FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3161036724> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3161036724 abstract "Abstract Difficult intubations can require advanced intubation techniques. Studies point to potential advantages of combined techniques using video laryngoscopes (VL) and dynamic stylets for anticipated difficult intubations. This study is designed to compare combined techniques to awake and asleep fiberoptic (FOB) techniques. Methods: 138,387 consecutive anaesthesia cases were reviewed for use of: FOB awake, FOB asleep, or combined technique (VL for visualization and either a FOB or a novel TCI TM articulating introducer ((TCI TM ; Through The Cords, LLC; Salt Lake City, UT)) as dynamic stylets as a primary approach for anticipated difficult intubations. Primary end points measured: first attempt success rate, failure to intubate with the primary technique, “in-room to intubation’ time, reported traumatic intubation rate, and reported ease of intubation. Results: Significant differences were found between techniques. First pass success rate was highest in combined techniques (either VL + FOB or VL + TCI TM ) (88.7%) followed by FOB awake (74.2%, P<0.001) and FOB asleep (80.7%, P=0.06). “Failure to intubate with the primary technique” was lowest in combined techniques (1.8%) followed by FOB asleep (4.6%, P=0.11) and FOB awake (9.2%, P=0.002). “In room to intubated” time was fastest in combined techniques (13.0 minutes) followed by FOB asleep (15.1 minutes, P=0.002) and FOB awake (21.2 minutes, P<0.001). Combined techniques were rated as ‘easy’ more often (72%) followed by FOB asleep (62.9%, P=0.12) and FOB awake (38.2%, P<0.001). Combined techniques were rated as “atraumatic” more often (91.1%) followed by FOB asleep (89.4%, P=0.91) and FOB awake (75.8%, P<0.001). In subgroup analysis of combined techniques, VL + TCI TM had the highest first attempt success rate (90.2%), lowest failure rate (1%, P=0.56), and shortest “in room to intubated time” (12.1 minutes, P=0.12). It was also rated as easy” (83.3%, P<0.001), and “atraumatic“ (96.1%, P=0.009) more often than VL + FOB, FOB awake or FOB asleep. Conclusions: Combined techniques outperformed FOB techniques in terms of effectiveness, speed, ease of use, and patient injury in patients with risk factors for difficult intubation. As a sub-group of combined technique, VL + TCI TM outperformed all other techniques. Combined techniques should be considered when managing difficult intubations." @default.
• W3161036724 created "2021-05-24" @default.
• W3161036724 creator A5010705806 @default.
• W3161036724 creator A5016500381 @default.
• W3161036724 creator A5024113254 @default.
• W3161036724 creator A5061198124 @default.
• W3161036724 creator A5071829828 @default.
• W3161036724 creator A5072126994 @default.
• W3161036724 creator A5080069325 @default.
• W3161036724 date "2021-05-05" @default.
• W3161036724 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3161036724 title "Are Combined Techniques Using Video Laryngoscopes and Dynamic Stylets Superior to Fiberoptic Techniques for Anticipated Difficult Intubations? A Retrospective Case Control Study" @default.
• W3161036724 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-446796/v1" @default.
• W3161036724 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3161036724 type Work @default.
• W3161036724 sameAs 3161036724 @default.
• W3161036724 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3161036724 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3161036724 hasAuthorship W3161036724A5010705806 @default.
• W3161036724 hasAuthorship W3161036724A5016500381 @default.
• W3161036724 hasAuthorship W3161036724A5024113254 @default.
• W3161036724 hasAuthorship W3161036724A5061198124 @default.
• W3161036724 hasAuthorship W3161036724A5071829828 @default.
• W3161036724 hasAuthorship W3161036724A5072126994 @default.
• W3161036724 hasAuthorship W3161036724A5080069325 @default.
• W3161036724 hasBestOaLocation W31610367241 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConcept C2778029997 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConcept C2910000593 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConceptScore W3161036724C141071460 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConceptScore W3161036724C2778029997 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConceptScore W3161036724C2778716859 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConceptScore W3161036724C2910000593 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConceptScore W3161036724C42219234 @default.
• W3161036724 hasConceptScore W3161036724C71924100 @default.
• W3161036724 hasLocation W31610367241 @default.
• W3161036724 hasOpenAccess W3161036724 @default.
• W3161036724 hasPrimaryLocation W31610367241 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W1972232503 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W2023459510 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W2044504567 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W2066149173 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W2075210086 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W2088082095 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W2164235683 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W2205192768 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W2469328644 @default.
• W3161036724 hasRelatedWork W2948988660 @default.
• W3161036724 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3161036724 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3161036724 magId "3161036724" @default.
• W3161036724 workType "article" @default.