Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3149910229> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3149910229 endingPage "111098" @default.
- W3149910229 startingPage "111098" @default.
- W3149910229 abstract "This study was carried out to determine the effect of arsenic on tomato and cabbage cultivated in sand, sandy silt, and silt soil, and irrigated with water containing arsenic at concentrations 0.05 and 0.2 mg/L. Increasing arsenic in irrigation water did not affect the photosynthetic machinery. The chlorophyll content index increased in case of all soils and was dependent on the soil nitrogen, phosphorous, and plant biomass. Arsenic concentrations of 0.05 and 0.2 mg/L did not display any phytotoxic symptoms other than reduction in biomass in some cases. In cabbage, arsenic treatment of 0.2 mg/L increased the overall plant biomass production, while in tomato there was a decrease in aerial part and fruit biomass. The biomass production of both plants treated with different concentrations of arsenic, in the three soils was in the following order: silt > sand > sandy silt. Increase of arsenic in the irrigation water resulted in increase in arsenic concentration in the root and aerial part of both plants, at the same cultivation parameters. But tomato fruits displayed a decrease in arsenic accumulation with higher arsenic treatment. In both plants, the arsenic concentration in the plant parts changed in the following order: root > aerial part > fruit. Cabbage accumulated approximately twenty-fold more arsenic in the edible part (0.10–0.25 mg/kg DW) as compared to tomato (0.006–0.011 mg/kg DW) and displayed a good correlation with soil extractable arsenic. When cabbage was cultivated in three different soils applying the same irrigation water, it accumulated arsenic in the following order: sand > sandy silt > silt (p < 0.001 at 0.05 mg/L and p < 0.01 at 0.2 mg/L arsenic treatment). In tomato, the difference in arsenic accumulation among different soil types was highly significant (p < 0.001) but the accumulation pattern varied with the arsenic treatment applied. Sandy soil with the lowest total soil arsenic (4.32 mg/kg) resulted in the highest arsenic concentration in both plants. Among all soils and plants, the transfer factors and bioaccumulation factors were higher in sandy soil, and in cabbage. The estimated daily intake and hazard quotient values for arsenic were lower than 1 in all cases, implying no non-cancerous health risks at the arsenic concentrations applied in our study. Among nutrients only P showed a slight decline with increasing arsenic concentration while all other elements (Mg, K, Ca, S, Si, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn) did not display any significant changes." @default.
- W3149910229 created "2021-04-13" @default.
- W3149910229 creator A5002593320 @default.
- W3149910229 creator A5005398133 @default.
- W3149910229 creator A5009467124 @default.
- W3149910229 creator A5038780488 @default.
- W3149910229 creator A5056309574 @default.
- W3149910229 creator A5069251238 @default.
- W3149910229 creator A5088144194 @default.
- W3149910229 creator A5090178824 @default.
- W3149910229 date "2021-06-01" @default.
- W3149910229 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
- W3149910229 title "Effect of arsenic-contaminated irrigation water on growth and elemental composition of tomato and cabbage cultivated in three different soils, and related health risk assessment" @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1791940915 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1965660757 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1967589131 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1968205998 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1973736153 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1976888987 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1977412442 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1978358339 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1982782183 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1984106810 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1984824871 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1990740606 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W1997632687 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2010285499 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2012508959 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2013298273 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2021086587 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2028961992 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2029862837 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2033459163 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2033895746 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2039086210 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2046474491 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2052523577 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2058304788 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2064609282 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2073698269 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2073731064 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2079352037 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2092126793 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2092973913 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2101507920 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2109172280 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2111701342 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2111882653 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2133258513 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2133480212 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2151335462 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2159267296 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2165096702 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2168249179 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2177442700 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2316076183 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2346941813 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2373011568 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2398919574 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2465442036 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2479064220 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2480831067 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2753834159 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2775675983 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2776094019 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2886716831 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2923411563 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2923514629 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2955378555 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2974964010 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2979950994 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2990718515 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W2998634410 @default.
- W3149910229 cites W897173655 @default.
- W3149910229 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111098" @default.
- W3149910229 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33826942" @default.
- W3149910229 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3149910229 type Work @default.
- W3149910229 sameAs 3149910229 @default.
- W3149910229 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W3149910229 countsByYear W31499102292022 @default.
- W3149910229 countsByYear W31499102292023 @default.
- W3149910229 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3149910229 hasAuthorship W3149910229A5002593320 @default.
- W3149910229 hasAuthorship W3149910229A5005398133 @default.
- W3149910229 hasAuthorship W3149910229A5009467124 @default.
- W3149910229 hasAuthorship W3149910229A5038780488 @default.
- W3149910229 hasAuthorship W3149910229A5056309574 @default.
- W3149910229 hasAuthorship W3149910229A5069251238 @default.
- W3149910229 hasAuthorship W3149910229A5088144194 @default.
- W3149910229 hasAuthorship W3149910229A5090178824 @default.
- W3149910229 hasBestOaLocation W31499102291 @default.
- W3149910229 hasConcept C115540264 @default.
- W3149910229 hasConcept C132165134 @default.
- W3149910229 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
- W3149910229 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W3149910229 hasConcept C159390177 @default.
- W3149910229 hasConcept C159750122 @default.