Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3156197103> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3156197103 endingPage "e18502" @default.
- W3156197103 startingPage "e18502" @default.
- W3156197103 abstract "Background Oncology has been facing increasing outpatient activity associated with higher cancer incidence, better survival rates, and more treatment options. Innovative technological solutions could help deal with this increasing demand. Using digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to identify patients who need a face-to-face (FTF) appointment is a potential approach. Objective This study aims to assess the feasibility of digital PROM questionnaires to enable remote symptom monitoring for patients undergoing cancer treatment and their ability to highlight the requirement for an FTF appointment. Methods This study was performed at a tertiary oncology center between December 2018 and February 2019. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were adapted into patient-friendly language to form the basis of treatment-specific digital questionnaires covering specific cancer drugs and radiotherapy treatments. These treatment-specific digital PROM questionnaires were scored by both patients and their clinicians during FTF appointments. Patients and clinicians did not see each other’s scored PROMs. Agreement between patients and clinicians was assessed using descriptive statistics. Patient and staff feedback was also obtained. Results In total, 90 patients participated in the study across 10 different treatment pathways. By comparing paired patient and clinician responses, the sensitivity of the patient-completed questionnaires in correctly highlighting the need for FTF review was 94% (44/47), and all patients with severe or grade 3+ symptoms were identified (6/6, 100%). Patient-completed PROMs appropriately revealed that 29% (26/90) of the participating patients did not need FTF review based on their symptoms alone. Certain oncological treatment pathways, such as immunotherapy, were found to have a larger proportion of patients with minimal symptoms than others, such as conventional chemotherapy. Patient and staff feedback showed high approval of digital PROMs and their potential for use in remote monitoring. Conclusions Digital PROM questionnaires can feasibly highlight the need for FTF review in oncology clinics for treatment. Their use with specific treatments could safely reduce the requirement for FTF care, and future work should evaluate their application in the remote monitoring of patients." @default.
- W3156197103 created "2021-04-26" @default.
- W3156197103 creator A5006634339 @default.
- W3156197103 creator A5014300583 @default.
- W3156197103 creator A5034374069 @default.
- W3156197103 creator A5071723591 @default.
- W3156197103 date "2021-08-13" @default.
- W3156197103 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3156197103 title "Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Monitoring of Patients on Cancer Treatment: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study" @default.
- W3156197103 cites W1920817354 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W1985554918 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2086813587 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2109330988 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2118638289 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2135001286 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2148011420 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2156921701 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2195040438 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2323753573 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2518165865 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2604093837 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2612911641 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2747585789 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2941815390 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2954878153 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2961037218 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W2975827419 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W3080997487 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W3088162178 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W3093826090 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W3095896260 @default.
- W3156197103 cites W3118788544 @default.
- W3156197103 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/18502" @default.
- W3156197103 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8398740" @default.
- W3156197103 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34398785" @default.
- W3156197103 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3156197103 type Work @default.
- W3156197103 sameAs 3156197103 @default.
- W3156197103 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W3156197103 countsByYear W31561971032022 @default.
- W3156197103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3156197103 hasAuthorship W3156197103A5006634339 @default.
- W3156197103 hasAuthorship W3156197103A5014300583 @default.
- W3156197103 hasAuthorship W3156197103A5034374069 @default.
- W3156197103 hasAuthorship W3156197103A5071723591 @default.
- W3156197103 hasBestOaLocation W31561971031 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C2777364248 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C2777793932 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C2779517570 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C3019816032 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C121608353 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C126322002 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C131872663 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C141071460 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C142052008 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C142724271 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C159110408 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C1862650 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C197934379 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C2775944032 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C2777364248 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C2777793932 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C2779517570 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C2779951463 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C3019816032 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C512399662 @default.
- W3156197103 hasConceptScore W3156197103C71924100 @default.
- W3156197103 hasIssue "8" @default.
- W3156197103 hasLocation W31561971031 @default.
- W3156197103 hasLocation W31561971032 @default.
- W3156197103 hasOpenAccess W3156197103 @default.
- W3156197103 hasPrimaryLocation W31561971031 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W1930224867 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W2337619992 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W2772149402 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W2888505858 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W2946140704 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W3120814857 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W3156197103 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W3211067859 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W4247838577 @default.
- W3156197103 hasRelatedWork W4283371401 @default.
- W3156197103 hasVolume "5" @default.
- W3156197103 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3156197103 isRetracted "false" @default.