FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3157235522> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3157235522 abstract "Abstract Background Undergraduate medical education recognises that patient feedback is potentially valuable for student learning and development as a component of multi-source feedback. However greater exploration of how patient feedback perspectives differ to clinical educators is required for curriculum development and improving student feedback literacy. This study aimed to determine how two sources of feedback, patients and clinical tutors, compare on the same patient-centred, interpersonal criteria. Methods A patient feedback instrument designed for the undergraduate medical education setting was used to compare patients’ feedback with clinical tutors’ feedback following a student-patient consultation in the learning context. Assessments from 222 learning consultations involving 40 medical students were collected. Descriptive statistics for tutors and patients for each question were calculated and correlations between patient and tutor were explored using Spearman’s rank-order correlation. Mixed effects ordered logistic regression was used to compare each question with an overall rating for tutor and patients in addition to comparing patient with tutor ratings. Results Clinical tutor and patient assessments had a weak but significant positive correlation in all areas except questions related to respect and concern. When making judgements compared with overall assessment, patients’ ratings of respect, concern, communication and being understood in the consultation have a greater effect. After eliminating the effect of generally higher ratings by patients compared with tutors using comparative ordered logistic regression, patients rated students relatively less competent in areas of personal interaction. Conclusion This study provides insight about patient feedback, which is required to continue improving the use and acceptability of this multisource feedback to students as a valuable component of their social learning environment. We have revealed the different perspective-specific judgement that patients bring to feedback. This finding contributes to building respect for patient feedback through greater understanding of the elements of consultations for which patients can discriminate performance." @default.
• W3157235522 created "2021-05-10" @default.
• W3157235522 creator A5007552510 @default.
• W3157235522 creator A5018938287 @default.
• W3157235522 creator A5030966355 @default.
• W3157235522 creator A5072334766 @default.
• W3157235522 date "2021-04-29" @default.
• W3157235522 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3157235522 title "Exploring how differently patients and clinical tutors see the same consultation: building evidence for inclusion of real patient feedback in medical education" @default.
• W3157235522 cites W1997543660 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2015065454 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2022882262 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2110412115 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2147479106 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2252429032 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2560278326 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2571094412 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2588262856 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2589630592 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2610861956 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2759527169 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2765744011 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2769795979 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2793456933 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2801630847 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2803100670 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2884758474 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2886286229 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2891177700 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2903089648 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2916450879 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2946024051 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2947127683 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W2994913019 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W3004960267 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W3016604954 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W3080760279 @default.
• W3157235522 cites W3088037984 @default.
• W3157235522 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02654-3" @default.
• W3157235522 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8082899" @default.
• W3157235522 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33926426" @default.
• W3157235522 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3157235522 type Work @default.
• W3157235522 sameAs 3157235522 @default.
• W3157235522 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3157235522 countsByYear W31572355222023 @default.
• W3157235522 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3157235522 hasAuthorship W3157235522A5007552510 @default.
• W3157235522 hasAuthorship W3157235522A5018938287 @default.
• W3157235522 hasAuthorship W3157235522A5030966355 @default.
• W3157235522 hasAuthorship W3157235522A5072334766 @default.
• W3157235522 hasBestOaLocation W31572355221 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C164850336 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C2778371403 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C80059220 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C105795698 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C109359841 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C126322002 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C145420912 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C151730666 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C151956035 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C15744967 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C164850336 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C19417346 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C2778371403 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C2779343474 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C33923547 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C39896193 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C47177190 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C509550671 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C71924100 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C77805123 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C80059220 @default.
• W3157235522 hasConceptScore W3157235522C86803240 @default.
• W3157235522 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3157235522 hasLocation W31572355221 @default.
• W3157235522 hasLocation W31572355222 @default.
• W3157235522 hasLocation W31572355223 @default.
• W3157235522 hasLocation W31572355224 @default.
• W3157235522 hasLocation W31572355225 @default.
• W3157235522 hasOpenAccess W3157235522 @default.
• W3157235522 hasPrimaryLocation W31572355221 @default.
• W3157235522 hasRelatedWork W2111416713 @default.
• W3157235522 hasRelatedWork W2557263581 @default.

• next