FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3162744572> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3162744572 endingPage "e24190" @default.
• W3162744572 startingPage "e24190" @default.
• W3162744572 abstract "Background Adherence rates of preventative medication for cardiovascular disease (CVD) have been reported as 57%, and approximately 9% of all CVD events in Europe are attributable to poor medication adherence. Mobile health technologies, particularly mobile apps, have the potential to improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes. Objective The objective of this study is to assess the effects of mobile health care apps on medication adherence and health-related outcomes in patients with CVD. This study also evaluates apps’ functionality and usability and the involvement of health care professionals in their use. Methods Electronic databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], and Google Scholar) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate app-based interventions aimed at improving medication adherence in patients with CVD. RCTs published in English from inception to January 2020 were reviewed. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed for clinical outcomes and medication adherence, with meta-regression analysis used to evaluate the impact of app intervention duration on medication adherence. Results This study included 16 RCTs published within the last 6 years. In total, 12 RCTs reported medication adherence as the primary outcome, which is the most commonly self-reported adherence. The duration of the interventions ranged from 1 to 12 months, and sample sizes ranged from 24 to 412. Medication adherence rates showed statistically significant improvements in 9 RCTs when compared with the control, and meta-analysis of the 6 RCTs reporting continuous data showed a significant overall effect in favor of the app intervention (mean difference 0.90, 95% CI 0.03-1.78) with a high statistical heterogeneity (I2=93.32%). Moreover, 9 RCTs assessed clinical outcomes and reported an improvement in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the intervention arm. Meta-analysis of these clinical outcomes from 6 RCTs favored app interventions, but none were significant. In the 7 trials evaluating app usability, all were found to be acceptable. There was a great variation in the app characteristics. A total of 10 RCTs involved health care professionals, mainly physicians and nurses, in the app-based interventions. The apps had mixed functionality: 2 used education, 7 delivered reminders, and 7 provided reminders in combination with educational support. Conclusions Apps tended to increase medication adherence, but interventions varied widely in design, content, and delivery. Apps have an acceptable degree of usability; yet the app characteristics conferring usability and effectiveness are ill-defined. Future large-scale studies should focus on identifying the essential active components of successful apps. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42019121385; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=121385" @default.
• W3162744572 created "2021-05-24" @default.
• W3162744572 creator A5023331080 @default.
• W3162744572 creator A5042407608 @default.
• W3162744572 creator A5051429815 @default.
• W3162744572 creator A5053843507 @default.
• W3162744572 creator A5063772049 @default.
• W3162744572 creator A5068556161 @default.
• W3162744572 creator A5085656559 @default.
• W3162744572 date "2021-05-25" @default.
• W3162744572 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3162744572 title "Mobile Apps to Improve Medication Adherence in Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" @default.
• W3162744572 cites W1480140759 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W1480792331 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W1778060856 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W1887067478 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W1969234757 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W1969321932 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W1972110417 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W1980081426 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W1986859801 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2020176599 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2033250946 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2035974063 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2042396675 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2067694868 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2089502871 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2098999730 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2113320440 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2120335639 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2122295735 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2134833483 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2157318918 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2166259143 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2168217134 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2173071518 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2290318277 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2395936517 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2461380379 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2462239282 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2513347091 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2520116453 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2528096925 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2604186734 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2615354466 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2735136142 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2738260258 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2745811192 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2783452961 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2794884228 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2799837895 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2889343999 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2892132144 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2901488466 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2901521992 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2905924976 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2921747913 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2928493557 @default.
• W3162744572 cites W2990409785 @default.
• W3162744572 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/24190" @default.
• W3162744572 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8188316" @default.
• W3162744572 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34032583" @default.
• W3162744572 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3162744572 type Work @default.
• W3162744572 sameAs 3162744572 @default.
• W3162744572 citedByCount "45" @default.
• W3162744572 countsByYear W31627445722021 @default.
• W3162744572 countsByYear W31627445722022 @default.
• W3162744572 countsByYear W31627445722023 @default.
• W3162744572 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3162744572 hasAuthorship W3162744572A5023331080 @default.
• W3162744572 hasAuthorship W3162744572A5042407608 @default.
• W3162744572 hasAuthorship W3162744572A5051429815 @default.
• W3162744572 hasAuthorship W3162744572A5053843507 @default.
• W3162744572 hasAuthorship W3162744572A5063772049 @default.
• W3162744572 hasAuthorship W3162744572A5068556161 @default.
• W3162744572 hasAuthorship W3162744572A5085656559 @default.
• W3162744572 hasBestOaLocation W31627445721 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C3018553135 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConceptScore W3162744572C118552586 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConceptScore W3162744572C126322002 @default.
• W3162744572 hasConceptScore W3162744572C168563851 @default.

• next