FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W314962444> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W314962444 startingPage "1" @default.
• W314962444 abstract "jazz, his is not very interesting. He is a capable but rather anonymous sounding player with an undistinguished sound on the tenor, occasional intonation problems on the soprano, and a determinedly low-keyed approach.... and at present the saxophonist is the best-selling artist on Taylor's CTI label. --New York Times, February 13, 1977 Despite the fact that it commands a large portion of the jazz marketplace, smooth jazz has become the elephant in the room in jazz studies--its absence from contemporary jazz scholarship is made all the more conspicuous by its ubiquity in contemporary society. With a few exceptions, there has been little discussion of its history, characteristics, or reception within the discipline. What notice it has received has come mainly from the popular press, and even there it is often dismissed as being too commercial to be substantial. Throughout its development, various terms have been used to describe this music, many of which betray its apparent lack of legitimacy: jazz-pop, light jazz, jazz-lite, or just crossover. latter term in particular references the style's self-conscious positioning within the market, and highlights its intent to appeal to both jazz and mainstream (i.e., non-jazz) listeners alike. As the opening quote illustrates, this commercialism often stands in direct contrast to the critical reception of the music, and continues to undermine musicians' attempts to establish the as a serious musical genre with respect to jazz and popular criticism. For example, in 1977, New York Times critic Robert Palmer quips: The best way to listen to jazz pop is to forget that many jazz fans consider it a failed art music (Palmer 1977). Following recent developments in jazz and black research, I argue that giving preference to historical narratives that favor Eurocentric ideas of autonomy and unity over sociological, popular, or even commercial concerns serves only to undermine the richness and complexity of the jazz idioms as a whole (Ake 2002; 2007; DeVeaux 1997; Ramsey 2003). This article is not meant as an apology for what has traditionally been a marginalized style within the discipline; rather, I hope to lend my voice to the growing chorus of recent jazz scholarship that aims to open up a space for the discussion of crossover genres, such as smooth jazz, and to reimagine a jazz history that includes such varied expressions of the jazz experience. Toward a Definition of Smooth Jazz Like other designations in jazz, the term smooth jazz is slippery and contested. phrase is itself an arbitrary industry buzzword: the product of record label executives, marketing firms, and focus groups. With the radio and recording industries at a loss as to how to market this increasingly popular genre in the early 1990s, California-based consulting firm Broadcast Architecture was brought in to organize a focus group in order to address the problem of branding this musical trend. As Frank Cody, the consultant in charge of the group, explains in a recent Boston Globe interview: It was actually a listener [who put the words together].... At that moment, light bulbs went off over everybody's heads (Rodman 2006). Despite the relative novelty of the moniker, similar and related terms have been in use since the mid-1970s as a means of separating this music--a cleanly produced amalgam of R&B, funk, soul, and jazz--from the more high-brow jazz-rock efforts of groups like Weather Report, Return to Forever, Mahavishnu Orchestra, and Herbie Hancock's Head Hunters. In the popular press, terms such as crossover, pop-jazz, and jazz-lite stood against labels like jazz-rock, jazz-fusion, or just fusion as a means of separating the two subgenres as early as 1974. early 1990s radio-led efforts to label this music, coupled with Billboard's creation of its smooth and fusion-inspired Contemporary Jazz chart around the same time, represent the final step in smooth jazz's development as a commercially viable (if not artistically acceptable) jazz style. …" @default.
• W314962444 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W314962444 creator A5011269303 @default.
• W314962444 date "2008-03-22" @default.
• W314962444 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W314962444 title "Bridging the Gap: Creed Taylor, Grover Washington Jr., and the Crossover Roots of Smooth Jazz" @default.
• W314962444 cites W1482927345 @default.
• W314962444 cites W1516242894 @default.
• W314962444 cites W1994017118 @default.
• W314962444 cites W2004275431 @default.
• W314962444 cites W2076001403 @default.
• W314962444 cites W2076055930 @default.
• W314962444 cites W2088972915 @default.
• W314962444 cites W2139094516 @default.
• W314962444 cites W2345689609 @default.
• W314962444 cites W245830902 @default.
• W314962444 cites W577704147 @default.
• W314962444 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W314962444 type Work @default.
• W314962444 sameAs 314962444 @default.
• W314962444 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W314962444 countsByYear W3149624442017 @default.
• W314962444 countsByYear W3149624442019 @default.
• W314962444 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W314962444 hasAuthorship W314962444A5011269303 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C114611597 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C147446459 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C2980749 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C503380767 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C526099995 @default.
• W314962444 hasConcept C558565934 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C107038049 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C114611597 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C124952713 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C142362112 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C147446459 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C153349607 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C17744445 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C199539241 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C2777617010 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C2980749 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C503380767 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C526099995 @default.
• W314962444 hasConceptScore W314962444C558565934 @default.
• W314962444 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W314962444 hasLocation W3149624441 @default.
• W314962444 hasOpenAccess W314962444 @default.
• W314962444 hasPrimaryLocation W3149624441 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W1503628224 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W1543019077 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W1745618737 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W1804060858 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W1996174723 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2011074109 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2028711981 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2031850498 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2063757479 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2078921909 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2119101280 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2172441476 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2273171431 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2290462562 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2317954652 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2325521606 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2461668944 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2475765438 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2602986362 @default.
• W314962444 hasRelatedWork W2735605618 @default.
• W314962444 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W314962444 isParatext "false" @default.
• W314962444 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W314962444 magId "314962444" @default.
• W314962444 workType "article" @default.