FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3149163657> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3149163657 abstract "Dear Editor,We read with great interest the recent article titled “Non-continuous versus continuous wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a meta- analysis” that was accepted in September 2013 of International Orthopaedics [1]. Li et al. performed a meta-analysis to evaluate non-continuous versus continuous wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is a valuable study: however, there are some comments we would like to raise related to this article.The electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and WANFANG) were systematically searched by the authors for randomised controlled trials (RCT). Nevertheless, the authors did not focus specifically or in any detail on the issue of the completeness of the search strategy report for databases, which plays an important role in systematic reviews.Manual searches were not clearly stated. The lack of a manual search protocol may be considered a weakness of the meta-analysis.It is not sufficient that publication bias was only assessed by visual examination of the funnel plot. Funnel plot symmetry should be further assessed by statistical tests (e.g. Egger’s linear regression test or Begg’s rank correlation test). Moreover, publication bias was only based on haemoglobin loss. In fact, publication bias should be assessed for postoperative visible blood loss, incidence of blood transfusion and complications.There are many kinds of prostheses used in TKA, which might bring different results. If possible, we suggest that a meta-analysis of non-continuous versus continuous wound drainage after TKA with different prostheses be conducted.The authors clearly stated that: “a random-effects model was adopted and further subgroup analysis or sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity”; and the pooled analysis of haemoglobin loss between the two groups showed low heterogeneity. However, a sensitivity analysis was conducted in this analysis even though the heterogeneity was low and a fixed-effects model was used.In conclusion, we agree with the results of this meta-analysis by Li et al. Non-continuous drainage can achieve less haemoglobin loss and postoperative visible blood loss with continuous drainage. Further high-quality RCTs based on larger sample sizes are still needed to confirm the claim." @default.
• W3149163657 created "2021-04-13" @default.
• W3149163657 creator A5056450584 @default.
• W3149163657 creator A5061581158 @default.
• W3149163657 creator A5079534445 @default.
• W3149163657 creator A5087404353 @default.
• W3149163657 creator A5089005902 @default.
• W3149163657 date "2013-11-06" @default.
• W3149163657 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3149163657 title "Comment on Li et al. Non-continuous versus continuous wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a meta- analysis" @default.
• W3149163657 cites W1975183163 @default.
• W3149163657 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2160-6" @default.
• W3149163657 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3890117" @default.
• W3149163657 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24202213" @default.
• W3149163657 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W3149163657 type Work @default.
• W3149163657 sameAs 3149163657 @default.
• W3149163657 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W3149163657 countsByYear W31491636572015 @default.
• W3149163657 countsByYear W31491636572018 @default.
• W3149163657 countsByYear W31491636572019 @default.
• W3149163657 countsByYear W31491636572020 @default.
• W3149163657 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3149163657 hasAuthorship W3149163657A5056450584 @default.
• W3149163657 hasAuthorship W3149163657A5061581158 @default.
• W3149163657 hasAuthorship W3149163657A5079534445 @default.
• W3149163657 hasAuthorship W3149163657A5087404353 @default.
• W3149163657 hasAuthorship W3149163657A5089005902 @default.
• W3149163657 hasBestOaLocation W31491636571 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C2780439572 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C82605166 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C126322002 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C141071460 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C17744445 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C189708586 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C199539241 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C2776478404 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C2778336525 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C2779473830 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C2780439572 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C68312169 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C71924100 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C82605166 @default.
• W3149163657 hasConceptScore W3149163657C95190672 @default.
• W3149163657 hasLocation W31491636571 @default.
• W3149163657 hasLocation W31491636572 @default.
• W3149163657 hasLocation W31491636573 @default.
• W3149163657 hasLocation W31491636574 @default.
• W3149163657 hasOpenAccess W3149163657 @default.
• W3149163657 hasPrimaryLocation W31491636571 @default.
• W3149163657 hasRelatedWork W2062169136 @default.
• W3149163657 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3149163657 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3149163657 magId "3149163657" @default.
• W3149163657 workType "article" @default.