Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W316427336> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W316427336 startingPage "947" @default.
- W316427336 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION Mexico's branch is the weakest of its federal government's three branches for a variety of historical, structural, political, and socio-cultural reasons.1 On January 1, 1995, several significant amendments to the Constitution of Mexico became effective.2 The amendments, submitted by President Ernesto Zedillo one month after taking office, revised twenty-seven articles of the Mexican Constitution3 in order to reform the structure and powers of the Mexican federal system.4 The amendments to the Constitution reduced the number of Court Ministers (Justices), changed the manner in which Ministers are appointed to the Court, reduced the Ministers' tenure, expanded the jurisdiction of the Court, and created the Council of the Federal Judiciary (Consejo de la Judicatura Federal).5 Commentators on the Mexican legal system have criticized the 1995 amendments for not going far enough to reform the federal judiciary and strengthen the rule of law in Mexico.6 Although these commentators have identified important shortcomings of the 1995 amendments, this Note makes two contentions that differ from the previous literature. First, this Note contends that some of the constitutional amendments may be more effective than previously argued or, at least, that they contain fewer and less damning flaws than previously argued. Second, this Note agrees that some of the reforms will likely fail to markedly strengthen the system, but it attributes that failure to reasons different from those cited by other commentators and identifies other potential defects. In the end, however, this Note takes a more hopeful or, at least, less doubtful, view of the 1995 amendments and the potential for reform in Mexico. The bases for this view are: (1) the amendments may not be as flawed as previously contended; (2) the new amendments sought to strength the judiciary, a departure from previous judicial reform; and (3) a significant change in Mexican politics has occurred which, when combined with other changes taking place in the legal culture in Mexico, may affect the effectiveness of the reforms. Although Mexico has a long tradition of amending its Constitution,7 the 1995 reforms were significant because they departed from previous reforms that strengthened the executive branch and weakened the judiciary.8 The 1995 reforms are intended to strengthen the federal judiciary's independence and power.9 These reforms are a first step to strengthening the rule of law and the system in Mexico. The reforms should be reevaluated, however, in light of Vincente Fox's election as President in July 2000.10 Fox's victory changes the political calculus of how and whether the legal reforms will be respected, enforced, and potentially strengthened. Part II of this Note provides an overview of the Mexican Constitution and system of government, followed by background on the legal and system in Mexico. This section looks back at Mexico's civil law tradition, surveys pre-1995 reform in Mexico, and describes Mexican courts' organization and powers prior to the 1995 amendments. Part II of this Note then examines key provisions of the 1995 amendments and their underlying motivations. Finally, Part III of the Note analyzes the 1995 reforms and discusses prospects for further reform. Specifically, this section will re-examine the strengths and weakness of the 1995 reforms, and consider prospects for greater independence and reforms in light of the 2000 election. II. DISCUSSION A. Overview of the Mexican Constitution and System of Government In Mexico, the Supreme Power of the Federation is divided into the executive, legislative, and branches, as in the United States.11 The Mexican Constitution (Constitution), modeled after the U.S. Constitution, established the Mexican government as a federal republic, comprised of thirty-one states and divided into three branches. …" @default.
- W316427336 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W316427336 creator A5018588236 @default.
- W316427336 date "2003-01-01" @default.
- W316427336 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W316427336 title "Making Amends with the Mexican Constitution: Reassessing the 1995 Judicial Reforms and Considering Prospects for Further Reform" @default.
- W316427336 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W316427336 type Work @default.
- W316427336 sameAs 316427336 @default.
- W316427336 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W316427336 countsByYear W3164273362012 @default.
- W316427336 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W316427336 hasAuthorship W316427336A5018588236 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C2776449231 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C533735693 @default.
- W316427336 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C138885662 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C144024400 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C17744445 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C199539241 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C2776154427 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C2776449231 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C2776949292 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C2778137410 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C41895202 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C533735693 @default.
- W316427336 hasConceptScore W316427336C94625758 @default.
- W316427336 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W316427336 hasLocation W3164273361 @default.
- W316427336 hasOpenAccess W316427336 @default.
- W316427336 hasPrimaryLocation W3164273361 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W1490672586 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W1495961293 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W1539661489 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W1554818968 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W1563659601 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W1565544119 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W1973157631 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W2047589593 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W2143495115 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W2256140889 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W2346315552 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W2737234768 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W2750715322 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W2755697829 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W291686183 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W2973125538 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W3091893543 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W3123509219 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W3123651135 @default.
- W316427336 hasRelatedWork W3204306176 @default.
- W316427336 hasVolume "35" @default.
- W316427336 isParatext "false" @default.
- W316427336 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W316427336 magId "316427336" @default.
- W316427336 workType "article" @default.