FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3162209615> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3162209615 endingPage "432" @default.
• W3162209615 startingPage "226" @default.
• W3162209615 abstract "Intraarticular distal radius fractures are a therapeutic challenge for the orthopedist surgeon there are studies that support the use of fluoroscopy, and others promote arthroscopy, with this work we try to summarize the evidence, to determine whether arthroscopic assistance provides additional benefits to avoid joint incongruities compared to results obtained under fluoroscopic assistance.Systematic search for prospective, retrospective, cohort, follow-up, clinical trials on PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Scielo, Embase, Google Scholar and other national sources, including as keywords the terms: intra-articular distal radius fracture, wrist arthroscopy, arthroscopy, fluoroscopy. The average values and standard offsets for each characteristic, obtained from the selected works, were analyzed using descriptive statistics and illustrative graphs.463 patients (256 women and 207 men) were evaluated, with an average age of 48.29 years and range from 39 to 64 years. The two treatments (A and F) were homogeneous in terms of the age of the patients reporting (p = 0.5820) and the average follow-up time (p = 0.9597). Only the ulnar deviation and DASH score, for which the arthroscopy group performed best, in the remaining variables the differences were not significant.The evidence available to date is conflicting, and does not allow recommendations to be made for or against these interventions, finding other factors that could influence decision-making.Las fracturas intraarticulares de radio distal son un desafío terapéutico para el cirujano ortopedista. Hay estudios que avalan el uso de la fluoroscopía y otros promueven la artroscopia. Con este trabajo intentamos resumir la evidencia, para determinar si la asistencia artroscópica aporta beneficios adicionales para evitar incongruencias articulares en comparación con los resultados obtenidos bajo asistencia fluoroscópica.Búsqueda sistemática de estudios prospectivos, retrospectivos, de cohortes, seguimiento, ensayos clínicos en PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Scielo, Embase, Google Scholar y otras fuentes nacionales, incluyendo como palabras clave los términos.<em>intraarticular distal radius fracture</em>, <em>wrist arthroscopy</em>, <em>arthroscopy</em>, <em>fluoroscopy</em>. Los valores medios y desvíos estándar para cada característica, obtenidos de los trabajos seleccionados fueron analizados usando estadística descriptiva y gráficos ilustrativos. Fueron evaluados 463 pacientes (256 mujeres y 207 hombres), con una edad promedio de 48.29 años y rango de 39 a 64 años. Los dos tratamientos (A y F) fueron homogéneos en cuanto a la edad de los pacientes que reportan (p = 0.5820) y el tiempo de seguimiento promedio (p = 0.9597). Sólo la desviación cubital y el DASH, para las cuales el grupo de artroscopía tuvo mejor desempeño, en las variables restantes las diferencias no fueron significativas.La evidencia disponible hasta la fecha es controvertida y no permite hacer recomendaciones a favor o en contra de estas intervenciones, encontrando otros factores que podrían influir en la toma de decisiones." @default.
• W3162209615 created "2021-05-24" @default.
• W3162209615 creator A5024182594 @default.
• W3162209615 creator A5054993549 @default.
• W3162209615 creator A5064887286 @default.
• W3162209615 creator A5068471332 @default.
• W3162209615 creator A5076509321 @default.
• W3162209615 creator A5086910528 @default.
• W3162209615 date "2021-05-22" @default.
• W3162209615 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3162209615 title "[Distal radius intraarticular fractures: fluoroscopy reduction versus arthroscopic assistance. Systematic review]." @default.
• W3162209615 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34020525" @default.
• W3162209615 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3162209615 type Work @default.
• W3162209615 sameAs 3162209615 @default.
• W3162209615 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3162209615 countsByYear W31622096152021 @default.
• W3162209615 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3162209615 hasAuthorship W3162209615A5024182594 @default.
• W3162209615 hasAuthorship W3162209615A5054993549 @default.
• W3162209615 hasAuthorship W3162209615A5064887286 @default.
• W3162209615 hasAuthorship W3162209615A5068471332 @default.
• W3162209615 hasAuthorship W3162209615A5076509321 @default.
• W3162209615 hasAuthorship W3162209615A5086910528 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C2778216619 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C2780702433 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C111335779 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C141071460 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C142724271 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C17744445 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C19648533 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C199539241 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C204787440 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C2524010 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C2776805002 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C2778216619 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C2779162959 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C2779473830 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C2780702433 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C2781184374 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C2989005 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C33923547 @default.
• W3162209615 hasConceptScore W3162209615C71924100 @default.
• W3162209615 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3162209615 hasLocation W31622096151 @default.
• W3162209615 hasOpenAccess W3162209615 @default.
• W3162209615 hasPrimaryLocation W31622096151 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W10852199 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W11492209 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W18111600 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W19215909 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W2507423 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W3345564 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W4375193 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W5046735 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W8659003 @default.
• W3162209615 hasRelatedWork W868667 @default.
• W3162209615 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W3162209615 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3162209615 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3162209615 magId "3162209615" @default.
• W3162209615 workType "article" @default.