FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3156763485> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3156763485 endingPage "199" @default.
• W3156763485 startingPage "190" @default.
• W3156763485 abstract "To compare hand-held breast ultrasound (HHBUS) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) as screening tool for cancer. A cross-sectional study in patients with mammographically dense breasts was conducted, and both HHBUS and ABUS were performed. Hand-held breast ultrasound was acquired by radiologists and ABUS by mammography technicians and analyzed by breast radiologists. We evaluated the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification of the exam and of the lesion, as well as the amount of time required to perform and read each exam. The statistical analysis employed was measures of central tendency and dispersion, frequencies, Student t test, and a univariate logistic regression, through the odds ratio and its respective 95% confidence interval, and with p < 0.05 considered of statistical significance. A total of 440 patients were evaluated. Regarding lesions, HHBUS detected 15 (7.7%) BI-RADS 2, 175 (89.3%) BI-RADS 3, and 6 (3%) BI-RADS 4, with 3 being confirmed by biopsy as invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs), and 3 false-positives. Automated breast ultrasound identified 12 (12.9%) BI-RADS 2, 75 (80.7%) BI-RADS 3, and 6 (6.4%) BI-RADS 4, including 3 lesions detected by HHBUS and confirmed as IDCs, in addition to 1 invasive lobular carcinoma and 2 high-risk lesions not detected by HHBUS. The amount of time required for the radiologist to read the ABUS was statistically inferior compared with the time required to read the HHBUS (p < 0.001). The overall concordance was 80.9%. A total of 219 lesions were detected, from those 70 lesions by both methods, 126 only by HHBUS (84.9% not suspicious by ABUS) and 23 only by ABUS. Compared with HHBUS, ABUS allowed adequate sonographic study in supplemental screening for breast cancer in heterogeneously dense and extremely dense breasts. Comparar a ultrassonografia convencional das mamas (US) com a ultrassonografia automatizada das mamas (ABUS) no rastreio do câncer. MéTODOS: Realizamos um estudo transversal com pacientes com mamas mamograficamente densas, sendo avaliadas pela US e pela ABUS. A US foi realizada por radiologistas e a ABUS por técnicos de mamografia e analisada por radiologistas especializados em mama. A classificação Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) do exame e das lesões o tempo de leitura e de aquisição foram avaliados. A análise estatística foi realizada através de medidas de tendência central, dispersão e frequências, teste t de Student e regressão logística univariada, através do odds ratio, com intervalo de confiança de 95%, e com p < 0,05 sendo considerado estatisticamente significante. Foram avaliadas 440 pacientes. Em relação às lesões, a US detectou 15 (7,7%) BI-RADS 2, 175 (89,3%) BI-RADS 3 e 6 (3%) BI-RADS 4, das quais 3 foram confirmadas, por biópsia, como carcinomas ductais invasivos e 3 falso-positivos. A ABUS identificou 12 (12,9%) BI-RADS 2, 75 (80,7%) BI-RADS 3 e 6 (6,4%) BI-RADS 4, incluindo 3 lesões detectadas pela US e confirmadas como carcinomas ductais invasivos, além de 1 carcinoma lobular invasivo e 2 lesões de alto risco não detectadas pela US. O tempo de leitura dos exames da ABUS foi estatisticamente inferior ao tempo do radiologista para realizar a US (p < 0,001). A concordância foi de 80,9%. Um total de 219 lesões foram detectadas, das quais 70 por ambos os métodos, 126 observadas apenas pela US (84,9% não eram lesões suspeitas no ABUS) e 23 apenas pela ABUS. CONCLUSãO: Comparado à US, a ABUS permitiu adequado estudo complementar no rastreio do câncer de mamas heterogeneamente densas e extremamente densas." @default.
• W3156763485 created "2021-04-26" @default.
• W3156763485 creator A5002824227 @default.
• W3156763485 creator A5035409886 @default.
• W3156763485 creator A5040967245 @default.
• W3156763485 creator A5042647916 @default.
• W3156763485 creator A5052734055 @default.
• W3156763485 creator A5063860502 @default.
• W3156763485 creator A5068869112 @default.
• W3156763485 creator A5081807960 @default.
• W3156763485 date "2021-03-01" @default.
• W3156763485 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3156763485 title "Comparison of Automated Breast Ultrasound and Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound in the Screening of Dense Breasts" @default.
• W3156763485 cites W1537982109 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W1964516862 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W1972252207 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W1973464644 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2021731869 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2022602092 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2022942333 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2023549687 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2032751303 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2036023650 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2038751842 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2060005420 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2071822996 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2077660666 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2083479314 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2096098577 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2101668496 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2103659135 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2137040237 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2144995939 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2155140373 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2165556764 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2253584488 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2294736024 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2415059400 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2523102193 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2620637213 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2745886155 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2765302585 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2790655050 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2884487212 @default.
• W3156763485 cites W2924176005 @default.
• W3156763485 doi "https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722156" @default.
• W3156763485 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33860502" @default.
• W3156763485 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3156763485 type Work @default.
• W3156763485 sameAs 3156763485 @default.
• W3156763485 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3156763485 countsByYear W31567634852023 @default.
• W3156763485 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3156763485 hasAuthorship W3156763485A5002824227 @default.
• W3156763485 hasAuthorship W3156763485A5035409886 @default.
• W3156763485 hasAuthorship W3156763485A5040967245 @default.
• W3156763485 hasAuthorship W3156763485A5042647916 @default.
• W3156763485 hasAuthorship W3156763485A5052734055 @default.
• W3156763485 hasAuthorship W3156763485A5063860502 @default.
• W3156763485 hasAuthorship W3156763485A5068869112 @default.
• W3156763485 hasAuthorship W3156763485A5081807960 @default.
• W3156763485 hasBestOaLocation W31567634851 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C144301174 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C2777423100 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C2777432617 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C2777517664 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C2779098232 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C121608353 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C126322002 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C126838900 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C143753070 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C144301174 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C151956035 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C156957248 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C160798450 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C2775934546 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C2777423100 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C2777432617 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C2777517664 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C2779098232 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C2780472235 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C38180746 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C44249647 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C530470458 @default.
• W3156763485 hasConceptScore W3156763485C71924100 @default.

• next