FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3154391566> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3154391566 endingPage "1029" @default.
• W3154391566 startingPage "1025" @default.
• W3154391566 abstract "BACKGROUND The primary goal of endodontic retreatment is to take out the root filling completely to ensure that the canal is completely cleaned. Gutta percha removal using hand instruments is a time-consuming procedure and tedious for the operator. Therefore, various nickel titanium instruments have been introduced for the effective retrieval of gutta percha. This study was done to compare the efficacy of three different rotary systems compared with manual instrumentation for gutta percha removal during retreatment. METHODS Forty-eight single rooted premolars were prepared and obturated using gutta percha and AH Plus sealer using lateral compaction technique. Samples were randomly divided into four groups of 12 specimens each. Group 1 was retreated with Hedstrom Files (H-Files), group 2 was retreated with pro taper universal retreatment files (PTUR), group 3 with R-Endo retreatment files and group 4 with Neoendo retreatment files. Time taken for the retreatment was recorded for each tooth using a stopwatch. The samples were sectioned longitudinally and observed under a stereomicroscope. Digital images were taken and analysed using digital image analysing software. The data was statistically analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and Post-hoc Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS The Neoendo group showed significantly lower amount of residual material compared to PTUR, R-Endo and the H-Files (P = 0.00). The maximum residual material was observed in the H file group. The time taken for gutta percha removal was least for the Neoendo group followed by PTUR, R-Endo and H-Files. CONCLUSIONS None of the instruments were able to remove the filling material completely. Gutta percha removal using Neoendo and protaper universal retreatment files were faster and more efficient compared to REndo and H files. KEY WORDS Endodontic Retreatment, Protaper Universal Retreatment Files, R-Endo, Neoendo, HFiles" @default.
• W3154391566 created "2021-04-26" @default.
• W3154391566 creator A5036992280 @default.
• W3154391566 creator A5053667889 @default.
• W3154391566 creator A5066329602 @default.
• W3154391566 creator A5076816637 @default.
• W3154391566 creator A5090697935 @default.
• W3154391566 date "2021-04-05" @default.
• W3154391566 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3154391566 title "Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Rotary Retreatment Systems with Manual Instrumentation in Removing Gutta-Percha from Root Canals – An In Vitro Study" @default.
• W3154391566 cites W1968789180 @default.
• W3154391566 cites W2473795928 @default.
• W3154391566 cites W2732135185 @default.
• W3154391566 cites W2767928044 @default.
• W3154391566 cites W2776803321 @default.
• W3154391566 cites W2926109606 @default.
• W3154391566 cites W2952115374 @default.
• W3154391566 doi "https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2021/219" @default.
• W3154391566 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3154391566 type Work @default.
• W3154391566 sameAs 3154391566 @default.
• W3154391566 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3154391566 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3154391566 hasAuthorship W3154391566A5036992280 @default.
• W3154391566 hasAuthorship W3154391566A5053667889 @default.
• W3154391566 hasAuthorship W3154391566A5066329602 @default.
• W3154391566 hasAuthorship W3154391566A5076816637 @default.
• W3154391566 hasAuthorship W3154391566A5090697935 @default.
• W3154391566 hasBestOaLocation W31543915661 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConcept C2778708630 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConcept C2779245719 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConcept C2779747767 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConcept C2992886853 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConceptScore W3154391566C199343813 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConceptScore W3154391566C2778708630 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConceptScore W3154391566C2779245719 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConceptScore W3154391566C2779747767 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConceptScore W3154391566C29694066 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConceptScore W3154391566C2992886853 @default.
• W3154391566 hasConceptScore W3154391566C71924100 @default.
• W3154391566 hasIssue "14" @default.
• W3154391566 hasLocation W31543915661 @default.
• W3154391566 hasOpenAccess W3154391566 @default.
• W3154391566 hasPrimaryLocation W31543915661 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W2669431331 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W2776803321 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W2993524869 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W2999462448 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W3196350037 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W4243769319 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W4280539176 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W4285161229 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W4290805223 @default.
• W3154391566 hasRelatedWork W4312836331 @default.
• W3154391566 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W3154391566 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3154391566 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3154391566 magId "3154391566" @default.
• W3154391566 workType "article" @default.