FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3161584532> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3161584532 endingPage "240" @default.
• W3161584532 startingPage "222" @default.
• W3161584532 abstract "Introduction1970s social scientists widely accepted two ideas about human nature. First, people are generally rational and their thinking is normally sound. Second, emotions such as fear, affection, and hatred explain most of the occasions on which people become irrational. Our study challenged both of these assumptions without discussing them directly. From 1970s to 2000s, Kanehman and Tversky analyzed systematic errors in thinking of normal people, and the present researchers traced these errors to the operation of the machinery of cognition rather than to the corruption of thought by emotions. Kanehman and Tversky showed that the aforementioned assumptions were actually wrong and intelligent people may be susceptible to irrationality too; therefore, intelligent people often make irrational decisions and use their intuitions more than reasoning to solve problems. Naturally, emotions are provoked immediately and have more power than the intellect. Therefore, there are two systems in the mind. System 1 operates automatically and quickly, with little or no effort and no sense of voluntary control. System 2 allocates attention to the effortful mental activities that demand it, including complex computations. The operations of System 2 are often associated with the subjective experience of agency, choice, and concentration (Kahneman, 2011). System 1 operates automatically, intuitively, quickly, instinctively, without much effort, and draws conclusions from judgments based on evidence which might not be strong enough, but System 2 is inferential, contemplative, calculating and self-aware, requires effort, is focused, and always slow. Then, students found judgement heuristic quite useful, but sometimes misleading. Therefore, in researchers' viewpoints, man is essentially irrational and cannot always avoid bias. The main objective of this study was to investigate the independence of intelligence quotient (IQ) from rationality quotient (RQ) among students of Humanities and Basic Sciences Students at Yasouj University.   Research questionsIs there any statistically significant difference in the IQ level of students in different fields of study?Is there any statistically significant difference in the RQ level of students in different fields of study?Is there any statistically significant difference between IQ and RQ levels of students in different fields of study?Is there any statistically significant difference in the average IQ level of students who got high or low RQ scores? MethodsThe present researchers benefitted from survey method, and thus the quantitative approach to research for conducting the present study. The statistical population of this study were 137 first semester students of mathematics, physic, psychology, and sociology at Yasouj University in the 2019 academic year. The study sample included 70 students selected through classified sampling. The Comprehensive Assessment of Rational Thinking (CART) scale (Stanovich, West, & Toplak, 2016) was used to measure the RQ of participants. Furthermore, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WISC-III) was used to measure the IQ of participants. ANOVA and t-test were then run to analyze the obtained data. ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between students of Humanities and Basic sciences in their levels of IQ and RQ. In other words, there was no statistically significant difference between students of mathematics, physics, sociology and psychology in their levels of IQ and RQ. Moreover, participants' IQ level was higher than their RQ level. The results further indicated that participants with high and low IQ scores had the same level of cognitive and intellectual errors and biases. Therefore, it was revealed that IQ was independent from RQ.DiscussionAre the intelligent necessarily rational? According to the findings of the present study, rationality has no place in the Iranian education system. In other words, the Iranian education system ignores rationality and its importance in students' lives. In addition, the Iranian education system is an elite system based on which logical-mathematical intelligence is considered as the most important criterion for assessing students' cognitive ability. This is clearly reflected in the principles and practices of the National Elite Foundation. Indeed, if the Iranian education system is to teach Iranian students something which has not yet been taught, it is rationality. Based on the findings of the present study, the country's curriculum developers should replace the Platonic-Spencer imitative question Which type of knowledge is more valuable? with the more critical questions Should the concept of education be based on intelligence or rationality?" @default.
• W3161584532 created "2021-05-24" @default.
• W3161584532 creator A5018521858 @default.
• W3161584532 creator A5035710352 @default.
• W3161584532 creator A5058000306 @default.
• W3161584532 date "2021-02-19" @default.
• W3161584532 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3161584532 title "A study on the Independence of Intelligence Quotient from Rationality Quotient Among Students of Humanities and Basic Sciences" @default.
• W3161584532 doi "https://doi.org/10.22099/jcr.2021.6055" @default.
• W3161584532 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3161584532 type Work @default.
• W3161584532 sameAs 3161584532 @default.
• W3161584532 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3161584532 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3161584532 hasAuthorship W3161584532A5018521858 @default.
• W3161584532 hasAuthorship W3161584532A5035710352 @default.
• W3161584532 hasAuthorship W3161584532A5058000306 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C201717286 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C2777019708 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C2780595226 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConcept C94931360 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C111472728 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C138885662 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C15744967 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C180747234 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C201717286 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C2524010 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C2777019708 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C2780595226 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C33923547 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C77805123 @default.
• W3161584532 hasConceptScore W3161584532C94931360 @default.
• W3161584532 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3161584532 hasLocation W31615845321 @default.
• W3161584532 hasOpenAccess W3161584532 @default.
• W3161584532 hasPrimaryLocation W31615845321 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W1671236738 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W1969232729 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W1981825166 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2006942639 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2009766421 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2025331499 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2031000283 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2059122488 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2063064741 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2138536027 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2257118290 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2346830978 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2588919571 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W266046411 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2990682992 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W3091258236 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W3181095517 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W3199901156 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2189139884 @default.
• W3161584532 hasRelatedWork W2604248415 @default.
• W3161584532 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W3161584532 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3161584532 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3161584532 magId "3161584532" @default.
• W3161584532 workType "article" @default.