Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3160781704> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W3160781704 endingPage "373" @default.
- W3160781704 startingPage "356" @default.
- W3160781704 abstract "User stories are primary requirements artifacts within agile methods. They are comprised of short sentences written in natural language expressing units of functionality for the to-be system. Despite their simple format, when modelers are faced with a set of user stories they might be having difficulty in sorting them, evaluating their redundancy, and assessing their relevancy in the effort to prioritize them. The present paper tests the ability of modelers to understand the requirements problem through a visual representation (named the Rationale Tree) which is a conceptual model and is built out of a user stories’ set. The paper is built upon and extends previous work relating to the feasibility of generating such a representation out of a user stories’ set by comparing the performance of the Rationale Tree with the User Story Mapping approach. This is achieved by performing a two-group quantitative comparative study. The identified comparative variables for each method were understandability, recognition of missing requirements/epics/themes, and adaptability. The Rational Tree was not easy to understand and did not perform as anticipated in assisting with the recognition of missing requirements/epics/themes. However, its employment allowed modelers to offer qualitative representations of a specific software problem. Overall, the present experiment evaluates whether a conceptual model could be a consistent solution towards the holistic comprehension of a software development problem within an agile setting, compared to more ‘conventional’ techniques used so far." @default.
- W3160781704 created "2021-05-24" @default.
- W3160781704 creator A5000467223 @default.
- W3160781704 creator A5021408893 @default.
- W3160781704 creator A5036070725 @default.
- W3160781704 creator A5048707771 @default.
- W3160781704 creator A5067655880 @default.
- W3160781704 date "2021-01-01" @default.
- W3160781704 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W3160781704 title "Conceptual Modeling Versus User Story Mapping: Which is the Best Approach to Agile Requirements Engineering?" @default.
- W3160781704 cites W1893648522 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W1965251925 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2106623896 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2163851162 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2334498876 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2380928205 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2507174074 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2616233103 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2622958941 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2790903144 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2945526390 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W2990628842 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W3011435829 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W3104943162 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W3120514728 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W4291213652 @default.
- W3160781704 cites W4299515296 @default.
- W3160781704 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75018-3_24" @default.
- W3160781704 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3160781704 type Work @default.
- W3160781704 sameAs 3160781704 @default.
- W3160781704 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W3160781704 countsByYear W31607817042022 @default.
- W3160781704 countsByYear W31607817042023 @default.
- W3160781704 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
- W3160781704 hasAuthorship W3160781704A5000467223 @default.
- W3160781704 hasAuthorship W3160781704A5021408893 @default.
- W3160781704 hasAuthorship W3160781704A5036070725 @default.
- W3160781704 hasAuthorship W3160781704A5048707771 @default.
- W3160781704 hasAuthorship W3160781704A5067655880 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C11189718 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C115903868 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C13606891 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C14185376 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C180152950 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C36837802 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C529173508 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C11189718 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C115903868 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C127413603 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C13606891 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C14185376 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C180152950 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C199360897 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C201995342 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C2777904410 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C36837802 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C41008148 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C529173508 @default.
- W3160781704 hasConceptScore W3160781704C77088390 @default.
- W3160781704 hasLocation W31607817041 @default.
- W3160781704 hasOpenAccess W3160781704 @default.
- W3160781704 hasPrimaryLocation W31607817041 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W1560768376 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W2108761628 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W2139627947 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W2145240044 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W2380928205 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W2765674122 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W2905107755 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W4252638519 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W4312418467 @default.
- W3160781704 hasRelatedWork W981621044 @default.
- W3160781704 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3160781704 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3160781704 magId "3160781704" @default.
- W3160781704 workType "book-chapter" @default.