FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3149869180> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3149869180 endingPage "768" @default.
• W3149869180 startingPage "762" @default.
• W3149869180 abstract "Aims To compare the functionality of adults with displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures treated either operatively or nonoperatively and to compare the relative risk of nonunion and reoperation between the two groups. Methods Based on specific eligibility criteria, 120 adults (median age 37.5 years (interquartile range (18 to 61)) and 84% males (n = 101)) diagnosed with an acute displaced mid-shaft fracture were recruited, and randomized to either the operative (n = 60) or nonoperative (n = 60) treatment group. This randomized controlled, partially blinded trial followed patients for 12 months following initial treatment. Functionality was assessed by the Constant score (CS) (assessor blinded to treatment) and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Clinical and radiological evaluation, and review of patient files for complications and reoperations, were added as secondary outcomes. Results At 12 months, 87.5% of patients (n = 105) were available for analysis. The two groups were well balanced based on demographic and fracture-related characteristics. At six weeks of follow-up a significant difference in DASH score (p < 0.001) was found in favour of operative treatment. The functionality at 12 months of follow-up based on CS and DASH was excellent in both groups (CS > 90 points and DASH < 10 points) with no significant difference (p = 0.277 for DASH and p = 0.184 for CS) between the two groups. The risk of symptomatic nonunion was significantly higher in the nonoperative group (p = 0.014), with a relative risk of 9.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 71.53) in this group compared to the operative group. The number-needed-to-treat to avoid one symptomatic nonunion was 6.2. Initial treatment and age were factors significantly associated with nonunion in a logistic analysis. There were 26% in both groups (n = 14 in operative group and n = 15 in nonoperative group) who required secondary surgery, with most indications in the nonoperative group mandatory due to nonunion compared to most relative indications in the operative group requiring intervention due to implant irritation. Conclusion Superiority was not identified with either an all-operative or all-nonoperative approach. The functionality at short term (within six weeks) seems igreater following operative treatment but was not found at one year. The risk of nonunion is significantly higher with nonoperative treatment. However, an all-operative approach to lower the nonunion risk may result in unnecessary surgery and is not recommended. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):762–768." @default.
• W3149869180 created "2021-04-13" @default.
• W3149869180 creator A5003225656 @default.
• W3149869180 creator A5015981651 @default.
• W3149869180 creator A5043699455 @default.
• W3149869180 creator A5045194046 @default.
• W3149869180 creator A5049161745 @default.
• W3149869180 creator A5060715363 @default.
• W3149869180 date "2021-04-01" @default.
• W3149869180 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3149869180 title "Neither operative nor nonoperative approach is superior for treating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a partially blinded randomized controlled clinical trial" @default.
• W3149869180 cites W1492693040 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W1963710671 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W1974884549 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2053371116 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2071705088 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2082325024 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2097104301 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2137536074 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2159621495 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2230309678 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2257684775 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2272359674 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2340930745 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2574509339 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2588888169 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2736479906 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2746174316 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2803075130 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2897889928 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2965372147 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W2985702867 @default.
• W3149869180 cites W4247903468 @default.
• W3149869180 doi "https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.103b4.bjj-2020-1636.r1" @default.
• W3149869180 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33789482" @default.
• W3149869180 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3149869180 type Work @default.
• W3149869180 sameAs 3149869180 @default.
• W3149869180 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W3149869180 countsByYear W31498691802021 @default.
• W3149869180 countsByYear W31498691802022 @default.
• W3149869180 countsByYear W31498691802023 @default.
• W3149869180 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3149869180 hasAuthorship W3149869180A5003225656 @default.
• W3149869180 hasAuthorship W3149869180A5015981651 @default.
• W3149869180 hasAuthorship W3149869180A5043699455 @default.
• W3149869180 hasAuthorship W3149869180A5045194046 @default.
• W3149869180 hasAuthorship W3149869180A5049161745 @default.
• W3149869180 hasAuthorship W3149869180A5060715363 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C119060515 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C2776090536 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C2779330695 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C2780193326 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C111919701 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C119060515 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C126322002 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C141071460 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C168563851 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C2776090536 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C2779330695 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C2780193326 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C41008148 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C44249647 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C71924100 @default.
• W3149869180 hasConceptScore W3149869180C82789193 @default.
• W3149869180 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3149869180 hasLocation W31498691801 @default.
• W3149869180 hasOpenAccess W3149869180 @default.
• W3149869180 hasPrimaryLocation W31498691801 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W1124411184 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W2058913076 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W2204322324 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W2289790300 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W2339427761 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W2746174316 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W2885024962 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W2897669216 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W2997430773 @default.
• W3149869180 hasRelatedWork W4207009038 @default.
• W3149869180 hasVolume "103-B" @default.
• W3149869180 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3149869180 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3149869180 magId "3149869180" @default.
• W3149869180 workType "article" @default.