FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3155778828> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3155778828 abstract "Abstract Background The application of side-to-end anastomosis (SEA) in sphincter-preserving resection (SPR) is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of SEA with colonic J-pouch (CJP) anastomosis, which had been proven effective in improving postoperative bowel function. Methods The protocol was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42020206764. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the safety or efficacy of SEA in comparison with CJP anastomosis. The outcomes included the pooled risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous variables and weighted mean differences (WMDs) for continuous variables. All outcomes were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) by STATA software (Stata 14, Stata Corporation, TX, USA). Results A total of 864 patients from 10 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Patients undergoing SEA had a higher defecation frequency at 12 months after SPR (WMD = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.14–0.26; P < 0.01) than those undergoing CJP anastomosis with low heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%, P = 0.54) and a lower incidence of incomplete defecation at 3 months after surgery (RR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09–0.86; P = 0.03). A shorter operating time (WMD = − 17.65; 95% CI, − 23.28 to − 12.02; P < 0.01) was also observed in the SEA group without significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%, P = 0.54). A higher anorectal resting pressure (WMD = 6.25; 95% CI, 0.17–12.32; P = 0.04) was found in the SEA group but the heterogeneity was high ( I 2 = 84.5%, P = 0.84). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of efficacy outcomes including defecation frequency, the incidence of urgency, incomplete defecation, the use of pads, enema, medications, anorectal squeeze pressure and maximum rectal volume, or safety outcomes including operating time, blood loss, the use of protective stoma, postoperative complications, clinical outcomes, and oncological outcomes. Conclusions The present evidence suggests that SEA is an effective anastomotic strategy to achieve similar postoperative bowel function without increasing the risk of complications compared with CJP anastomosis. The advantages of SEA include a shorter operating time, a lower incidence of incomplete defecation at 3 months after surgery, and better sphincter function. However, close attention should be paid to the long-term defecation frequency after SPR." @default.
• W3155778828 created "2021-04-26" @default.
• W3155778828 creator A5025593335 @default.
• W3155778828 creator A5033073898 @default.
• W3155778828 creator A5063131315 @default.
• W3155778828 creator A5068851817 @default.
• W3155778828 creator A5071078080 @default.
• W3155778828 creator A5075654747 @default.
• W3155778828 date "2021-04-21" @default.
• W3155778828 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W3155778828 title "Safety and efficacy of side-to-end anastomosis versus colonic J-pouch anastomosis in sphincter-preserving resections: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" @default.
• W3155778828 cites W1905389134 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W1918112532 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W1970158734 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W1986215651 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W1986959072 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W1990426974 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W1996297937 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W1999941461 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2000844889 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2012578498 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2022288200 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2023947142 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2026669489 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2039418122 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2044827688 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2052977547 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2058211399 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2059536028 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2059734182 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2066248963 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2071936561 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2073157538 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2084067216 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2086911212 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2094106712 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2094465379 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2096371238 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2134833483 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2161374186 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2168374128 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2170892587 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2755194829 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2782574851 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2793769541 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2835013578 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2893171853 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2925740051 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2935985804 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W2991126840 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W3035780630 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W3044160571 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W3047060989 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W3081366582 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W3085971320 @default.
• W3155778828 cites W4235101923 @default.
• W3155778828 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02243-0" @default.
• W3155778828 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8061176" @default.
• W3155778828 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33882952" @default.
• W3155778828 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3155778828 type Work @default.
• W3155778828 sameAs 3155778828 @default.
• W3155778828 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W3155778828 countsByYear W31557788282021 @default.
• W3155778828 countsByYear W31557788282022 @default.
• W3155778828 countsByYear W31557788282023 @default.
• W3155778828 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3155778828 hasAuthorship W3155778828A5025593335 @default.
• W3155778828 hasAuthorship W3155778828A5033073898 @default.
• W3155778828 hasAuthorship W3155778828A5063131315 @default.
• W3155778828 hasAuthorship W3155778828A5068851817 @default.
• W3155778828 hasAuthorship W3155778828A5071078080 @default.
• W3155778828 hasAuthorship W3155778828A5075654747 @default.
• W3155778828 hasBestOaLocation W31557788281 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C108797546 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C2777596629 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C108797546 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C126322002 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C141071460 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C142724271 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C168563851 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C204787440 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C2777596629 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C44249647 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C71924100 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C82789193 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C8443397 @default.
• W3155778828 hasConceptScore W3155778828C95190672 @default.

• next