FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3158099808> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3158099808 endingPage "100717" @default.
• W3158099808 startingPage "100717" @default.
• W3158099808 abstract "Heat shock 70 kDa protein (Hsp70) chaperones play a crucial role in the biogenesis of tail-anchored proteins (TAs), starting a downstream cascade to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via the guided-entry-of-tail-anchored protein (GET) pathway. J-domain proteins (JDPs) are generally known to assist Hsp70s, but their specific role in TA targeting remains unclear. Cho et al. now identify two separate functions for JDPs in the process, in the initial capture of the TA and the transfer into the GET pathway. These data suggest that several Hsp70 cycles could be involved at distinct steps during protein maturation. Heat shock 70 kDa protein (Hsp70) chaperones play a crucial role in the biogenesis of tail-anchored proteins (TAs), starting a downstream cascade to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via the guided-entry-of-tail-anchored protein (GET) pathway. J-domain proteins (JDPs) are generally known to assist Hsp70s, but their specific role in TA targeting remains unclear. Cho et al. now identify two separate functions for JDPs in the process, in the initial capture of the TA and the transfer into the GET pathway. These data suggest that several Hsp70 cycles could be involved at distinct steps during protein maturation. Molecular chaperones assist protein folding in the cell, with heat shock 70 kDa protein (Hsp70) and Hsp90 being the most abundant and conserved chaperone families (1Saibil H. Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013; 14: 630-642Crossref PubMed Scopus (529) Google Scholar). In general, chaperones bind to folding intermediates to prepare them for further maturation, such as folding into the native state or sorting into the right pathway. Their activity is controlled by an ATP cycle, which is regulated by cochaperones. In the case of the Hsp70 family, this cycle is assisted by two types of cochaperones: JDPs that promote substrate entry into the Hsp70 binding cleft by stimulating ATP hydrolysis and nucleotide exchange factors that promote ADP release and subsequent ATP rebinding, allowing substrate leaving the cleft (1Saibil H. Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013; 14: 630-642Crossref PubMed Scopus (529) Google Scholar). When the substrate is released from Hsp70, cochaperones can channel it into one of several downstream pathways, such as folding, proteasomal degradation, or targeting to the membrane (Fig. 1). One class of substrates, the TAs—integral membrane proteins containing a C-terminal hydrophobic transmembrane domain (TMD) —are known to be channeled into the GET secretory pathway (2Hegde R.S. Keenan R.J. Tail-anchored membrane protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011; 12: 787-798Crossref PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar, 3Shan S.O. Guiding tail-anchored membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum in a chaperone cascade.J. Biol. Chem. 2019; 294: 16577-16586Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar). TA maturation requires several steps for the proteins to reach their target membrane, the ER via the GET pathway (2Hegde R.S. Keenan R.J. Tail-anchored membrane protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011; 12: 787-798Crossref PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar, 3Shan S.O. Guiding tail-anchored membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum in a chaperone cascade.J. Biol. Chem. 2019; 294: 16577-16586Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar). TAs initially interact with Hsp70 upon their release from the ribosome and are then handed off to the cochaperone Small glutamine-rich tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein 2 (Sgt2) followed by Guided entry of tail-anchored proteins factor 3 (2Hegde R.S. Keenan R.J. Tail-anchored membrane protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011; 12: 787-798Crossref PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar, 3Shan S.O. Guiding tail-anchored membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum in a chaperone cascade.J. Biol. Chem. 2019; 294: 16577-16586Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar). After subsequent transfer to ER membrane receptors Get1/2, TAs are inserted into the ER membrane. While passaging through the cytosol, Hsp70 keeps the TMD soluble, preventing misfolding and aggregation, and also, it targets the TAs to the appropriate membrane. The initial targeting of Hsp70 to a particular substrate is assisted by JDPs, using variable substrate-binding domains of their own (4Kampinga H.H. Craig E.A. