FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3152747089> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3152747089 endingPage "e24766" @default.
• W3152747089 startingPage "e24766" @default.
• W3152747089 abstract "Background Digital imaging of dermatological patients is a novel approach to remote assessment and has recently become more relevant since telehealth and remote decentralized clinical trials are gaining ground. Objective We aimed to investigate whether photographs taken by a smartphone are of adequate quality to allow severity assessments to be made and to explore the usefulness of an established atopic dermatitis severity assessment instrument on photograph evaluation. Methods During scheduled visits in a previously published study, the investigating doctor evaluated the severity of atopic dermatitis using the Scoring AD (SCORAD) index and took photographs of the most representative lesions (target lesions) with both a smartphone and a digital single-lens reflex camera (DSLR). The photographs were then assessed by 5 dermatologists using the intensity items of the SCORAD (iSCORAD), which consists of erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts, and dryness (scale 0-3, maximum score 18). The mean iSCORAD of the photographs was calculated and compared with in-person assessments using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used for interrater reliability. Results A total of 942 photographs from 95 patients were assessed. The iSCORAD based on smartphone photographs correlated strongly with the evaluations performed in person (iSCORAD: r=0.78, P<.001; objective SCORAD: r=0.81, P<.001; and total SCORAD: r=0.78, P<.001). For iSCORAD specifically, a Bland-Altman plot showed a difference in mean score of 1.31 for in-person and remote iSCORAD. In addition, the interrater agreement between the 5 rating dermatologists was 0.93 (95% CI 0.911-0.939). A total of 170 lesions were photographed, and the difference in mean scores was 1.32, 1.13, and 1.43 between in-person and remote evaluations based on photographs taken by a DSLR camera, a smartphone without flash, and a smartphone with flash, respectively. Conclusions In terms of quality, remote atopic dermatitis severity assessments based on photographs are comparable to in-person assessments, and smartphone photos can be used to assess atopic dermatitis severity to a similar degree as photographs from a DSLR camera. Further, the variation in how the dermatologists in this study rated the iSCORAD based on the photographs was very low." @default.
• W3152747089 created "2021-04-26" @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5008563717 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5010642321 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5016819356 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5020382226 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5021511466 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5022792929 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5040479360 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5041067061 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5041212876 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5046502459 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5052258367 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5058835576 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5070320388 @default.
• W3152747089 creator A5076432153 @default.
• W3152747089 date "2021-05-25" @default.
• W3152747089 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W3152747089 title "Remote Rating of Atopic Dermatitis Severity Using Photo-Based Assessments: Proof-of-Concept and Reliability Evaluation" @default.
• W3152747089 cites W1830784243 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W1878704468 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W1994603799 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2019286335 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2026544398 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2109234023 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2327037637 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2520780249 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2593244680 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2601554386 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2613753055 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2626559756 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2885447570 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2895265283 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2901927288 @default.
• W3152747089 cites W2911281995 @default.
• W3152747089 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/24766" @default.
• W3152747089 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8188317" @default.
• W3152747089 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34032580" @default.
• W3152747089 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3152747089 type Work @default.
• W3152747089 sameAs 3152747089 @default.
• W3152747089 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W3152747089 countsByYear W31527470892022 @default.
• W3152747089 countsByYear W31527470892023 @default.
• W3152747089 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5008563717 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5010642321 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5016819356 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5020382226 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5021511466 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5022792929 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5040479360 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5041067061 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5041212876 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5046502459 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5052258367 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5058835576 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5070320388 @default.
• W3152747089 hasAuthorship W3152747089A5076432153 @default.
• W3152747089 hasBestOaLocation W31527470891 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C2776173921 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C2778329239 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C2779121184 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C2780501606 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C2780564577 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C104709138 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C105795698 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C121332964 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C16005928 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C163258240 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C171606756 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C1862650 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C2776173921 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C2778329239 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C2779121184 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C2780501606 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C2780564577 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C33923547 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C43214815 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C61863361 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C62520636 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C70410870 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C71924100 @default.
• W3152747089 hasConceptScore W3152747089C83849319 @default.

• next