FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3161748192> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3161748192 abstract "Amidst the U.S.-China trade war, China’s banking sector, the backbone of China’s economy, plays a key role in this battle. China’s banking sector, however, poses a puzzle to contemporary studies of state-owned banks (“SBs”). According to the property right theory, the mainstream SB theory, SBs are negative for the financial and economic development of an economy because it is susceptible to more serious agency problems, excessive political intervention, and conflict of interest between state regulators and state owners. That said, the economic success of China, whose banks are mostly owned and controlled by the Chinese party-state supports the development theory, a minority theory that highlights the development function of SBs in mobilizing domestic investible funds to support strategic industries.To have a clearer understanding of China’s banking sector, I engage in the debate between the property right theory and the development theory by comparing the experience of four East Asian developmental states, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. After comprehensively reviewing the banking evolution in these economies, I put forward a “relative theory” to account for SBs. I argue that the relative success and failure depends on the relative efficiency of the state sector vis-a-vis the private sector in promoting development. In the early stage of an economy’s development, the private sector might have collective action problems to come up with a coherent development policy for the economy; hence, the state sector is relatively better positioned in allocating the investible fund, and its ownership of banks thus promotes development. Nevertheless, as an economy develops and the corresponding institutions mature, the private sector might become relatively more efficient in allocating the investible fund, which demands the state to reduce its intervention in the banking sector. According to this relative theory, the success of China’s SBs in promoting economic development might not be sustainable. At some point, the Chinese party-state would need to readjust its role. That said, this does not necessarily lead to the privatization of SBs in China. As East Asia’s experience suggests, there may be a variety of ways for China to transition to a banking system that is less dominated by the party-state. The current trade war might offer this turning point as it evolves into a finance war." @default.
• W3161748192 created "2021-05-24" @default.
• W3161748192 creator A5024389886 @default.
• W3161748192 date "2020-05-08" @default.
• W3161748192 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3161748192 title "Should The Proud Dragon Repent? A Relative Theory for China’s State Capitalist Banking Sector Based On East Asia’s Experience" @default.
• W3161748192 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3161748192 type Work @default.
• W3161748192 sameAs 3161748192 @default.
• W3161748192 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3161748192 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3161748192 hasAuthorship W3161748192A5024389886 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C121426985 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C136264566 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConcept C74363100 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C11413529 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C121426985 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C136264566 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C144133560 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C162324750 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C17744445 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C191935318 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C199539241 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C2777617010 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C34447519 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C41008148 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C48103436 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C50522688 @default.
• W3161748192 hasConceptScore W3161748192C74363100 @default.
• W3161748192 hasLocation W31617481921 @default.
• W3161748192 hasOpenAccess W3161748192 @default.
• W3161748192 hasPrimaryLocation W31617481921 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W1481602480 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W1512376232 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W1528855509 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W172603399 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W1989347867 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2039131225 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2066164893 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2153080859 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2183507186 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2296894933 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2503598929 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2751475039 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2911383292 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2913378694 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W3032104456 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W3121947630 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W3123822490 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W3147070604 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W560118674 @default.
• W3161748192 hasRelatedWork W2515504976 @default.
• W3161748192 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3161748192 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3161748192 magId "3161748192" @default.
• W3161748192 workType "article" @default.