FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3150251161> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3150251161 endingPage "e25787" @default.
• W3150251161 startingPage "e25787" @default.
• W3150251161 abstract "Background Even in the era of digital technology, several hospitals still rely on paper-based forms for data entry for patient admission, triage, drug prescriptions, and procedures. Paper-based forms can be quick and convenient to complete but often at the expense of data quality, completeness, sustainability, and automated data analytics. Digital forms can improve data quality by assisting the user when deciding on the appropriate response to certain data inputs (eg, classifying symptoms). Greater data quality via digital form completion not only helps with auditing, service improvement, and patient record keeping but also helps with novel data science and machine learning research. Although digital forms are becoming more prevalent in health care, there is a lack of empirical best practices and guidelines for their design. The study-based hospital had a definite plan to abolish the paper form; hence, it was not necessary to compare the digital forms with the paper form. Objective This study aims to assess the usability of three different interactive forms: a single-page digital form (in which all data input is required on one web page), a multipage digital form, and a conversational digital form (a chatbot). Methods The three digital forms were developed as candidates to replace the current paper-based form used to record patient referrals to an interventional cardiology department (Cath-Lab) at Altnagelvin Hospital. We recorded usability data in a counterbalanced usability test (60 usability tests: 20 subjects×3 form usability tests). The usability data included task completion times, System Usability Scale (SUS) scores, User Experience Questionnaire data, and data from a postexperiment questionnaire. Results We found that the single-page form outperformed the other two digital forms in almost all usability metrics. The mean SUS score for the single-page form was 76 (SD 15.8; P=.01) when compared with the multipage form, which had a mean score of 67 (SD 17), and the conversational form attained the lowest scores in usability testing and was the least preferred choice of users, with a mean score of 57 (SD 24). An SUS score of >68 was considered above average. The single-page form achieved the least task completion time compared with the other two digital form styles. Conclusions In conclusion, the digital single-page form outperformed the other two forms in almost all usability metrics; it had the least task completion time compared with those of the other two digital forms. Moreover, on answering the open-ended question from the final customized postexperiment questionnaire, the single-page form was the preferred choice." @default.
• W3150251161 created "2021-04-13" @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5010537224 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5045425207 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5047332043 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5047624828 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5055308927 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5066251995 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5066922218 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5067279312 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5072110026 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5073551828 @default.
• W3150251161 creator A5077771643 @default.
• W3150251161 date "2021-05-26" @default.
• W3150251161 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W3150251161 title "Comparing Single-Page, Multipage, and Conversational Digital Forms in Health Care: Usability Study" @default.
• W3150251161 cites W133823049 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W1861747734 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W1984253812 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2013687432 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2016157817 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2032191478 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2043774123 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2099117796 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2099386344 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2163672276 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2175992854 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2206382521 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2419901992 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2565206647 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2568709432 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2603809867 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2611556044 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2623779865 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2940530202 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2941148620 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2942503828 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W2948120986 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W3087596580 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W4239496300 @default.
• W3150251161 cites W95067517 @default.
• W3150251161 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/25787" @default.
• W3150251161 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8190652" @default.
• W3150251161 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34037531" @default.
• W3150251161 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3150251161 type Work @default.
• W3150251161 sameAs 3150251161 @default.
• W3150251161 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3150251161 countsByYear W31502511612022 @default.
• W3150251161 countsByYear W31502511612023 @default.
• W3150251161 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5010537224 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5045425207 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5047332043 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5047624828 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5055308927 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5066251995 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5066922218 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5067279312 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5072110026 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5073551828 @default.
• W3150251161 hasAuthorship W3150251161A5077771643 @default.
• W3150251161 hasBestOaLocation W31502511611 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C100302975 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C11324603 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C139225968 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C2779041454 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C2780433410 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C4237393 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C100302975 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C107457646 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C11324603 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C136764020 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C139225968 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C160735492 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C162324750 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C170130773 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C187736073 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C199521495 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C2779041454 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C2780433410 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C41008148 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C4237393 @default.
• W3150251161 hasConceptScore W3150251161C50522688 @default.
• W3150251161 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3150251161 hasLocation W31502511611 @default.
• W3150251161 hasLocation W31502511612 @default.
• W3150251161 hasLocation W31502511613 @default.
• W3150251161 hasLocation W31502511614 @default.

• next