Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3150602309> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W3150602309 abstract "The article is devoted to the disclosure of features of legal realism as a special direction of sociological jurisprudence. The historical prerequisites for the formation of American legal realism are considered. It was emphasized that legal realism emerged as a reaction to the formal principle of adjudication, which insisted on the need for strict adherence to case law. The leader of American legal formalism, K. Langdell, viewed law as a combination of legal concepts derived by inductively generalizing previous court decisions. It has been proven that one of the first to disagree with this approach was judges of U.S. Supreme Court Justice O. Holmes and B. Cardozo. A comparative analysis of the views of K. Llewellyn and J. Frank, who are recognized leaders of the movement of legal realism, was done. It was established that K. Llewellyn considered that law is not only the judge decide but also any other persons with powers over the disputes. He paid particular attention to the study of the activities of the High Courts and emphasized the need to use the so-called Grand-style in the judicial decision-making process, which allows the law to be adapted to the real circumstances of the case and to contemporary social change. In contrast, J. Frank insisted that the judge was the creator of the law, and that the courts of first instance played a major role in the administration of justice. In his opinion, one of the decisive factors in the administration of justice is the personality of the judge, his individual and psychological qualities. It has been found that despite the lack of unity of positions of the supporters of legal realism, they are united by the underestimation of positive law as a factor of certainty and stability of legal relations, an instrumental approach to law and excessive psychologization of the judicial process. It is concluded that despite the significant shortcomings inherent in legal realism, this line of legal thought has made a significant impact on the general theory and philosophy of law through the combination of methods of sociological and psychological study of legal reality and the disclosure of internal mechanisms of formation judicial decisions." @default.
- W3150602309 created "2021-04-13" @default.
- W3150602309 date "2020-01-01" @default.
- W3150602309 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W3150602309 title "LEGAL REALISM AS DIRECTION OF SOCIOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE" @default.
- W3150602309 doi "https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1834-2020-29-03" @default.
- W3150602309 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3150602309 type Work @default.
- W3150602309 sameAs 3150602309 @default.
- W3150602309 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3150602309 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3150602309 hasBestOaLocation W31506023091 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C100701532 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C131330614 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C135874517 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C149209484 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C1556254 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C162723807 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C167633797 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C170692843 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C204434341 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C30730545 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C47855350 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C522695570 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C543847140 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConcept C75011936 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C100701532 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C111472728 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C131330614 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C135874517 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C138885662 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C144024400 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C149209484 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C1556254 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C162723807 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C167633797 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C170692843 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C17744445 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C199539241 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C204434341 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C2778272461 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C30730545 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C47855350 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C522695570 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C543847140 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C71043370 @default.
- W3150602309 hasConceptScore W3150602309C75011936 @default.
- W3150602309 hasIssue "29" @default.
- W3150602309 hasLocation W31506023091 @default.
- W3150602309 hasOpenAccess W3150602309 @default.
- W3150602309 hasPrimaryLocation W31506023091 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W1582138860 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W2301492134 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W2365439053 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W2390434099 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W2952887355 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W3122720278 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W3150602309 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W3177536744 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W3214841647 @default.
- W3150602309 hasRelatedWork W2131245083 @default.
- W3150602309 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3150602309 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3150602309 magId "3150602309" @default.
- W3150602309 workType "article" @default.