FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3162548633> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3162548633 endingPage "689" @default.
• W3162548633 startingPage "681" @default.
• W3162548633 abstract "Despite many technical advances the debate continues on single versus staged procedures for proximal hypospadias. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we have compared the contemporary outcomes of proximal hypospadias repair: single stage foreskin pedicle tube (FPT) versus two stage foreskin free graft (FFG) and two-stage foreskin pedicled flap (FPF) over the last decade.A systematic literature review of publications in English of the following electronic databases was conducted: Cochrane Database, PUBMED, MEDLINE and EMBASE. The following keywords were used: (proximal) AND (hypospadias) AND (repair OR urethroplasty) AND (outcomes OR complications). The publication date range for studies was from January 2010 to December 2020. Outcomes analyzed were complications like urethro-cutaneous fistula (UCF), glans dehiscence (GD), meatal stenosis (MS), urethral stricture (US), urethral diverticulum (UD), recurrent curvature or residual chordee (RC), buried penis (BP) and poor cosmesis (PC) as per objective assessment scores, or poor graft uptake (PGF) during first stage. We also divided the papers based on case load into two groups: < 5 cases or >5 cases operated per year and compared the post-operative outcomes.The I 2 statistics for prevalence of total complications showed high heterogeneity with I 2 of 88% for one stage repair and 92% & 98% for two stage repairs. The pooled data from 26 articles covered a total of 2664 patients; mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1.8-14 years). One stage repair (FPT) was used in 680 (25%) patients while two stage repair was used in 1984 (75%) patients. Complications were encountered in 285/680 (42%) of those who underwent single stage repair (FPT) and this was significantly higher (Fishers; p = 0.001) than 414/1984 (21%) complication rate seen in two stage repair. Among the two different techniques of two stage operations over-all complication rate was not significantly different (Fisher's; p = 0.1) between FFG (155/674; 23%) and FPF (259/1310; 20%). FFG was superior to FPF in terms of individual complications UCF, MS, GD and UD. For two-stage FPT and FPF repairs the complication rate significantly reduced (p = 0.01) with increasing case load. For single stage repairs the complication rate remained high despite the increasing case load.Two-stage repair of proximal hypospadias had significantly less complications compared to single stage repair. Among two-stage repairs specific complications were significantly less for FFG, although total complications were not significantly different from that seen with FPF. The results of two-stage repairs improved with higher case load supporting the concept of dedicated hypospadias centres." @default.
• W3162548633 created "2021-05-24" @default.
• W3162548633 creator A5051528118 @default.
• W3162548633 creator A5077175136 @default.
• W3162548633 date "2021-10-01" @default.
• W3162548633 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3162548633 title "Meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of single stage (foreskin pedicled tube) versus two stage (foreskin free graft & foreskin pedicled flap) repair for proximal hypospadias in the last decade" @default.
• W3162548633 cites W1104940987 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W1208509788 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W1722489981 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W1808389387 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W1992819327 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2008760089 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2010341548 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2041667019 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2042656243 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2058712206 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2080159359 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2081316569 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2082895675 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2084614144 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2092590848 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2100633066 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2112034306 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2131593671 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2134833483 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2157450562 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2220548475 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2297640592 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2398608180 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2466199945 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2517640127 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2526184832 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2551162404 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2559444979 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2604837152 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2607171778 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2622674814 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2742859121 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2795454323 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2806406717 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W2922406583 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W3000521459 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W3034756874 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W3042545823 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W3045613313 @default.
• W3162548633 cites W3047407443 @default.
• W3162548633 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.05.014" @default.
• W3162548633 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34099397" @default.
• W3162548633 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3162548633 type Work @default.
• W3162548633 sameAs 3162548633 @default.
• W3162548633 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W3162548633 countsByYear W31625486332021 @default.
• W3162548633 countsByYear W31625486332022 @default.
• W3162548633 countsByYear W31625486332023 @default.
• W3162548633 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3162548633 hasAuthorship W3162548633A5051528118 @default.
• W3162548633 hasAuthorship W3162548633A5077175136 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C139812875 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2776603339 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2777050469 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2777085111 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2777560510 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2777786686 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2777990738 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2778655861 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2778841284 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2780943399 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C2781140480 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C81885089 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C139812875 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C141071460 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C146357865 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C151730666 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2776603339 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2777050469 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2777085111 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2777560510 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2777786686 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2777990738 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2778655861 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2778841284 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2780943399 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C2781140480 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C54355233 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C71924100 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C81885089 @default.
• W3162548633 hasConceptScore W3162548633C86803240 @default.
• W3162548633 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3162548633 hasLocation W31625486331 @default.
• W3162548633 hasLocation W31625486332 @default.

• next