FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3160936072> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3160936072 endingPage "e27736" @default.
• W3160936072 startingPage "e27736" @default.
• W3160936072 abstract "Background Effective pedagogy that encourages high standards of excellence and commitment to lifelong learning is essential in health professions education to prepare students for real-life challenges such as health disparities and global health issues. Creative learning and innovative teaching strategies empower students with high-quality, practical, real-world knowledge and meaningful skills to reach their potential as future health care providers. Objective The aim of this study was to explore health profession students’ perceptions of whether their learning experiences were associated with good or bad pedagogy during asynchronous discussion forums. The further objective of the study was to identify how perceptions of the best and worst pedagogical practices reflected the students’ values, beliefs, and understanding about factors that made a pedagogy good during their learning history. Methods A netnographic qualitative design was employed in this study. The data were collected on February 3, 2020 by exporting archived data from multiple sessions of a graduate-level nursing course offered between the fall 2016 and spring 2020 semesters at a large private university in the southeast region of the United States. Each student was a data unit. As an immersive data operation, field notes were taken by all research members. Data management and analysis were performed with NVivo 12. Results A total of 634 posts were generated by 153 students identified in the dataset. Most of these students were female (88.9%). From the 97 categories identified, four themes emerged: (T) teacher presence built through relationship and communication, (E) environment conducive to affective and cognitive learning, (A) assessment and feedback processes that yield a growth mindset, and (M) mobilization of pedagogy through learner- and community-centeredness. Conclusions The themes that emerged from our analysis confirm findings from previous studies and provide new insights. Our study highlights the value of technology as a tool for effective pedagogy. A resourceful teacher can use various communication techniques to develop meaningful connections between the learner and teacher. Styles of communication will vary according to the unique expectations and needs of learners with different learning preferences; however, the aim is to fully engage each learner, establish a rapport between and among students, and nurture an environment characterized by freedom of expression in which ideas flow freely. We suggest that future research continue to explore the influence of differing course formats and pedagogical modalities on student learning experiences." @default.
• W3160936072 created "2021-05-24" @default.
• W3160936072 creator A5004483055 @default.
• W3160936072 creator A5009919846 @default.
• W3160936072 creator A5023063525 @default.
• W3160936072 creator A5047404798 @default.
• W3160936072 creator A5062821017 @default.
• W3160936072 creator A5063191798 @default.
• W3160936072 creator A5070353502 @default.
• W3160936072 creator A5072099601 @default.
• W3160936072 creator A5077233835 @default.
• W3160936072 date "2021-06-22" @default.
• W3160936072 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W3160936072 title "Nursing Students’ Perceptions about Effective Pedagogy: Netnographic Analysis" @default.
• W3160936072 cites W1569499140 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W1721448276 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W1914638676 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2011182411 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2014858765 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2027899246 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2071329738 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2076587925 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2103879113 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2119366833 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2149848137 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2324748196 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2337517619 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2400293351 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2420655142 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2485250036 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2729828062 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2891696678 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2903881509 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2905596437 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2913920211 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W2944194138 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W3007333477 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W3120794631 @default.
• W3160936072 cites W4249898500 @default.
• W3160936072 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/27736" @default.
• W3160936072 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8277346" @default.
• W3160936072 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34156337" @default.
• W3160936072 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3160936072 type Work @default.
• W3160936072 sameAs 3160936072 @default.
• W3160936072 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3160936072 countsByYear W31609360722022 @default.
• W3160936072 countsByYear W31609360722023 @default.
• W3160936072 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3160936072 hasAuthorship W3160936072A5004483055 @default.
• W3160936072 hasAuthorship W3160936072A5009919846 @default.
• W3160936072 hasAuthorship W3160936072A5023063525 @default.
• W3160936072 hasAuthorship W3160936072A5047404798 @default.
• W3160936072 hasAuthorship W3160936072A5062821017 @default.
• W3160936072 hasAuthorship W3160936072A5063191798 @default.
• W3160936072 hasAuthorship W3160936072A5070353502 @default.
• W3160936072 hasAuthorship W3160936072A5072099601 @default.
• W3160936072 hasAuthorship W3160936072A5077233835 @default.
• W3160936072 hasBestOaLocation W31609360721 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C108771440 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C113616995 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C2777352838 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConcept C87156501 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C108771440 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C113616995 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C119857082 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C144024400 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C15744967 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C159110408 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C160735492 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C17744445 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C190248442 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C19417346 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C199539241 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C2777352838 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C36289849 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C41008148 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C509550671 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C71924100 @default.
• W3160936072 hasConceptScore W3160936072C87156501 @default.
• W3160936072 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3160936072 hasLocation W31609360721 @default.
• W3160936072 hasLocation W31609360722 @default.
• W3160936072 hasOpenAccess W3160936072 @default.
• W3160936072 hasPrimaryLocation W31609360721 @default.

• next