FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3164431617> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3164431617 endingPage "14" @default.
• W3164431617 startingPage "4" @default.
• W3164431617 abstract "&#x0D; Objectives: The demand for cardiopulmonary assessment via real-time live streaming is prevalent in remote communities of British Columbia, Canada. Digital stethoscopes enable remote assessments, but the difference in quality compared to conventional assessments is unknown. Objectives were to explore published literature for real-time remote audio and video streaming of cardiopulmonary assessments via digital stethoscopes, and evaluate the quality of digital stethoscopes for remote cardiopulmonary assessments as compared to conventional stethoscopes in a Cardiac Virtual health Assessments (CaViAs) project.&#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; Materials and Methods: CaViAs included evaluation of quality and utility of three digital stethoscope devices, three digital platforms/applications, three noise-cancelling headsets, and two Internet-enabled devices with one technical operator and one evaluator. A comprehensive search for “digital stethoscope*” was conducted in PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, TRIP, Open Grey and ClinicalTrials.gov in February 2021 for relevant peer reviewed studies. Studies were screened for eligibility and inclusion based on population, intervention, comparator, outcome and study design criteria and utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis, and assessed for methodological quality using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for Randomized Controlled Trials. Studies were eligible if they included adult humans undergoing cardiopulmonary assessment with digital stethoscopes compared to conventional stethoscopes to test the audio quality and ease of use of digital stethoscopes via real-time remote audio and video streaming across a distance.&#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; Results: Of 238 articles identified, only one study of poor methodological quality was found that fulfilled all inclusion criteria. This study rated the quality of digital stethoscopes as good or very good. In the CaViAs project, the Eko Duo digital stethoscope in combination with the Eko ECG application, streamed between two Cisco DX 80 devices, and using the Plantronics Voyager 8200 performed the best. Limitations included having only one reviewer for title and abstract screening and data extraction; hearing is subjective; a validated tool for quality testing was not used; and auscultation in general has several limitations.&#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; Conclusion: There is a gap in literature to help inform decision-making in choosing digital stethoscopes that are best for real-time virtual remote outreach for cardiopulmonary assessments. For best results, digital stethoscopes should be used in conjunction with equipment that optimize audio and ease of use.&#x0D; &#x0D; This article was published by Scientific Scholar and has been archived here. DOI of the article is 10.25259/JMRI_2_2021." @default.
• W3164431617 created "2021-06-07" @default.
• W3164431617 creator A5028660476 @default.
• W3164431617 creator A5072830263 @default.
• W3164431617 date "2022-02-07" @default.
• W3164431617 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W3164431617 title "A systematic review and utilization study of digital stethoscopes for cardiopulmonary assessments" @default.
• W3164431617 cites W1530249494 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W1972438460 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W1990895889 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2025460051 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2049734941 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2074454475 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2077460349 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2085116996 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2089820028 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2096961481 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2098720636 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2100311252 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2116837617 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2156242782 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2232610944 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2507377957 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2514497368 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2755621099 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2777815950 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2782469814 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2786275523 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2902376860 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2908035970 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2919604334 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2925616177 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2949308781 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2953066682 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2996291505 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W3011682783 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W3025554805 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W3119196740 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W3125941353 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W4237805639 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W4238034444 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W3164431617 cites W2976935696 @default.
• W3164431617 doi "https://doi.org/10.25259/jmri_2_2021" @default.
• W3164431617 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W3164431617 type Work @default.
• W3164431617 sameAs 3164431617 @default.
• W3164431617 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3164431617 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3164431617 hasAuthorship W3164431617A5028660476 @default.
• W3164431617 hasAuthorship W3164431617A5072830263 @default.
• W3164431617 hasBestOaLocation W31644316171 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C167310288 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C2779055095 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C111472728 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C126838900 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C138885662 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C159110408 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C160735492 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C162324750 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C167310288 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C19527891 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C27415008 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C2779055095 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C2779530757 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C2779891985 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C2781145037 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C28490314 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C41008148 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C50522688 @default.
• W3164431617 hasConceptScore W3164431617C71924100 @default.
• W3164431617 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3164431617 hasLocation W31644316171 @default.
• W3164431617 hasOpenAccess W3164431617 @default.
• W3164431617 hasPrimaryLocation W31644316171 @default.
• W3164431617 hasRelatedWork W116786007 @default.
• W3164431617 hasRelatedWork W1488283763 @default.
• W3164431617 hasRelatedWork W1542135214 @default.
• W3164431617 hasRelatedWork W2094815827 @default.
• W3164431617 hasRelatedWork W2145044391 @default.
• W3164431617 hasRelatedWork W2408619640 @default.
• W3164431617 hasRelatedWork W2619360019 @default.
• W3164431617 hasRelatedWork W2805238866 @default.

• next