.
- W314877816 hasRelatedWork W795804421 @default.
- W314877816 hasVolume "8" @default.
- W314877816 isParatext "false" @default.
- W314877816 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W314877816 magId "314877816" @default.
- W314877816 workType "article" @default.