FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3160227356> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3160227356 endingPage "1953" @default.
• W3160227356 startingPage "1930" @default.
• W3160227356 abstract "Purpose Keeping in mind the growing significance of online reviews, management of responses to the customer reviews – webcare – is becoming important in recent times. How a firm responds to online reviews can send a signal to the readers of the reviews contributing to their brand evaluations. From a strategic perspective, a firm should decide if they should respond to all reviews or respond to only a select few reviews. This study aims to provide an understanding of how exhaustive and selective webcare influence brand evaluations. It also explores the role of review balance and review frame, which potentially act as moderators, on such influences. Design/methodology/approach Three scenario-based experiments were used to manipulate the webcare strategy (exhaustive-selective) and the potential moderators (review balance and review frame). The 910 participants of the single-stage experiments were identified using an online panel managed by UK-based Prolific Academic. Findings Exhaustive webcare is found to be the most effective strategy for influencing brand evaluations in all conditions. Also, two interesting results were found, which can have practical implications. A selective negative strategy is as effective as an exhaustive webcare in almost all cases, and a selective positive webcare is as good as not having a webcare in nearly all cases. Changes in webcare effectiveness due to the influence of review balance and review frame were established. Research limitations/implications With the review reader perspective and focus on brand management, this study may trigger enquiries into effects of webcare strategies on brand evaluations and other outcomes such as word-of-mouth. The interaction effects of the various strategies adopted together on brand evaluation and loyalty have not been explored and would be of interest to academicians and managers. Practical implications Firms need to plan a careful resource deployment while responding to the online consumer reviews as responding to a select few reviews may yield the same effects as that of exhaustive webcare. Brand managers may find responding only to positive reviews futile, as it could be as good as having no webcare. Also, the strategy of responding to reviews needs to be adapted based on the online review platform where the set in which the review is read is different. Originality/value This is one of the few studies focusing on the effects of webcare on brand evaluations from a review reader perspective as against the dominant reviewer perspective. This research also presents hitherto unexplored effects of an exhaustive-selective webcare strategy on brand evaluations." @default.
• W3160227356 created "2021-05-24" @default.
• W3160227356 creator A5039429496 @default.
• W3160227356 creator A5042816684 @default.
• W3160227356 date "2021-05-07" @default.
• W3160227356 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3160227356 title "Webcare as a signal: exhaustive-selective webcare strategy and brand evaluation" @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1599808469 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1614399520 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1753246547 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1787600747 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1976238008 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1977161640 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1982986353 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1983976677 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1986733146 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1991622328 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W1993161486 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2011659350 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2012668191 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2014101371 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2016878647 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2019476735 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2025569312 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2030905385 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2032133540 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2034725519 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2035102161 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2039065374 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2040384293 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2049702279 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2050239198 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2051272671 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2051473243 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2061609477 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2063985808 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2069927273 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2073654928 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2073774300 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2088919525 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2089132857 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2091573081 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2092058590 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2095637091 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2096033973 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2112256230 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2114023511 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2115747715 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2121685903 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2122027164 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2131238140 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2132190336 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2138800209 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2179200719 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2181024084 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2201929092 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2262553232 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2281806710 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2304011664 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2328832051 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2335710260 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2465157137 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2523372191 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2584114422 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2586885238 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2603822349 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2613515588 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2766424438 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2769310279 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2787390741 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2787778318 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2900387227 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2910638599 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W2980085101 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W3005341561 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W3008081572 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W3010928409 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W3123091093 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W3124648860 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W4238615709 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W4240199737 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W4252483528 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W4255659084 @default.
• W3160227356 cites W787056079 @default.
• W3160227356 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-05-2019-0421" @default.
• W3160227356 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3160227356 type Work @default.
• W3160227356 sameAs 3160227356 @default.
• W3160227356 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3160227356 countsByYear W31602273562022 @default.
• W3160227356 countsByYear W31602273562023 @default.
• W3160227356 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3160227356 hasAuthorship W3160227356A5039429496 @default.
• W3160227356 hasAuthorship W3160227356A5042816684 @default.
• W3160227356 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W3160227356 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3160227356 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3160227356 hasConcept C15744967 @default.

• next