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010; 11: 579-592Crossref PubMed Scopus (979) Google Scholar, 5Kityk R. Kopp J. Mayer M.P. Molecular mechanism of J-domain-triggered ATP hydrolysis by Hsp70 chaperones.Mol. Cell. 2018; 69: 227-237.e224Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar). However, whether JDPs perform this role in TA targeting, how the multiple cellular JDPs are partitioned into this versus other processes, and whether the JDPs assist with other functions remain unclear. Publishing in JBC, Cho et al. (6Cho H. Shim W.J. Liu Y. Shan S.O. J-domain proteins promote client relay from Hsp70 during tail-anchored membrane protein targeting.J. Biol. Chem. 2021; 296: 100546Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar) propose a model for the Hsp70/JDP-mediated transport of TAs into the GET pathway in which Ydj1 and Sis1, the two most abundant yeast JDPs, contribute to regulating the conformation of Hsp70-bound TAs during membrane protein biogenesis. Cho et al. started their investigation by asking whether Ydj1 and Sis1 enhance the ability of Ssa1 to capture TAs and keep them in the soluble form. They used a hybrid protein containing Bos1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae membrane protein strongly dependent on the GET pathway, as their TA model. Cho et al. specifically mutated Ydj1 in its J-domain to abolish Hsp70 ATPase activation and created a Ydj1 fragment with a truncated substrate-binding domain (JD-GF). Subsequently, they monitored the ability of Ssa1 to maintain Bos1 solubility using turbidity and sedimentation assays. These experiments revealed that ATPase activation mediated by a functional J-domain is required for TA binding by Ssa1. Assays with Sis1 showed it does not prevent Bos1 aggregation, meaning that this cochaperone is not able to target Bos1. Would its inability to capture Bos1 now prevent Sis1 from playing a role in targeting this TA protein to the membrane? The authors next tested both Ydj1 and Sis1 for their ability to stimulate TA transfer from Ssa1 to Sgt2. Monitoring Bos1 transfer from Ssa1 to Sgt2 via a photocrosslinker integrated into the Bos1 TMD revealed, unexpectedly, that both Ydj1 and Sis1 enhance substrate transfer. Consistently, also genetic experiments revealed that both JDPs can substitute each other to promote TA membrane insertion. Thus, despite the inability of Sis1 to synergize with Ssa1 during TA capture, it can enhance Ssa1-to-Sgt2 TA transfer. To identify the functional elements in this step, the authors mutated both JDPs in the ATP-stimulating motif in the J-domain and partially deleted the substrate-binding domains. Monitoring TA transfer by crosslinking revealed that the functional J-domain is crucial, and differences between the Ydj1 and Sis1 substrate-binding domains did not have an impact. These data suggest that the ability of the JDPs to enhance TA transfer depends on stimulation of Hsp70 ATPase activity by functional J-domains. To pilot TA proteins into the GET stream, Hsp70s must capture and then transfer substrates to Sgt2. The data from Cho et al. demonstrate that both of these steps are stimulated by JDPs. However, as Sis1 can stimulate only the second but not the first event, this means that there are two independent steps involving ATP hydrolysis by Hsp70 and thus at least two Hsp70 ATP cycles required before the Hsp70 reaches the GET pathway (Fig. 1). If the first ATP cycle is dedicated to capturing the aggregation-prone and highly hydrophobic TMD, the second cycle may serve a different purpose. The authors conclude that the second ATP hydrolysis induces Ssa1 to bind the substrate in a conformation more conducive to transfer. We suggest that these findings may even be taken one step further. Hsp70 ATP hydrolysis is coupled to substrate-binding events, and analysis of the N-terminal domain preceding the Bos1 TMD reveals six potential stretches that could serve as Hsp70-binding sites (7Rüdiger S. Germeroth L. Schneider-Mergener J. Bukau B. Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose-bound peptide libraries.EMBO J. 1997; 16: 1501-1507Crossref PubMed Scopus (621) Google Scholar). Thus, a second Hsp70 may bind the substrate, either adding another flag recruiting Sgt2 or potentially further unfolding this domain to possibly increase affinity for Sgt2. Such an unfolding-related mechanism is consistent with earlier findings of bacterial Hsp70, DnaK, rebinding to potential multiple binding sites in luciferase (8Morán Luengo T. Kityk R. Mayer M.P. Rüdiger S.G.D. Hsp90 breaks the deadlock of the Hsp70 chaperone system.Mol. Cell. 2018; 70: 545-552.e549Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar) and in rhodanese (9Kellner R. Hofmann H. Barducci A. Wunderlich B. Nettels D. Schuler B. Single-molecule spectroscopy reveals chaperone-mediated expansion of substrate protein.