FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3154164369> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3154164369 endingPage "454" @default.
• W3154164369 startingPage "453" @default.
• W3154164369 abstract "Online databases have provided considerable advantages to many fields of investigation, including plant taxonomy. Despite the positive impacts of digital resources for taxonomists, especially in providing ease of access to information regarding literature and (potential) type specimens, there can be surprising negative consequences. In recent years there has been a very significant increase in the number of papers that include typifications based on inspection of digital images of original material rather than the actual specimens. There is a common curatorial issue associated with undertaking typifications, especially those based on web-sourced, digital images. This problem is not caused by web access per se, but it is certainly exacerbated by it. In our experience, authors infrequently notify herbaria that one or more of their specimens has been selected or nominated as a particular type, lectotype being a common example. Authors infrequently send their publications (and/or appropriately annotated determinavit/confirmavit slips) to affected herbaria. Therefore, these institutions are very often unaware that changes have occurred that affect their holdings, and the appropriate specimen curation is not done. A possible (but seemingly not common) consequence of this is that it could lead to an inadvertent retypification of the typified name. We are aware of very many examples from a range of journals where herbarium specimens have not been annotated as to their type status following publication of the article. It is relevant to remember here that the purpose of typification is (hopefully) to bring more precision and stability to names involved. Therefore, in our view, these goals would be best served if specimens newly designated as types were appropriately annotated as an integral part of the typification process. In view of the above, we feel that a new Recommendation in the Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018) is warranted. “9C.2. In the case that a choice of holotype, lectotype, neotype, or epitype is based on web-sourced, digital images of specimens, the author(s) designating the type should notify the curator of the herbarium, collection, or institution to update the labelling of the specimen and thereby reduce the chances of further nomenclatural amendments or inadvertent retypification.” We thank Dr. Bruce Maslin (PERTH) and Nicholas Turland (B) for their insightful comments and suggestions. We are also grateful to Mr. Vijay Crishna, Director NGCPR, for his consistent research support." @default.
• W3154164369 created "2021-04-26" @default.
• W3154164369 creator A5035361422 @default.
• W3154164369 creator A5049946721 @default.
• W3154164369 date "2021-04-01" @default.
• W3154164369 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3154164369 title "(071) Proposal for accountability in designating types based on virtually seen original material" @default.
• W3154164369 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12470" @default.
• W3154164369 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3154164369 type Work @default.
• W3154164369 sameAs 3154164369 @default.
• W3154164369 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3154164369 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3154164369 hasAuthorship W3154164369A5035361422 @default.
• W3154164369 hasAuthorship W3154164369A5049946721 @default.
• W3154164369 hasBestOaLocation W31541643691 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C2779782522 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C514705636 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C58642233 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C78945076 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C136764020 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C18903297 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C205649164 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C23123220 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C2522767166 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C2779782522 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C41008148 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C514705636 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C58642233 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C78945076 @default.
• W3154164369 hasConceptScore W3154164369C86803240 @default.
• W3154164369 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3154164369 hasLocation W31541643691 @default.
• W3154164369 hasOpenAccess W3154164369 @default.
• W3154164369 hasPrimaryLocation W31541643691 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W2146644590 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W2324500697 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W2794244735 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W3115195762 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W3161566296 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W4297184492 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W4327905224 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W4367180602 @default.
• W3154164369 hasRelatedWork W4385641912 @default.
• W3154164369 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W3154164369 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3154164369 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3154164369 magId "3154164369" @default.
• W3154164369 workType "article" @default.