FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W315205763> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W315205763 startingPage "223" @default.
• W315205763 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION The 2004 reauthorization1 of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) legislation left unchanged brief provision according parents right to obtain independent educational (IEE) as one of their notable2 procedural safeguards without further specifications such as a definition or standards.3 The 2006 IDEA regulations4 repeated various specifications of 1999 version with only one change - limiting parents to only one IEE at each time school district conducts evaluation with which a parent disagreed.5 In addition to defining IEE as an evaluation conducted by a qualified examiner who is not employed by [district],6 regulations contain following pertinent provision regarding IEEs at no cost to parent: (1) A parent has right to [TEE] at if parent disagrees with evaluation obtained by agency, subject to [following] conditions. (2) If a parent requests [G??] at expense, must, without unnecessary delay, either (i) File a due process complaint to request a hearing to show that its evaluation is appropriate; or (ii) Ensure that [TEE] is provided at expense, unless demonstrates in [an impartial hearing under IDEA] . . . that evaluation obtained by parent did not meet criteria.7 Regarding agency for IEEs at expense, regulations provide that the criteria under which evaluation is obtained, including location of evaluation and qualifications of examiner, must be same as criteria that [district]8 uses when it initiates evaluation, to extent those criteria are consistent with parent's right to [IEE].9 This regulatory language effectively forms following framework of procedural then substantive standards for LEEs at expense,10 akin to provisions for tuition reimbursement:11 (1) parent must disagree; (2) district must file without unnecessary delay; (3) district must show its evaluation is appropriate; and (4) district must show that LEE is not appropriate. The purpose of this Artide is to synthesize legal boundaries concerning these four standards for LEEs at expense.12 The source material consists primarily of court decisions available via Lexis and Westlaw databases and via LDELR13 with U.S. Department of Education (USDE) policy interpretations serving as a secondary supplement.14 However, given this ample higher authority, scope does not include hearing or review officer decisions under LDEA: because legal literature lacks such a synthesis, and because most hearing or review officers' decisions concerning LEEs do not cite these primary sources, hearing and review officers are among groups that will benefit from this article.15 Further, coverage does not extend to technical matters related to IEEs at expense,16 such as standing to pursue reimbursement for IEE17 or to IEE reimbursement under other provisions in IDEA18 or under other laws, such as Section 50419 and state laws for gifted students.20 Finally, scope does not include related question of meaning of public expense regarding parents' insurance.21 Some of case law did not carefully adhere to pertinent regulation, providing summary and suspect rationales. For example, in a 1997 decision, a federal district court in Pennsylvania denied IEE reimbursement based on purportedly well-settled [proposition] that reimbursement is only appropriate where evaluations result in a change in IEP22 Thus, courts too will benefit from a comprehensive and current canvassing of judicial and USDE interpretations concerning IEEs. II. PARENT DISAGREEMENT The federal appellate courts have moderated role of this procedural standard rather than interpreting notification of parental disagreement as absolute prerequisite for IEE reimbursement. …" @default.
• W315205763 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W315205763 creator A5061025573 @default.
• W315205763 date "2009-04-01" @default.
• W315205763 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W315205763 title "Independent Educational Evaluations at District Expense under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act" @default.
• W315205763 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W315205763 type Work @default.
• W315205763 sameAs 315205763 @default.
• W315205763 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W315205763 countsByYear W3152057632013 @default.
• W315205763 countsByYear W3152057632014 @default.
• W315205763 countsByYear W3152057632019 @default.
• W315205763 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W315205763 hasAuthorship W315205763A5061025573 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C188198153 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C2779614053 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C2780838233 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C28858896 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W315205763 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C108170787 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C127413603 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C144024400 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C144133560 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C15744967 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C161191863 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C162118730 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C17744445 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C188198153 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C199539241 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C2777351106 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C2777855551 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C2779614053 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C2780838233 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C28858896 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C36289849 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C41008148 @default.
• W315205763 hasConceptScore W315205763C78519656 @default.
• W315205763 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W315205763 hasLocation W3152057631 @default.
• W315205763 hasOpenAccess W315205763 @default.
• W315205763 hasPrimaryLocation W3152057631 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W123225892 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W138785983 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W1566522611 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W1595582457 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W1995508527 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W2171902179 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W2224310428 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W2264293003 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W238789508 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W2595090791 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W2897713474 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W2900752410 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W2978598719 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W301360396 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W3125229705 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W338289650 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W57178519 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W605454580 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W933687992 @default.
• W315205763 hasRelatedWork W200071616 @default.
• W315205763 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W315205763 isParatext "false" @default.
• W315205763 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W315205763 magId "315205763" @default.
• W315205763 workType "article" @default.