FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3157433947> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3157433947 endingPage "173" @default.
• W3157433947 startingPage "173" @default.
• W3157433947 abstract "AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris (MKN) dan implikasi keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam pemeriksaan notaris. Lokasi penelitian dilakukan di Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Sulawesi Selatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Majelis Kehormatan Notaris berwenang untuk melakukan pemeriksaan dan mengeluarkan keputusan persetujuan atau penolakan terhadap pemanggilan notaris oleh penyidik, penuntut umum, atau hakim. Adanya permohonan pemeriksaan dari penyidik, penuntut umum, atau hakim maka MKN Wilayah akan membentuk majelis pemeriksa untuk memanggil, memeriksa, dan mendengarkan keterangan langsung dari notaris. Hasil pemeriksaan dari Majelis Pemeriksalah yang kemudian menjadi acuan MKN Wilayah untuk memberikan persetujuan atau menolak permohonan pemanggilan Notaris oleh penegak hukum. Keputusan persetujuan atau penolakan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Wilayah merupakan keputusan final dan tidak ada upaya lain yang dapat ditempuh bagi notaris ataupun penegak hukum sehingga akibatnya pihak-pihak terkait harus menjalankan keputusan tersebut. Bahkan berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 66 Ayat (3) dan (4) UUJN ditentukan bahwa jika dalam jangka waktu 30 (tiga puluh) hari. MKN Wilayah tidak memberikan jawaban maka dianggap memberikan persetujuan. Dengan demikian proses pemanggilan harus tetap dilaksanakan. Hal ini dapat merugikan notaris, karena seharusnya MKN Wilayah dapat menyatakan sikap atau pertimbangannya.Kata Kunci: Keputusan, Majelis Kehormatan Notaris, Notaris AbstractThis study aimed to determine and analyze the authority of the Notary Public Honorary Board (MKN) in the investigation of the notary and to know and analyze the implications of the Decision of the Notary Honorary Board in the investigation of notaries. The location of the research was conducted in the Regional Office of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of South Sulawesi. The results of the study indicate that the Honorary Board of Notary is authorized to conduct an investigation and issue a decision on approval or rejection of a call of a notary by an investigator, public prosecutor or judge. With the existence of an investigation request from the investigator, public prosecutor, or judge then the Regional Notary Honorary Board will form an investigator board to call, examine, and listen to the direct statement from the notary. The result of an investigation from the Investigator Board then becomes the reference of Regional MKN to give approval or reject the request of the notary calling by the law enforcer. The decision of the approval or rejection of the Regional Notary Honorary Board of the Notary is final and there is no other attempt that can be taken by the notary or law enforcers so that the parties concerned must follow the decision. Indeed, based on the provisions of Article 66 Paragraph (3) and (4) of Law on Notary Position (UUJN) it is stipulated that if within 30 (thirty) days. Regional MKN does not give an answer it is considered to give consent. Therefore the calling process must keep running. This may harm notary, because it is supposed that Regional MKN can state its position or consideration.Keywords: Decision, Honorary Board of Notary, Notary" @default.
• W3157433947 created "2021-05-10" @default.
• W3157433947 creator A5037583181 @default.
• W3157433947 creator A5069577853 @default.
• W3157433947 creator A5080339684 @default.
• W3157433947 date "2018-11-19" @default.
• W3157433947 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W3157433947 title "ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN MAJELIS KEHORMATAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMERIKSAAN NOTARIS" @default.
• W3157433947 doi "https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v2i2.5965" @default.
• W3157433947 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W3157433947 type Work @default.
• W3157433947 sameAs 3157433947 @default.
• W3157433947 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3157433947 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3157433947 hasAuthorship W3157433947A5037583181 @default.
• W3157433947 hasAuthorship W3157433947A5069577853 @default.
• W3157433947 hasAuthorship W3157433947A5080339684 @default.
• W3157433947 hasBestOaLocation W31574339471 @default.
• W3157433947 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W3157433947 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W3157433947 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3157433947 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3157433947 hasConceptScore W3157433947C142362112 @default.
• W3157433947 hasConceptScore W3157433947C15708023 @default.
• W3157433947 hasConceptScore W3157433947C17744445 @default.
• W3157433947 hasConceptScore W3157433947C199539241 @default.
• W3157433947 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3157433947 hasLocation W31574339471 @default.
• W3157433947 hasOpenAccess W3157433947 @default.
• W3157433947 hasPrimaryLocation W31574339471 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W1589203209 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W2016717044 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W2557454913 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W2603296253 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W2888947023 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W3003325775 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W4234480004 @default.
• W3157433947 hasRelatedWork W93312527 @default.
• W3157433947 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W3157433947 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3157433947 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3157433947 magId "3157433947" @default.
• W3157433947 workType "article" @default.