Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3157179062> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W3157179062 abstract "Abstract Objective: Current practice frequently fails to provide care consistent with the preferences and values of decisionally-incapacitated, critically ill patients. It also imposes significant emotional burden on their surrogates. Algorithmic-based patient preference predictors (PPPs) have been proposed as a way to address these two concerns. While previous research found that patients strongly support the use of PPPs, the views of surrogates are unknown. This study assesses the views of experienced surrogates regarding the use of PPPs as a means to improve treatment decision making for incapacitated patients. Setting: Two academic medical centers and two community hospitals. Subjects : Experienced Surrogates [n=26]. Interventions: An initial quantitative survey followed by an in-depth interview and a final quantitative survey. Measurements: Overall level of support for PPPs and views on how a PPP should be used, if at all, in practice. Main Results: Overall, 21 participants supported the use of PPPs. The remaining five indicated that they would not use a PPP because they made decisions based on the patient’s best interests, not based on which treatments the patient would choose for themselves. Some respondents expressed concern that PPPs might be used to deny expensive care or be biased against minority groups. Finally, 24 respondents indicated that surrogates, not patients, should decide how treatment decisions are made, including whether and how to use PPPs. Conclusions : Surrogates, like patients, strongly support the use of PPPs as a means to improving decision-making for incapacitated patients. These findings provide support for developing a PPP and assessing its use in practice. At the same time, patients and surrogates disagree over whose preferences should determine how treatment decisions, including whether to use a PPP, are made. These findings reveal a fundamental disagreement regarding the guiding principles for surrogate decision-making that need to be addressed by attempts to improve current critical care practice." @default.
- W3157179062 created "2021-05-10" @default.
- W3157179062 creator A5011045210 @default.
- W3157179062 creator A5026093431 @default.
- W3157179062 creator A5027974693 @default.
- W3157179062 creator A5032107349 @default.
- W3157179062 creator A5060714754 @default.
- W3157179062 creator A5065618670 @default.
- W3157179062 creator A5081757336 @default.
- W3157179062 creator A5089263902 @default.
- W3157179062 date "2021-05-06" @default.
- W3157179062 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3157179062 title "Surrogate Perspectives on a Patient Preference Predictor: Good Idea, But I Should Decide How It Is Used" @default.
- W3157179062 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-480243/v1" @default.
- W3157179062 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3157179062 type Work @default.
- W3157179062 sameAs 3157179062 @default.
- W3157179062 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W3157179062 countsByYear W31571790622022 @default.
- W3157179062 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W3157179062 hasAuthorship W3157179062A5011045210 @default.
- W3157179062 hasAuthorship W3157179062A5026093431 @default.
- W3157179062 hasAuthorship W3157179062A5027974693 @default.
- W3157179062 hasAuthorship W3157179062A5032107349 @default.
- W3157179062 hasAuthorship W3157179062A5060714754 @default.
- W3157179062 hasAuthorship W3157179062A5065618670 @default.
- W3157179062 hasAuthorship W3157179062A5081757336 @default.
- W3157179062 hasAuthorship W3157179062A5089263902 @default.
- W3157179062 hasBestOaLocation W31571790621 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C2780033181 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C118552586 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C142724271 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C144133560 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C15744967 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C162118730 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C162324750 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C175444787 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C204787440 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C27415008 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C2780033181 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C2781249084 @default.
- W3157179062 hasConceptScore W3157179062C71924100 @default.
- W3157179062 hasLocation W31571790621 @default.
- W3157179062 hasLocation W31571790622 @default.
- W3157179062 hasOpenAccess W3157179062 @default.
- W3157179062 hasPrimaryLocation W31571790621 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W1974353386 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W1985488877 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W2075877034 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W2154901060 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W2331805603 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W2333539729 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W2387420758 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W3157179062 hasRelatedWork W3147483844 @default.
- W3157179062 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3157179062 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3157179062 magId "3157179062" @default.
- W3157179062 workType "article" @default.