FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3156176985> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3156176985 endingPage "e26666" @default.
• W3156176985 startingPage "e26666" @default.
• W3156176985 abstract "Background There are many alternatives to direct journal access, such as podcasts, blogs, and news sites, that allow physicians and the general public to stay up to date with medical literature. However, there is a scarcity of literature that investigates the readership characteristics of open-access medical news sites and how these characteristics may have shifted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective This study aimed to assess readership and survey data to characterize open-access medical news readership trends related to the COVID-19 pandemic and overall readership trends regarding pandemic-related information delivery. Methods Anonymous, aggregate readership data were obtained from 2 Minute Medicine, an open-access, physician-run medical news organization that has published over 8000 original, physician-written texts and visual summaries of new medical research since 2013. In this retrospective observational study, the average number of article views, number of actions (defined as the sum of the number of views, shares, and outbound link clicks), read times, and bounce rates (probability of leaving a page in <30 s) were compared between COVID-19 articles published from January 1 to May 31, 2020 (n=40) and non–COVID-19 articles (n=145) published in the same time period. A voluntary survey was also sent to subscribed 2 Minute Medicine readers to further characterize readership demographics and preferences, which were scored on a Likert scale. Results COVID-19 articles had a significantly higher median number of views than non–COVID-19 articles (296 vs 110; U=748.5; P<.001). There were no significant differences in average read times (P=.12) or bounce rates (P=.12). Non–COVID-19 articles had a higher median number of actions than COVID-19 articles (2.9 vs 2.5; U=2070.5; P=.02). On a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), our survey data revealed that 65.5% (78/119) of readers agreed or strongly agreed that they preferred staying up to date with emerging literature about COVID-19 by using sources such as 2 Minute Medicine instead of journals. A greater proportion of survey respondents also indicated that open-access news sources were one of their primary sources for staying informed (86/120, 71.7%) compared to the proportion who preferred direct journal article access (61/120, 50.8%). The proportion of readers indicating they were reading one or less full-length medical studies a month were lower following introduction to 2 Minute Medicine compared to prior (21/120, 17.5% vs 38/120, 31.6%; P=.005). Conclusions The readership significantly increased for one open-access medical literature platform during the pandemic. This reinforces the idea that open-access, physician-written sources of medical news represent an important alternative to direct journal access for readers who want to stay up to date with medical literature." @default.
• W3156176985 created "2021-04-26" @default.
• W3156176985 creator A5005282497 @default.
• W3156176985 creator A5017259610 @default.
• W3156176985 creator A5049780493 @default.
• W3156176985 creator A5065678103 @default.
• W3156176985 date "2021-05-25" @default.
• W3156176985 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3156176985 title "Characterization of an Open-Access Medical News Platform’s Readership During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study" @default.
• W3156176985 cites W1994426721 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W1996091676 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W2113601548 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W2416609019 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W2479527281 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W2889016891 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W2974087526 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W3011186656 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W3017257354 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W3021141494 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W3033808757 @default.
• W3156176985 cites W4239953570 @default.
• W3156176985 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/26666" @default.
• W3156176985 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8153036" @default.
• W3156176985 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33866307" @default.
• W3156176985 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3156176985 type Work @default.
• W3156176985 sameAs 3156176985 @default.
• W3156176985 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3156176985 countsByYear W31561769852022 @default.
• W3156176985 countsByYear W31561769852023 @default.
• W3156176985 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3156176985 hasAuthorship W3156176985A5005282497 @default.
• W3156176985 hasAuthorship W3156176985A5017259610 @default.
• W3156176985 hasAuthorship W3156176985A5049780493 @default.
• W3156176985 hasAuthorship W3156176985A5065678103 @default.
• W3156176985 hasBestOaLocation W31561769851 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C82307848 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConcept C89623803 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C112698675 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C142724271 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C144133560 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C15744967 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C23131810 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C2779134260 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C3008058167 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C512399662 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C524204448 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C71924100 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C82307848 @default.
• W3156176985 hasConceptScore W3156176985C89623803 @default.
• W3156176985 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3156176985 hasLocation W31561769851 @default.
• W3156176985 hasLocation W31561769852 @default.
• W3156176985 hasLocation W31561769853 @default.
• W3156176985 hasLocation W31561769854 @default.
• W3156176985 hasOpenAccess W3156176985 @default.
• W3156176985 hasPrimaryLocation W31561769851 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W3103289217 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W3106370311 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W3119540162 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W3152606407 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W3152916563 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W4313474620 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W4327956415 @default.
• W3156176985 hasRelatedWork W4381942459 @default.
• W3156176985 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W3156176985 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3156176985 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3156176985 magId "3156176985" @default.
• W3156176985 workType "article" @default.