Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3149243318> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 76 of
76
with 100 items per page.
- W3149243318 abstract "BACKGROUND: Attempts at assessing surgical proficiency have generally used laboratory simulation to evaluate skill. The aim of this study was to compare technical ability as measured on a bench simulation with actual operative performance. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-two general surgeons and trainees were recruited: consultants (n 4), specialist registrars (n 14), and senior house officers (n 4). They were assessed while performing a saphenofemoral dissection on an anesthetized patient in the operating theater, and performing the same procedure on an inanimate model within the laboratory. The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill method, consisting of a 7-parameter global rating (maximum score 35) and 17-point step-by-step checklist (maximum score 17) was used to measure performance in both environments. Face, content, and construct validity of the synthetic model were established as part of this study. RESULTS: There was a significant relationship between technical skill as measured on the bench test model and performance within the operating theater with respect to both global rating (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.824, p 0.001; coefficient 0.89) and checklist ratings (r 0.514, p 0.02; coefficient 0.68) rating assessments. Global rating scores correlated with experience for both operative (r 0.822, p 0.001) and bench (r 0.515, p 0.05) settings. There was no difference in level of measured performance between operating theater and bench model (global rating mean 23.25 6.66 versus 23.75 5.62, respectively; paired t-test p 0.559). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of technical skill using inanimate procedural simulation translates to actual surgical performance within the operating theater. This further validates use of bench test evaluations to measure surgical technical ability. ( J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:603–606. © 2004 by the American College of Surgeons)" @default.
- W3149243318 created "2021-04-13" @default.
- W3149243318 creator A5060103247 @default.
- W3149243318 date "2004-01-01" @default.
- W3149243318 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3149243318 title "omparison of Bench Test Evaluations of Surgical kill with Live Operating Performance Assessments" @default.
- W3149243318 cites W1967929908 @default.
- W3149243318 cites W1993678914 @default.
- W3149243318 cites W2014530475 @default.
- W3149243318 cites W2045172869 @default.
- W3149243318 cites W2086823319 @default.
- W3149243318 cites W2113363549 @default.
- W3149243318 cites W92566331 @default.
- W3149243318 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W3149243318 type Work @default.
- W3149243318 sameAs 3149243318 @default.
- W3149243318 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3149243318 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3149243318 hasAuthorship W3149243318A5060103247 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C105795698 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C151730666 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C15744967 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C171606756 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C180747234 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C1862650 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C19527891 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C2777267654 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C2779356329 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C33923547 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C49453240 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C70410870 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C71924100 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C83849319 @default.
- W3149243318 hasConceptScore W3149243318C86803240 @default.
- W3149243318 hasLocation W31492433181 @default.
- W3149243318 hasOpenAccess W3149243318 @default.
- W3149243318 hasPrimaryLocation W31492433181 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W1969972986 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2019646017 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2030042074 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2041842176 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2076383740 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2090884181 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2109498513 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2130047516 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2137837935 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2180780832 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2257411045 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2272017371 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2319593505 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2331199300 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2418414724 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2791218621 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2894101758 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2936229640 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W3011766414 @default.
- W3149243318 hasRelatedWork W2778972169 @default.
- W3149243318 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3149243318 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3149243318 magId "3149243318" @default.
- W3149243318 workType "article" @default.