FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3150118367> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3150118367 endingPage "261" @default.
• W3150118367 startingPage "256" @default.
• W3150118367 abstract "Amyloid PET noninvasively visualizes amyloid-β accumulation in the brain. Visual binary reading is the standard method for interpreting amyloid PET, whereas objective quantitative evaluation is required in research and clinical trials. Anatomic standardization is important for quantitative analysis, and various standard templates are used for this purpose. To address the large differences in radioactivity distribution between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative participants, an adaptive-template method has been proposed for the anatomic standardization of amyloid PET. In this study, we investigated the difference between the adaptive-template method and the single-template methods (use of a positive or a negative template) in amyloid PET quantitative evaluation, focusing on the accuracy in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: In total, 166 participants (58 healthy controls [HCs], 62 patients with mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and 46 patients with AD) who underwent 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PiB) PET through the Japanese Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study were examined. For the anatomic standardization of 11C-PiB PET images, we applied 3 methods: a positive-template-based method, a negative-template-based method, and an adaptive-template-based method. The positive template was created by averaging the PET images for 4 patients with AD and 7 patients with MCI. Conversely, the negative template was created by averaging the PET images for 8 HCs. In the adaptive-template-based method, either of the templates was used on the basis of the similarity (normalized cross-correlation [NCC]) between the individual standardized image and the corresponding template. An empiric PiB-prone region of interest was used to evaluate specific regions where amyloid-β accumulates. The reference region was the cerebellar cortex, and the evaluated regions were the posterior cingulate gyrus and precuneus and the frontal, lateral temporal, lateral parietal, and occipital lobes. The mean cortical SUV ratio (mcSUVR) was calculated for quantitative evaluation. Results: The NCCs of single-template-based methods (the positive template or negative template) showed a significant difference among the HC, MCI, and AD groups (P < 0.05), whereas the NCC of the adaptive-template-based method did not (P > 0.05). The mcSUVR exhibited significant differences among the HC, MCI, and AD groups with all methods (P < 0.05). The mcSUVR area under the curve by receiver operating characteristic analysis between the positive group (MCI and AD) and the HC group did not significantly differ among templates. With regard to diagnostic accuracy based on mcSUVR, the sensitivity of the negative-template-based and adaptive-template-based methods was superior to that of the positive-template-based method (P < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference in specificity between them. Conclusion: In quantitative evaluation of AD by amyloid PET, the adaptive-template-based anatomic standardization method had greater diagnostic accuracy than the single-template-based methods." @default.
• W3150118367 created "2021-04-13" @default.
• W3150118367 creator A5036121480 @default.
• W3150118367 creator A5052030198 @default.
• W3150118367 creator A5054247478 @default.
• W3150118367 creator A5061571508 @default.
• W3150118367 creator A5075883320 @default.
• W3150118367 date "2021-04-05" @default.
• W3150118367 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3150118367 title "Improved Accuracy of Amyloid PET Quantification with Adaptive Template–Based Anatomic Standardization" @default.
• W3150118367 cites W1992265439 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W1994605917 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W1998110780 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2005584197 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2009178052 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2027006914 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2044614452 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2075916384 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2087267591 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2167840686 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2171573441 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2472551679 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2560999412 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W2801435301 @default.
• W3150118367 cites W3035172025 @default.
• W3150118367 doi "https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.120.261701" @default.
• W3150118367 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33820861" @default.
• W3150118367 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3150118367 type Work @default.
• W3150118367 sameAs 3150118367 @default.
• W3150118367 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3150118367 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3150118367 hasAuthorship W3150118367A5036121480 @default.
• W3150118367 hasAuthorship W3150118367A5052030198 @default.
• W3150118367 hasAuthorship W3150118367A5054247478 @default.
• W3150118367 hasAuthorship W3150118367A5061571508 @default.
• W3150118367 hasAuthorship W3150118367A5075883320 @default.
• W3150118367 hasBestOaLocation W31501183671 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C188087704 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C2775842073 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C2777633098 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C2781073650 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C502032728 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C58693492 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConcept C82714645 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C111919701 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C142724271 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C15744967 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C169760540 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C188087704 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C199360897 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C2775842073 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C2777633098 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C2779134260 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C2781073650 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C2989005 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C41008148 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C502032728 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C58693492 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C71924100 @default.
• W3150118367 hasConceptScore W3150118367C82714645 @default.
• W3150118367 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3150118367 hasLocation W31501183671 @default.
• W3150118367 hasLocation W31501183672 @default.
• W3150118367 hasLocation W31501183673 @default.
• W3150118367 hasOpenAccess W3150118367 @default.
• W3150118367 hasPrimaryLocation W31501183671 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W1983936885 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W1989476860 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W2083316737 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W2124108154 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W2165947974 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W2186251212 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W2318587403 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W2405635923 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W2425660695 @default.
• W3150118367 hasRelatedWork W2528867556 @default.
• W3150118367 hasVolume "49" @default.
• W3150118367 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3150118367 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3150118367 magId "3150118367" @default.
• W3150118367 workType "article" @default.