FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3161690147> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3161690147 abstract "Existing guidelines do not settle on a specific length to indicate surgical incision of subseptations because of differences in the four published diagnostic methods: AFS-10 mm classification, 1988/2003, ESHRE-ESGE classification, 2013, ASRM criteria, 2016- and 5.9-mm length cut-off, 2017. With this review and data analysis we sought to identify the classification method with the most accurate association with early pregnancy loss, as to identify a subseptation length cut-off to indicate surgical correction.We performed an exhaustive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until April 20, 2020 (limited to articles published in English) of the terms uterine septum, arcuate uterus, subseptation, Müllerian anomalies, from 1980-2020. After identifying all the available classifications for uterine subseptations, we performed a secondary data analysis of our departmental database on uterine subseptations and compared the identified classification criteria. Measurement of the subseptation's length was obtained on 2-D and 3-D ultrasound in accordance with the different methods. The incidence of uterine subseptations according to each method's specifications was compared among the groups and the association with pregnancy loss was evaluated.The database comprised 125 women with uterine subseptations and all four diagnostic systems identified septate uteri within it. The 5.9-mm cut-off diagnosed 89 septate, and 36 normal uteri and was the most inclusive while the ASRM cut-off was the most restrictive one, diagnosing 92/125 as arcuate uteri, only 8/125 as septate, and 25 in the gray zone. The AFS-10 mm criteria diagnosed 92/125 as arcuate, and 33 (26.4%) as septate uteri. Subseptations were inconsistently diagnosed by the ESHRE-ESGE classification, as some subseptations longer than 10 mm would be classified as normal uteri. Five/24 women had had one previous early loss and 19/24 had recurrent pregnancy loss. The 5.9-mm system was the most sensitive, while the ASRM was the least sensitive in predicting pregnancy loss (71.2% vs. 9.5% of septate uteri).The proposed 5.9-mm cut-off was the most sensitive in diagnosing a septate uterus and in predicting an associated early pregnancy loss. Conversely, the AFS-10 mm and the ASRM were the most restrictive, potentially missing treatment for hazardous subseptations. This update highlights the major weaknesses in the current diagnosis of uterine subseptations and indication for surgical treatment. Standardization of clinical practice is essential for reproductive clinicians and efforts should be made to prevent even one further early pregnancy loss to uterine subseptations." @default.
• W3161690147 created "2021-05-24" @default.
• W3161690147 creator A5009800311 @default.
• W3161690147 creator A5050877828 @default.
• W3161690147 creator A5063797337 @default.
• W3161690147 creator A5063877510 @default.
• W3161690147 creator A5071461337 @default.
• W3161690147 creator A5008802893 @default.
• W3161690147 date "2021-05-01" @default.
• W3161690147 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3161690147 title "A comparison of four systems for uterine septum diagnosis and indication for surgical correction" @default.
• W3161690147 cites W1991977334 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2060123201 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2075811345 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2093472199 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2109851011 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2119883232 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2141418885 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2207078070 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2404237870 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2507186821 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2570646242 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2576081979 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2579064392 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2624778036 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2764019157 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2769524784 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2795179512 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2889318360 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2894819693 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W2896098116 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W3022836576 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W3093638731 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W3104265978 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W3147763767 @default.
• W3161690147 cites W4253353642 @default.
• W3161690147 doi "https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04789-4" @default.
• W3161690147 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34008393" @default.
• W3161690147 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3161690147 type Work @default.
• W3161690147 sameAs 3161690147 @default.
• W3161690147 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3161690147 countsByYear W31616901472022 @default.
• W3161690147 countsByYear W31616901472023 @default.
• W3161690147 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3161690147 hasAuthorship W3161690147A5008802893 @default.
• W3161690147 hasAuthorship W3161690147A5009800311 @default.
• W3161690147 hasAuthorship W3161690147A5050877828 @default.
• W3161690147 hasAuthorship W3161690147A5063797337 @default.
• W3161690147 hasAuthorship W3161690147A5063877510 @default.
• W3161690147 hasAuthorship W3161690147A5071461337 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C2777818092 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C2779066055 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C126322002 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C131872663 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C141071460 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C142724271 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C151730666 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C2524010 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C2776478404 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C2777818092 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C2779066055 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C29456083 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C33923547 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C61511704 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C71924100 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C86803240 @default.
• W3161690147 hasConceptScore W3161690147C95190672 @default.
• W3161690147 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3161690147 hasLocation W31616901471 @default.
• W3161690147 hasLocation W31616901472 @default.
• W3161690147 hasOpenAccess W3161690147 @default.
• W3161690147 hasPrimaryLocation W31616901471 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W2275480158 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W3161690147 hasRelatedWork W2903040050 @default.
• W3161690147 hasVolume "73" @default.
• W3161690147 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3161690147 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3161690147 magId "3161690147" @default.

• next