FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3164503271> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3164503271 endingPage "e27102" @default.
• W3164503271 startingPage "e27102" @default.
• W3164503271 abstract "Background Given the magnitude and speed of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, achieving timely and effective manual contact tracing has been a challenging task. Early in the pandemic, contact tracing apps generated substantial enthusiasm due to their potential for automating tracing and reducing transmission rates while enabling targeted confinement strategies. However, although surveys demonstrate public interest in using such apps, their actual uptake remains limited. Their social acceptability is challenged by issues around privacy, fairness, and effectiveness, among other concerns. Objective This study aims to examine the extent to which design and implementation considerations for contact tracing apps are detailed in the available literature, focusing on aspects related to participatory and responsible eHealth innovation, and synthesize recommendations that support the development of successful COVID-19 contact tracing apps and related eHealth technologies. Methods Searches were performed on five databases, and articles were selected based on eligibility criteria. Papers pertaining to the design, implementation, or acceptability of contact tracing apps were included. Articles published since 2019, written in English or French, and for which the full articles were available were considered eligible for analysis. To assess the scope of the knowledge found in the current literature, we used three complementary frameworks: (1) the Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies, (2) the Montreal model, and (3) the Responsible Innovation in Health Assessment Tool. Results A total of 63 articles qualified for the final analysis. Less than half of the selected articles cited the need for a participatory process (n=25, 40%), which nonetheless was the most frequently referenced item of the Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies. Regarding the Montreal model, stakeholder consultation was the most frequently described level of engagement in the development of contact tracing apps (n=24, 38%), while collaboration and partnership were cited the least (n=2, 3%). As for the Responsible Innovation in Health framework, all the articles (n=63, 100%) addressed population health, whereas only 2% (n=1) covered environmental considerations. Conclusions Most studies lacked fundamental aspects of eHealth development and implementation. Our results demonstrate that stakeholders of COVID-19 contact tracing apps lack important information to be able to critically appraise this eHealth innovation. This may have contributed to the modest uptake of contact tracing apps worldwide. We make evidence-informed recommendations regarding data management, communication, stakeholder engagement, user experience, and implementation strategies for the successful and responsible development of contact tracing apps." @default.
• W3164503271 created "2021-06-07" @default.
• W3164503271 creator A5018538027 @default.
• W3164503271 creator A5021998813 @default.
• W3164503271 creator A5035943593 @default.
• W3164503271 creator A5056811223 @default.
• W3164503271 creator A5057212064 @default.
• W3164503271 creator A5078384968 @default.
• W3164503271 date "2021-06-09" @default.
• W3164503271 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3164503271 title "Considerations for the Design and Implementation of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Scoping Review" @default.
• W3164503271 cites W1567587037 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W1899674720 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2072181779 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2075950485 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2091865253 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2094989614 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2107459555 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2142685440 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2464457728 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2481662183 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2803820580 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2889884276 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W2891378911 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3008443627 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3012875567 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3013215798 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3014146874 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3019171825 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3021966615 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3021970994 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3024037399 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3031033363 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3031053929 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3032586199 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3034002631 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3034141099 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3036079395 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3036422000 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3038855713 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3041710706 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3043265868 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3045167049 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3047474781 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3047822180 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3047864354 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3048399669 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3048434109 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3048458052 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3080395642 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3080982019 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3082543997 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3082861997 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3088123725 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3089950937 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3091894564 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3092364793 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3093148635 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3093517140 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3094807411 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3097589046 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3124823054 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3125958030 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3130081683 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3132861199 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W3211102475 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W4205924949 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W4206413660 @default.
• W3164503271 cites W4252441394 @default.
• W3164503271 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/27102" @default.
• W3164503271 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8191727" @default.
• W3164503271 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34038376" @default.
• W3164503271 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3164503271 type Work @default.
• W3164503271 sameAs 3164503271 @default.
• W3164503271 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W3164503271 countsByYear W31645032712021 @default.
• W3164503271 countsByYear W31645032712022 @default.
• W3164503271 countsByYear W31645032712023 @default.
• W3164503271 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3164503271 hasAuthorship W3164503271A5018538027 @default.
• W3164503271 hasAuthorship W3164503271A5021998813 @default.
• W3164503271 hasAuthorship W3164503271A5035943593 @default.
• W3164503271 hasAuthorship W3164503271A5056811223 @default.
• W3164503271 hasAuthorship W3164503271A5057212064 @default.
• W3164503271 hasAuthorship W3164503271A5078384968 @default.
• W3164503271 hasBestOaLocation W31645032711 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C113162765 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C202645933 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C203663800 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W3164503271 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.

• next