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014; 111: 13355-13360Crossref PubMed Scopus (72) Google Scholar). This Hsp70 double act beautifully illustrates the necessary versatility of the JDP proteins. The Hsp70 captain knows how to power the boat, but the JDP pilots ensure the vessel navigates to the right target, and this may involve more than one JDP, as in metazoan disaggregation (10Nillegoda N.B. Kirstein J. Szlachcic A. Berynskyy M. Stank A. Stengel F. Arnsburg K. Gao X. Scior A. Aebersold R. Guilbride D.L. Wade R.C. Morimoto R.I. Mayer M.P. Bukau B. Crucial HSP70 co-chaperone complex unlocks metazoan protein disaggregation.Nature. 2015; 524: 247-251Crossref PubMed Scopus (178) Google Scholar). The beauty of the GET entry process is that it shows that Hsp70 binding has different functions, even for the same substrate protein. It will now be exciting to investigate the differences in what happens at molecular level to the Hsp70 substrate in the two different cycles. The double JDP piloting explored by Cho et al. may offer an experimental route to this important question. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article." @default.
• W3158099808 created "2021-05-10" @default.
• W3158099808 creator A5078715883 @default.
• W3158099808 creator A5088422438 @default.
• W3158099808 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W3158099808 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3158099808 title "Double J-domain piloting of an Hsp70 substrate" @default.
• W3158099808 cites W1972121275 @default.
• W3158099808 cites W1997718936 @default.
• W3158099808 cites W2053673239 @default.
• W3158099808 cites W2065504621 @default.
• W3158099808 cites W2072313843 @default.
• W3158099808 cites W2214677303 @default.
• W3158099808 cites W2780354290 @default.
• W3158099808 cites W2801645577 @default.
• W3158099808 cites W2979161746 @default.
• W3158099808 cites W3136351707 @default.
• W3158099808 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100717" @default.
• W3158099808 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8164044" @default.
• W3158099808 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33930465" @default.
• W3158099808 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3158099808 type Work @default.
• W3158099808 sameAs 3158099808 @default.
• W3158099808 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3158099808 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3158099808 hasAuthorship W3158099808A5078715883 @default.
• W3158099808 hasAuthorship W3158099808A5088422438 @default.
• W3158099808 hasBestOaLocation W31580998081 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConcept C2777289219 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConcept C36503486 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConceptScore W3158099808C134306372 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConceptScore W3158099808C185592680 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConceptScore W3158099808C18903297 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConceptScore W3158099808C2777289219 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConceptScore W3158099808C33923547 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConceptScore W3158099808C36503486 @default.
• W3158099808 hasConceptScore W3158099808C86803240 @default.
• W3158099808 hasFunder F4320321007 @default.
• W3158099808 hasFunder F4320326729 @default.
• W3158099808 hasLocation W31580998081 @default.
• W3158099808 hasLocation W31580998082 @default.
• W3158099808 hasLocation W31580998083 @default.
• W3158099808 hasOpenAccess W3158099808 @default.
• W3158099808 hasPrimaryLocation W31580998081 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W1531601525 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W1990781990 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W2077401812 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W2606230654 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W2607424097 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W2948807893 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W2949912922 @default.
• W3158099808 hasRelatedWork W2778153218 @default.
• W3158099808 hasVolume "296" @default.
• W3158099808 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3158099808 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3158099808 magId "3158099808" @default.
• W3158099808 workType "article" @default.